The role of preoperative mammography in women considering reduction mammoplasty: a single institution review of 207 patients

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 199, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 636-640

  Campbell, Michael J ^a   Clark, Clancy J ^a   Paige, Keith T ^a  

^a VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast reduction; Preoperative mammography; Reduction mammoplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER SCREENING; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAMMAPLASTY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SELECTION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77951927787     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ries LA, Harkins D, Krapcho M, et al. Breast. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003. Section 4:142006.
2. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Reconstructive surgery trends 1992, 2006, 2007. http://www.plasticsurgery.org
3. Clark C.C., Wang S.W., and Paige K.P. Incidence of precancerous lesions in breast reduction tissue: a pathologic review of 562 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 124 (2009) 1033-1039
4. Fletcher S.F., and Elmore J.E. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 348 (2003) 1672-1680
5. Iwuagwu O.C., Platt A.J., and Drew P.J. Breast reduction surgery in the UK and Ireland-current trends. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88 (2006) 585-588
6. Hage J.J., and Karim R.B. Risk of breast cancer among reduction mammoplasty patients and the strategies used by plastic surgeons to detect such cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 117 (2006) 727
7. Smith R.A., Saslow D., Sawyer K.A., et al., American Cancer Society High-Risk Work Group, American Cancer Society Screening Older Women Work Group, American Cancer Society Mammography Work Group, American Cancer Society Physical Examination Work Group, American Cancer Society New Technologies Work Group, American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory Group. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 53 (2003) 141-169
8. Berg W.A., D'Orsi C.J., Jackson V.P., et al. Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography?. Radiology 224 (2002) 871-880
9. Perras C. Fifteen years of mammography in cosmetic surgery of the breast. Aesthetic Plast Surg 14 (1990) 81-84
10. Brown M.L., Houn F., Sickles E.A., et al. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165 (1995) 1373-1377
11. Elmore J.E., Carney P.C., Abraham L.A., et al. The association between obesity and screening mammography. Arch Intern Med 164 (2004) 1140-1147
12. Guest A.R., Helvie M.A., Chan H.P., et al. Adverse effects of increased body weight on quantitative measures of mammographic image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175 (2000) 805-810
13. Kerlikowske K., Grady D., Barclay J., et al. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. JAMA 270 (1993) 2444-2450
14. Lidbrink E., Elfving J., Frisell J., et al. Neglected aspects of false positive findings of mammography in breast cancer screening: analysis of false positive cases from the Stockholm trial. BMJ 312 (1996) 273-276
15. Ciatto S., Cecchini S., del Turco M.R., et al. Referral policy and positive predictive value of call for surgical biopsy in the Florence Breast Cancer Screening Program. J Clin Epidemiol 43 (1990) 419-423
16. Christiansen C.L., Wang F., Barton M.B., et al. Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms. J Natl Cancer Inst 92 (2000) 1657-1666
17. Brewer N.T., Salz T., and Lillie S.E. Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med 146 (2007) 502-510
18. Tyndel S., Austoker J., Henderson B.J., et al. What is the psychological impact of mammographic screening on younger women with a family history of breast cancer?. Findings from a prospective cohort study by the PIMMS Management Group. J Clin Oncol 25 (2007) 3823-3830
19. Barton M.B., Morley D.S., Moore S., et al. Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 96 (2004) 529-538
20. Bassett L.B., Hendrick R.H., and Bassford T.B. Quality determinants of mammography, clinical practice guideline no. 13 (1994), Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD
21. Smith-Bindman R., Chu P.W., Miglioretti D.L., et al. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. JAMA 290 (2003) 2129-2137