Four integration patterns: Is development as stepwise adaptation of technology and organisation

Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems, Information Systems in a Rapidly Changing Economy, ECIS 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Bygstad, Bendik ^a   Nielsen, Peter Axel ^b   Munkvold, Bjoørn Erik ^c  

^a Norwegian School of IT   (Norway)

^b AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Integration patterns; Mutual adaptation; Software development process

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL TOOL; BIG BANG; BUSINESS ORGANISATION; IMPLEMENTATION SUCCESS; INTEGRATION PATTERNS; IS DEVELOPMENT; ITERATIVE INTEGRATION; ITERATIVE SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES; MUTUAL ADAPTATION; SOCIO-TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVE; SOCIOTECHNICAL; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS; TECHNICAL INTEGRATION;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

INTEGRATION;

EID: 84871026477     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Alter, S. (2000) Same Words, Different Meanings: Are Basic IS/IT Concepts Our Self-Imposed Tower of Babel? Communications of the AIS, 3(10), 2-87.
2. Ambler, S. W. (1998) Process Patterns. Cambridge University Press.
3. Boehm, B.W. (1988) A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement, IEEE Computer, 21(5), 61-72.
4. Ciborra, C. (2000) From Control to Drift. Oxford University Press.
5. Coakes, E, Willis, D., and Lloyd-Jones, R. (2000) The New SocioTech. Graffiti on the Long Wall. London: Springer.
6. Hanseth, O. (2002) From systems and tools to networks and infrastructures. Toward a theory of ICT solutions and its design methodology implications, http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~oleha/Publications/ib-ISR-3rd-resubm2.html
7. Hanseth, O. and Monteiro, E. (1996) Inscribing Behaviour in Information Infrastructure Standards, Accounting, Management and Information Systems, 7(4), 183-211.
8. Jacobson, I., Booch, G. and Rumbaugh, R. (1999) The Unified Software Development Process, Addison Wesley, Reading.
9. Kappelman, L.A. and McLean, E. R. (1994) User Engagement in the Development, Implementation and Use of Information Technologies, in Proceedings of HICSS 27, 512-521.
10. Klein, H.K. and Myers, M. D. (1999) A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67-94.
11. Kling, R. and Scacchi, W. (1982) The Web of Computing: Computer Technology as Social Organization, in Advances in Computers, 21,1-90.
12. Lamb, R. and Kling, R. (2003) Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Informations Systems Research, MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 197-235.
13. Leonard-Barton, D. (1988) Implementation as Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Organization, Research Policy, 17(5), 251-267.
14. Lloyd, A.D., Dewar, R., and Pooley, R. (1999) Legacy Information Systems and Business Process Change: A Patterns Perspective, Communications of the AIS, 2(1).
15. Majchrzak, A., Rice, R., Malhotra, A., King, N., and Ba, S. (2000). Technology adaptation: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team, MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 569-600.
16. Microsoft (2004) Microsoft Solutions Framework. http://www.microsoft.com/ technet/itsolutions/techguide/msf/default.mspx. Accessed May 2004.
17. Mumford, E. (1995) Effective Systems Design and Requirements Analysis: The ETHICS Approach, Macmillan, Basingstoke, England.
18. Newman, M. and Robey, D. (1992) A social process model of user-analyst relationships, MIS Quarterly 16(2), 249-266.
19. Pettigrew, A. M. (1985) Contextual Research and the Study of Organizational Change Processes, in Mumford, E. (ed.), Research Methods in Information Systems, North-Holland.
20. Royce, W. (1998) Software Project Management, Addison-Wesley Longman, Reading, Mass.
21. Sauer, C. and Willcocks, L. P. (2004) Strategic Alignment Revisited: Connecting Organizational Architecture and IT Infrastructure, in Proceedings of HICSS 37, Big Island, Hawaii