Using an annealing mediator to solve the prisoners’ dilemma in the negotiation of complex contracts

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2531, Issue , 2002, Pages 194-202

  Klein, Mark ^a   Faratin, Peyman ^a   Bar Yam, Yaneer ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b NEW ENGLAND COMPLEX SYSTEMS INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; NEGOTIATING AGENTS; NEGOTIATION ALGORITHM; REAL-WORLD; SOCIAL WELFARE; TRUTH-TELLING; UTILITY FUNCTIONS;

INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EID: 77951709138     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36378-5_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Faratin, P., C. Sierra, and N.R. Jennings, Using similarity criteria to make negotiation tradeoffs. Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems. IEEE Comput. Soc., 2000
2. Ehtamo, H., E. Ketteunen, and R. Hamalainen, Searching for Joint Gains in Multi-Party Negotiations. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001. 1(30): p. 54-69
3. Bar-Yam, Y., Dynamics of complex systems. 1997, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley. xvi, 848
4. Klein, M., P. Faratin, H. Sayama, and Y. Bar-Yam. Negotiating Complex Contracts. in Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 2002. Bologna Italy: AAAI Press
5. Raiffa, H., The art and science of negotiation. 1982, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. x, 373
6. Axelrod, R., The Evolution Of Cooperation. 1984: Basic Books
7. Kauffman, S.A., The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. 1993: Oxford University Press.