Governing civil society: The political logic of NGO-state relations under dictatorship

Voluntas

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 220-239

  Heurlin, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Asia; Civil society; Corporatism; Cross national comparisons; Development; Dictatorship; Government voluntary sector relations; NGO state relations; Non governmental organizations; Non profit theory

Indexed keywords

CIVIL SOCIETY; CORPORATE STRATEGY; DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INCENTIVE; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; STATE-LOCAL RELATIONS;

FAR EAST;

EID: 77951723040     PISSN: 09578765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11266-009-9103-2     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aspinall, E. (1996). The broadening base of political opposition in Indonesia. In G. Rodan (Ed.), Political oppositions in industrializing Asia (pp. 215-240). New York: Routledge.
2. Aspinall, E. (2005). Opposing Suharto: Compromise, resistance, and regime change in Indonesia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3. Bratton, M. (1989). The politics of government-NGO relations in Africa. World Development, 17(4), 569-587.
4. Brownlee, J. (2007). Authoritarianism in an age of democratization. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Chan, K.-M. (2005). The development of NGOs under a post-Totalitarian regime. In R. P. Weller (Ed.), Civil life, globalization and political change in Asia (pp. 20-41). London and New York: Routledge.
6. Clarke, G. (1998). The politics of NGOs in South-East Asia: Participation and protest in the Philippines. London; New York: Routledge.
7. Crouch, H. (1979). Patrimonialism and military rule in Indonesia. World Politics, 31(4), 571-587.
8. Dickson, B. J. (1997). Democratization in China and Taiwan: The adaptability of Leninist parties. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Dickson, B. J. (2003). Red capitalists in China: The party, private entrepreneurs, and prospects for political change. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Eldridge, P. J. (1989). NGOs in Indonesia: Popular movement or arm of government? Clayton, VIC, Australia: Centre of Southeastern Asian Studies, Monash University.
11. Eldridge, P. J. (1995). Non-government organizations and democratic participation in Indonesia. Kuala Lumpur; New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Foster, K. W. (2001). Associations in the embrace of an authoritarian state: State domination of society? Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(4), 84-109.
13. Foster, K. W. (2002). Embedded within state agencies: Business associations in Yantai. The China Journal, 47, 41-65.
14. Geddes, B. (1999a). Authoritarian breakdown: Empirical test of a game theoretic argument. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Conference, Atlanta.
15. Geddes, B. (1999b). What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 115-144.
16. Goodman, R., & White, G. (1998). Welfare orientalism and the search for an Asian model. In R. Goodman, G. White, & H.-j. Kwon (Eds.), The East Asian welfare model: Welfare orientalism and the state (xvii, 206 pp). London, New York: Routledge.
17. Hadiwinata, B. S. (2003). The politics of NGOs in Indonesia: Developing democracy and managing a movement. London; New York: RoutledgeCurzon.
18. Hsiao, H.-H. M. (2005). NGOs, the state and democracy under globalization. In R. P. Weller (Ed.), Civil life, globalization, and political change in Asia: Organizing between family and state (pp. 42-57). London, New York: Routledge.
19. Kawanaka, T. (2002). The Philippines: From agents to political actors. In S. Shigetomi (Ed.), The state and NGOs: Perspectives from Asia (pp. 110-124). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
20. Kennedy, S. (2005). The business of lobbying in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. King, D. Y. (1982). Indonesia's new order as a bureaucratic polity, a neopatrimonial regime or bureaucratic-authoritarian regime: What difference does it make? In B. R. O. G. Anderson & A. Kahin (Eds.), Interpreting Indonesian politics: Thirteen contributions to the debate (pp. 104-116). Ithica: Cornell.
22. Lehmbruch, G., & Schmitter, P. C. (1982). Patterns of corporatist policy-making. London; Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
23. Ma, Q. (2002). Defining Chinese nongovernmental organizations. Voluntas, 13(2), 113-130.
24. Ma, Q. (2005). Non-governmental organizations in contemporary China: Paving the way to a civil society? New York, NY: Routledge.
25. Mackie, J. (1993). Indonesia: Economic growth and depoliticization. In J. W. Morley (Ed.), Driven by growth (pp. 123-141). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
26. Martens, S. (2006). Public participation with Chinese characteristics: Citizen consumers in China's environmental management. Environmental Politics, 15(2), 211-230.
27. Nathan, A. J., & Gilley, B. (2002). China's new rulers: The secret files. New York: New York Review of Books.
28. Norlund, I. (2006). The emerging civil society: An initial assessment of civil society in Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam: Vietnam Institute of Development Studies.
29. Pekkanen, R. (2006). Japan's dual civil society: Members without advocates. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30. Riker, J. V. (1995). Contending perspectives for interpreting government-NGO relations in South and Southeast Asia: Constraints, challenges and the search for common ground in rural development. In N. Heyzer, J. V. Riker, & A. B. Quizon (Eds.), Government-NGO relations in Asia (pp. 91-130). Kaula Lampur: Asian and Pacific Development Center.
31. Sakai, Y. (2002). Indonesia: Flexible NGOs vs. inconsistent state control. In S. Shigetomi (Ed.), The state and NGOs: Perspectives from Asia (pp. 161-177). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
32. Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas, 9(3), 213-248.
33. Schmitter, P. (1979). Still a century of corporatism? In P. C. Schmitter & G. Lembruch (Eds.), Trends towards corporatist intermediation (pp. 7-48). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
34. Silliman, G. S., & Noble, L. G. (1998). Organizing for democracy: NGOs, civil society, and the Philippine State. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press.
35. Smith, B. (2006). Life of the party: The origins of regime breakdown and persistence under single-party rule. World Politics, 57(2), 421-451.
36. Suzuki, C. (2002). Vietnam: Control of NGOs by NGOs. In S. Shigetomi (Ed.), The state and NGOs: Perspectives from Asia (pp. 145-160). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
37. Teiwes, F. (1997). The establishment and cosolidation of the new regime, 1949-57. In R. MacFarquhar (Ed.), The politics of China: The eras of Mao and Deng (pp. 5-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Teiwes, F. C. (2001). Normal politics with Chinese characteristics. The China Journal, 45, 69-82.
39. Terao, T. (2002). Taiwan: From subjects of opression to the instruments of 'Taiwanization'. In S. Shigetomi (Ed.), The State and NGOs: Perspectives from Asia (pp. 263-287). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
40. Walder, A. G. (1986). Communist neo-traditionalism: Work and authority in Chinese industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41. Waldner, D. (1999). State building and late development. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42. Weller, R. P. (2005). Civil life, globalization, and political change in Asia: Organizing between family and state. London; New York: Routledge.
43. White, G., Howell, J., et al. (1996). In search of civil society: Market reform and social change in contemporary China. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Wu, F. (2002). New partners or old brothers: GONGOs in transnational environmental advocacy in China. China Environment Series, 5, 45-58.
45. Zhang, L., Nathan, A. J., et al. (2002). The Tiananmen papers. New York: Public Affairs.
46. Zhang, Z., & Sun, C. (2006). An analysis of a survey of inner Mongolian NGOs. Journal of Inner Mongolia Finance and Economics College, (3), 97-100.