Comparison of patient and doctor responses to a total hip arthroplasty clinical evaluation questionnaire

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 84, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 1745-1752

  McGee, Margaret A ^a   Howie, Donald W ^a   Ryan, Philip ^a   Moss, John R ^a   Holubowycz, Oksana T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0036799673     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200210000-00002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Harris WE. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737-55.
2. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972;54:61-76.
3. Wilson PD Jr, Amstutz HC, Czernlecki A, Salvati EA, Mendes DG. Total hip replacement with fixation by acrylic cement, A preliminary study of 100 consecutive McKee-Farrar prosthetic replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54:207-36.
4. Johanson NA, Charlson ME, Szatrowski TP, Ranawat CS. A self-administered hip-rating questionnaire for the assessment of outcome after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:587-97.
5. Gogia PP, Christensen CM, Schmldt C. Total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip: improvement in pain and functional status. Orthopedics. 1994;17:145-50.
6. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:185-90.
7. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Harris WH, Poss R, Muller ME, Siedge CB. Clinical and radiographical evaluation of total hip replacements. A standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:161-8.
8. Galante J. Evaluation of results of total hip replacement [editorial]. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:159-60.
9. Cohen JA. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educat Psychol Measure. 1972;20:37-46.
10. Cohen J. Weighted kappa. Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70:213-20.
11. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1981.
12. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-74.
13. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT Software: changes and enhancements through release 6.12. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1997. p 221-45.
14. Donner A. Sample size requirements for the comparison of two or more coefficients of inter-observer agreement. Stat Med. 1998;17:1157-68.
15. Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schumacher L, Thomas BJ, Kllgus DJ, Flnerman GA. Differences between patients' and physicians evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:835-8.
16. Fitzpatrlck R, Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, Spiegelhalter D, Cox D. Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment. BMJ. 1992;305:1074-7.
17. Bulstrode CJK. Outcome measures and their analysis. In: Pynsent PB, Fairbank JCT, Carr A, editors. Outcome measures in orthopaedics. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993. p 1-15.
18. Wright JG, Felnstein AR. Improving the reliability of orthopaedic measurements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:287-91.
19. Dolan P, Kind P. Inconsistency and health state variations. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42:609-15.
20. Wyller TB, Sveen U, Bautz-Holter E. The Barthel ADL index one year after stroke: comparison between relatives' and occupational therapist's scores. Age Ageing. 1995;24:398-401.
21. Bryant MJ, Kernohan WG, Nixon JR, Mollan RA. A statistical analysis of hip scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:705-9.
22. Keller RB, Rudicel SA, Liang MH. An Instructional Course Lecture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Outcomes research in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1562-74.
23. Hoher J, Bach T, Munster A, Boulllon B, Tiling T. Does the mode of data collection change results in a subjective knee score? Self-administration versus interview. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:642-7.
24. Stephens RJ, Hopwood P, Girling DJ, Machin D. Randomized trials with quality of life endpoints: are doctors' ratings of patients' physical symptoms interchangeable with patients' self ratings? Qual Life Res. 1997;6:225-36.
25. Britton AR, Murray DW, Bulstrode CJ, McPherson K, Denham RA. Pain levels after total hip replacement: their use as endpoints for survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:93-8.
26. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. The problem of 'noise' in monitoring patient-based outcomes: generic, disease-specific and site-specific instruments for total hip replacement. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996;1:224-31.
27. Shrout PE. Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Stat Methods Med Res. 1998:7:301-17.
28. Berry DJ, Kessler M, Morrey BF. Maintaining a hip registry for 25 years. Mayo Clinic experience. Clin Orthop. 1997:344:61-8.