Usability evaluation of a learning management system

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Blecken, Alexander ^a   Brüggemann, Daniel ^a   Marx, Wiebke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADERBORN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE E-LEARNING; EVALUATION METHOD; LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; QUANTITATIVE DATA; TEACHING AND LEARNING; USABILITY EVALUATION; USABILITY EVALUATION METHODS; USER GROUPS; WEB 2.0; WEBLOGS;

MANAGEMENT; SURVEYS;

USABILITY ENGINEERING;

EID: 77951725224     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2010.422     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Beier, M. and Von Gizycki, V., Usability - Nutzerfreundliches Web-Design, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2000.
2. Brooke, J., SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale, In: JORDAN, P.W.; THOMAS, B.; WEERDMEESTER, B.A.; MCCLELLAND, I.L. (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry, London: Taylor and Francis, 1996.
3. Dahm, M., Grundlagen der Mensch-Computer-Interaktion, Mnchen: Pearson Education, 2006.
4. DIN EN ISO 9241, 2006. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs), 1998, retitled to: Ergonomics of Human System Interaction.
5. DIN EN ISO 9241 part 11, 2006. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs): Guidance on usability, 1998, retitled to: Ergonomics of Human System Interaction: Guidance on usability.
6. Harms, I. and Schweibenz, W., 2000. Testing Web Usability, Information Management & Consulting, imc information multimedia communication AG, Saarbrcken, pp. 61-66.
7. Hollingsed, T. and Novick, D. G., Usability Inspection Methods after 15 Years of Research and Practice, In: SIGDOC '07: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication, ACM, New York, pp. 249-255, 2007.
8. Keil, R. and Selke, H., Zwischen Web-Prsenz und Grids: Portale als Mittel der ko-aktiven Wissensorganisation, In: GAISER, B.; HESSE, F.W.; LUETKE-ENTRUP, M. (Eds.), Bildungsportale: Potenziale und Perspektiven netzbasierter Bildungsressourcen, Oldenbourg Verlag, Mnchen, pp. 235-248, 2007.
9. Mhring, W. and Schltz, D., Die Befragung in der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2003.
10. Mummendey, H. D. and Grau, I., Die Fragebogen-Methode, Hogrefe Verlag, Gttingen, 2008.
11. Nielsen, J., Usability Engineering, Academic Press Limited, London, 1993.
12. Nielsen, J., Why You Only Need to Test With 5 Users, http://www.useit. com/alertbox/20000319.html; accessed on February 19, 2009.
13. opensTeam, http://www.open-steam.org; accessed on August 25, 2009.
14. Rubin, J. and Chisnell, D., Handbook of Usability Testing, Second Edition: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests, Wiley Publishing, Indianapolis, 2008.
15. Sarodnick, F. and Brau, H., Methoden der Usability Evaluation. Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung, Verlag Hans Huber, Bern, 2006.
16. SurveyMonkey, http://www.surveymonkey.com; accessed on June 10, 2009.
17. Szwillus, G., Usability Engineering: Grundlegende Begriffe, Beispiele, Universitt Paderborn, Lecture Notes, 2005. Available online at http://wwwcs.unipaderborn.de/cs/ag-szwillus/lehre/lehre.html; accessed on February 8, 2009.
18. Vanderdonckt, J., Development milestones towards a tool for working with guidelines, Interacting with Computers 12 (2), pp. 81-118, 1999.
19. Westermann, R., Merkmale und Varianten von Evaluationen: berblick und Klassifikation, Zeitschrift fr Psychologie, 210 (1), Gttingen: Hogrefe-Verlag, pp. 4-26, 2002.