Standards initiatives for software product line engineering and management within the international organization for standardization

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Käkölä, Timo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

International organization for standardization; Software product line body of knowledge; Software product line engineering and management

Indexed keywords

BODY OF KNOWLEDGE; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATIONS; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE ENGINEERINGS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COORDINATION REACTIONS; CURRICULA; ENGINEERING; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; STANDARDIZATION;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 77951734311     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2010.348     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Bayer, J., Gerard, S., Haugen, Ø., Mansell, J. X, Møller- Pedersen, B., Oldevik, J., Tessier P., Thibault, J-P and Widen T. (2006). Consolidated Product Line Variability Modeling. In T. Käkölä & J.C. Dueñas (Eds.), Software Product Lines: Research Issues in Engineering and Management, Springer, 195-241.
2. Brown, S. L. and Eisenhardt, K.M. (1995). Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions. Academy of Management Review 20(2), 343-378.
3. Carmel, E. and Agarwal, R. (2001). Tactical Approaches for Alleviating Distance in Global Software Development. IEEE Software, 18(2), 22-29. (Pubitemid 32293336)
4. Carmel, E. and Agarwal, R. (2002). The Maturation of Offshore Sourcing of Information Technology Work. MIS Quarterly Executive, 1(2), 65-78.
5. Clements, P. and Northrop, L. (2001). Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley: SEI Series in Software Engineering.
6. Cusumano, M. A., and Selby, R. W. (1995). Microsoft® Secrets. New York, NY: Free Press.
7. Gomaa, H. (2004). Designing Software Product Lines with UML: From Use Cases to Pattern-Based Software Architectures. Software Product Lines, Third International Conference, SPLC 2004.
8. Herbsleb, J.D. and Moitra, D. (2001). Guest Editors' Introduction: Global Software Development. IEEE Software, 18(2), 16-20.
9. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J. and Ram, S. (2004). Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105.
10. ISO (2005). ISO/IEC 19501 Information Technology- Open Distributed Processing-Unified Modeling Language (UML) Version 1.4.2. International Organization for Standardization, http://www.iso.org.
11. ISO (2009a). ISO/IEC NP 26520 Software and Systems Engineering - Reference Model for Software and Systems Product Lines. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 WG4 Working draft 1.0.
12. ISO (2009b). ISO/IEC NP 26521 Software and Systems Engineering - Tools and Methods of Requirements Engineering and Management for Software and Systems Product Lines. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 WG4 Working draft 1.0.
13. Koivulahti-Ojala, M. and Käkölä, T. (2010). Framework for Evaluating the Version Management Capabilities of a Class of UML Modeling Tools from the Viewpoint of Multi-site, Multi-partner Product Line Organizations. In Proceedings of 43rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS-43). IEEE.
14. Käkölä, T. (2008). Best Practices for International eSourcing of Software Products and Services. In Proceedings of 41st Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS-41). IEEE.
15. Käkölä, T. and Dueñas, J. (Eds.) (2006). Software Product Lines: Research Issues in Engineering and Management. Springer.
16. Käkölä, T., Koivulahti-Ojala, M., and Liimatainen, J. (2009). An Information Systems Design Product Theory for the Class of Integrated Requirements and Release Management Systems. Software Process: Improvement and Practice (in press).
17. Van der Linden, F., Schmid, K. and Rommes, E. (2007). Software Product Lines in Action: The Best Industrial Practice in Product Line Engineering. Springer.
18. Meyer, M.H. and Selinger, R. (1998). Product Platforms in Software Development. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 61-74.
19. Northrop, L. and Clements, P. (2007). A Framework for Software Product Line Practice, Version 5.0. Software Engineering Institute. http://www.sei.cmu. edu/productlines/framework.html.
20. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., and Van der Linden, F. (2005). Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles, and Techniques. Springer.
21. Ramasubbu, N., Krishnan, M. S. and Kompalli, P. (2005). Leveraging Global Resources: A Process Maturity Framework for Managing Distributed Development. IEEE Software, 22(3), 80-86. (Pubitemid 40889812)
22. Reuys, A., Reis, S., Kamsties, E., and Pohl, K. (2006). The ScenTED Method for Testing Software Product Lines. In T. Käkölä & J.C. Dueñas (Eds.), Software Product Lines: Research Issues in Engineering and Management, Springer, 479-520.
23. Rosenmuller, M., Siegmund, N., Saake, G. and Apel S. (2008). Code Generation to Support Static and Dynamic Composition of Software Product Lines. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Generative Programming and Component Engineering, 3-12.
24. Ziadi, T., Hélouët, L. and Jézéquel, J.M. (2003). Towards a UML Profile for Software Product Lines. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Product Family Engineering (PFE-5). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3014, Springer, 129-139 (Pubitemid 38803401)
25. Ziadi, T. and Jézéquel, J.-M. (2006). Software Product Line Engineering with the UML: Deriving Products. In T. Käkölä & J.C. Dueñas (Eds.), Software Product Lines: Research Issues in Engineering and Management, Springer, 556-588.