What's the Control in Studies Measuring the Effect of Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) on Observer Performance?

Academic Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 761-767

  Obuchowski, Nancy A ^a   Meziane, Moulay ^a   Dachman, Abraham H ^b   Lieber, Michael L ^a   Mazzone, Peter J ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

CADe; diagnostic accuracy; MRMC study; ROC analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUNG NODULE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVER BIAS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77951826596     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.01.018     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Dodd L.E., Wagner R.F., Armato S.G., et al. Lung Image Database Consortium Research Group. Assessment methodologies and statistical issues for computer-aided diagnosis of lung nodules in computed tomography: contemporary research topics relevant to the lung image database consortium. Acad Radiol 11 (2004) 462-475
2. Wagner R.F., Metz C.E., and Campbell G. Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review. Acad Radiol 14 (2007) 723-748
3. Das M., Muhlenbruch G., Mahnken A.H., et al. Small pulmonary nodules: effect of two computer-aided detection systems on radiologists performance. Radiology 241 (2006) 564-571
4. Halligan S., Altman D.G., Mallett S., et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologists performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 131 (2006) 1690-1699
5. Fenton J.J., Taplin S.H., Carney P.A., et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 356 (2007) 1399-1409
6. Birdwell R.L., Bandodkar P., and Ikeda D.M. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology 236 (2005) 451-457
7. Gur D., Sumkin J.H., Rockette H.E., et al. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 96 (2004) 185-190
8. Cupples T.E., Cunningham J.E., and Reynolds J.C. Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. AJR Am J Radiol 185 (2005) 944-950
9. Rutter C.M., and Taplin S. Assessing mammographers' accuracy: a comparison of clinical and test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 53 (2000) 443-450
10. Gur D. ROC-type assessment of medical imaging and CAD technologies. Acad Radiol 10 (2003) 402-403
11. Gur D. Objectively measuring and comparing performance levels of diagnostic imaging systems and practices. Acad Radiol 14 (2007) 641-642
12. Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, page 12. Available at www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm187277.htm. Accessed February 16, 2010.
13. Zhou X.H., Obuchowski N.A., and McClish D.L. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine (2002), Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York
14. Zalis M.E., Barish M.A., Choi J.R., et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236 (2005) 3-9
15. Obuchowski N.A., Mazzone P.J., and Dachman A.H. Bias, underestimation of risk and loss of statistical power in patient-level analyses of lesion detection. Eur Radiol 20 (2009) 584-594
16. DeLong E., DeLong D., and Clarke-Pearson D. Comparing areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44 (1988) 837-845
17. Obuchowski N.A. Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data. Biometrics 53 (1997) 170-180
18. Obuchowski N.A., and Rockette H.E. Hypothesis testing of the diagnostic accuracy for multiple diagnostic tests: an ANOVA approach with dependent observations. Commun Stat Simulation Comput 24 (1995) 285-308