Multi-layered process modeling for business and IT alignment

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Lind, Mikael ^a   Seigerroth, Ulf ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BORÅS   (Sweden)

^b JÖNKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTION LEVEL; ACTION RESEARCH; AREAS OF CONCERNS; BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; CONSULTANCY FIRMS; FOCAL AREA; IN-PROCESS; IT ALIGNMENT; MULTI-LAYERED; ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT; PROCESS MODELING;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; RESEARCH;

ALIGNMENT;

EID: 77951738812     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2010.280     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Alter S. (2000). Same words, different meanings: are basic IS/IS concepts our self-imposed tower of Babel? Communication for the Association for Information Systems. 3 (10), April 2000
2. Bandara W., Gable G., Rosemann M. (2006) Business Process Modeling Success: An Empirically Tested Measurement Model, Twenty-Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, Milwaukee
3. Baskerville R. L., Wood-Harper, A. T. (1996) A Critical Perspective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research, Journal of Information Technology (11), 1996, pp. 235-246. (Pubitemid 126129747)
4. Bygstad B., Nielsen P. A. and Munkvold B. E. (2005). Four integration patterns: IS development as stepwise adaption of technology and organisation. In proceedings of 13th European Conference on Information Systems. University of Regensburg, May 26-28, 2005.
5. Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., & Gallo, S. (2006). How do Practitioners Use Conceptual Modeling in Practice? Data & Knowledge Engineering, 58(3), 358-380. (Pubitemid 43994225)
6. Davison R. M., Martinsons M. G., Kock N. (2004) Principles of canonical action research, Information Systems Journal (2004) 14, 65-86
7. Dietz J. L. G. (1999) Understanding and Modelling Business Processes with DEMO, Proc. 18th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER'99), Paris
8. Dursun D., Nikunj P. D., Perakath C. B. (2005) Integrated Modelling: The Key to Holistic Understanding of the Enterprise, Communication of the ACM, April 2005/Vol. 48, No. 4
9. Gibson C. F. (2003). IT-enabled Business Change: An Approach to Understanding and Managing Risk. MIS Quarterly Executive, Vol. 2 No. 2 / September 2003
10. Goldkuhl G., Ågerfalk P. J. (2005) IT Artefacts as Socio-Pragmatic Instruments: Reconciling the Pragmatic, Semiotic, and Technical, International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 1(3), 29-43, July-September 2005
11. Goldkuhl G. & Cronholm S. (2003) Multi-grounded theory - adding theoretical grounding to grounded theory, Presented at 2nd European Conference on Research Methods in Business (2ECRM), Reading
12. Goldkuhl G., Lind M. (2008) Coordination and transformation in business processes: Towards an integrated view, Business Process Management Journal, Vol 14 (6)
13. Goldkuhl G., Röstlinger A. (2002) Towards an integral understanding of organisations and information systems: Convergence of three theories, Proc of the 5th International Workshop on Organisational Semiotics, Delft
14. Grant G. G. (2003). Strategic alignment and enterprise systems implementation: the case of Metalco. Journal of Information Technology (September 2003) 18, 159-175
15. Gruber T. R. (1993) Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing, International Journal Human-Computer Studies 43, p.907-928.
16. Guarino N. (1998) Formal Ontology and Information Systems, Proceedings of FOIS'98, Trento, Italy
17. Harmon P. (2009) "The Scope and Evolution of Business Process Management" in vom Brocke J., Rosemann M. (Eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management, Springer
18. Henderson J. C., Venkatraman N. (1999) Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organisations, IBM System Journal, Vol32, NO 1, 1993; © 1993, 1999
19. Hammer M. (1990) Reengineering work: Don't automate, obliterate, Harvard Business Review, p 104-112
20. Holland C. P. & Light B. (2003). A Framework for Understanding Success and Failure in Enterprise Resource Planning System Implementation. (2003, Eds) Shanks G., Seddon P. B., Willcocks L.P. Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems - Implementing for Effectiveness. Pp180-195 Cambridge University Press 2003
21. IFIP-IFAC Task Force (1999) Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology, IFIP-IFAC Task Force on Architectures for Enterprise Integration, March 1999
22. Kotter J.P. (1996) Leading Change, Harvard Business School Press
23. Lankhorst M. (Eds., 2005) Enterprise Architecture at Work - Modelling, Communication, and Analysis, Springer
24. Langefors B. (1973) Theoretical Analysis of Information Systems. Fourth edition, Studentlitteratur, Lund
25. Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 103-131). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
26. Lind M. (2002) "Dividing Businesses into Processes - Foundations for Modelling Essentials" in Liu K., Clarke R.J., Andersen P.B., Stamper R.K., Abou-Zeid E. (Eds.) IFIP TC8/ WG8.1 Working Conference on Organizational Semiotics: Evolving a Science of Information Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers
27. Lind M., Goldkuhl G. (2003) The constituents of business interaction - generic layered patterns, Data & Knowledge Engineering, Volume 47, Issue 3, p 299-405
28. Lindgren R., Henfridsson O., Schultze U. (2004) Design Principles for Competence Management Systems: A Synthesis of Action Research Study, MIS Quarterly Vol. 28 No. 3/September 2004
29. Liu K, Sun L and Bennett K (2002) Co-Design of Business and IT Systems. Information Systems Frontiers 4(3), 251-256
30. Loucopoulos P., Kavakli E. (1995) Telelogical Approach to Requirements Engineering, International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems (IJCIS), Vol. 4, 1995, pp 45-79
31. Mathiassen L. (2002) Collaborative Practice Research, Information Technology & People (14:1), 2002, pp. 321-345.
32. Orlikowski, W.J., Hofman, J.D. (1997) An improvisational model for change management: the case of groupware. Sloan Management Science, 38(2): 11-21.
33. Peppard J. (2001) Briding the gap between the IS organization and the rest of the business: plotting a route, Information Systems Journal, Volume 11, Issue 3, Page 249-270, Jul 2001
34. Rapoport R N (1970) Three dilemmas in action research, Human Relations, Vol 23 (6), p 499-513
35. Rittgen, P. (2007) Co-designing Models for Enterprises and Information Systems - a Case for Language Integration, in Magyar, G.; Knapp, G.; Wojtkowski, W.G.; Zupancic, J. (eds): Advances in Information Systems Development: New Methods and Practice for the Networked Society. Vol 1. Springer, Berlin, pp. 73-83
36. Rosemann M., Sedera W., Gable G. (2001). Critical Success Factors of Process Modeling for Enterprise Systems. Seventh Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2001), August 3-5 2001, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
37. Soffer P., Golany B., Dori D. (2003). ERP modeling: a comprehensive approach. Journal of Information Systems, Volume 28, Issue 6, September 2003, Pages 673-690
38. Susman G. I., Evered R. D. (1978) An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 4. (Dec., 1978), pp. 582-603.
39. Ulrich F. (2002) Multi-Perspective Enterprise Modeling (MEMO) - Conceptual Framework and Modeling Languages, In proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Science - 2002
40. Vernadat F.B. (2002) Enterprise Modeling and Integration (EMI): Current Status and Research Perspectives, Annual Reviews in Control 26 (2002) 15-25
41. Ward J., Peppard J (2003) Strategic Planning for Information Systems, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd
42. Weigand H., van den Heuvel W-J. (1998) Metapatterns for Electronic Commerce Transactions based on FLBC, Proc. of 31st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 261-327
43. Winograd T., Flores F. (1986) Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design, Ablex, Norwood NJA
44. Xue L., Boqin F. (2006) A Constraint-centered Two-layered meta-model for Enterprise Modeling and Analysis, Information Technology Journal 5 (4): 709-718, 2006 (Pubitemid 44546163)