Business process lines to deal with the variability

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Rolland, Colette ^a   Nurcan, Selmin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 1 PANTHÉON SORBONNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS GOALS; BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; DIFFERENT DOMAINS; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY INDUSTRIES; IN-PROCESS; ORGANIZATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION; ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS; ORGANIZATIONAL SETTING; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 77951707011     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2010.88     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Antón, A. I., McCracken, W. M. and Potts, C., "Goal Decomposition and Scenario Analysis in Business Process Reengineering", CAiSE '94, The Netherlands, 1994, pp. 94-104.
2. Antón, A.I., "Goal based requirements analysis", ICRE'96, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 1996, pp. 136-144
3. Barrios, J., and Nurcan, S., "Model Driven Architectures for Enterprise Information Systems", CAISE'04, Latvia, Springer Verlag, 2004.
4. Bosch J., Florijn G., Greefhorst D., Kuusela J., Obbink H., andPohl K., "Variability issues in Software Product Lines", 4th Int. Workshop on Product Family Engineering, Bilbao, Spain, 2001.
5. Bubenko, J., "Enterprise Modeling", Ingénierie des Systèmes d'Information, 2(6), 1994.
6. Dadam, P., Reichert, M. and Rinderle, S., "Evaluation of Correctness Criteria For Dynamic Workflow Changes", BPM'03, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2003, pp. 41-57. (Pubitemid 36767865)
7. Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A. and Fickas, S., "Goal directed requirements acquisition", Science of Computer Programming, 20(1-2), 1993, pp. 3-50.
8. Dellen, B., Maurer, F., and Pews, G., "Knowledge Based Techniques to Increase the Flexibility of Workflow Management", Data and Knowledge Engineering, 23(3), North Holland, 1997.
9. Dietz J.L.G., "Basic Notions Regarding Business Processes and Supporting Information Systems", BPMDS'04 Workshop (CAISE), Latvia, Riga, 2004, pp.160-168.
10. Eriksson, H.-E., and Penker, M., Business modeling with UML-Business patterns at work, J. Wiley, New-York, 2000.
11. Faustmann, G., "Enforcement vs. Freedom of Action- An Integrated Approach to Flexible Workflow Enactment". Workshop on Adaptive Workflow Systems. CSCW, Seattle, USA, 1998
12. Grosz G., Loucopoulos P., Rolland C., and Nurcan S. "A Framework for Generic Patterns Dedicated to the Management of Change in the Electricity Supply Industry", DEXA '98 Workshops, 1998.
13. Hammer, M., and Champy, J., Reengineering the Corporation-A manifesto for Business Revolution, Harper business, 1994.
14. Harel, D., "STATEMATE: A working environment for the development of complex reactive systems", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 16(4), 1990, pp.403-414. (Pubitemid 20712683)
15. Jarzabek, S., and Ling, T.W., "Model-based support for business reengineering", Information and Software Technology, 38(5), 1996, pp. 355-374.
16. Kang K., Cohen S., Hess J., Novak W., and Peterson A.,"Feature- Oriented Domain analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study"., Technical report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Carnegie Mellon University, 1990.
17. Lee, J., "Extending the Potts and Bruns Model for Recording Design Rationale", ICSE'91, Austin, Texas, 1991, pp. 114-125. (Pubitemid 21689990)
18. Lehman, M.M., Process Models, Process Programs, Programming Support, ICSE'87, 1987.
19. McNaugthon R., and Yamada H., "Regular expressions and state graphs for automata", IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers, EC-9, 1960, pp. 39-47.
20. Marca, D.A., and McGowan, C.L., IDEF0/SADT: Business Process and Enterprise Modeling, Eclectic Solutions, Inc, San Diego, 1993.
21. McLean, A., Moran, T., and Young, R.M., "Design Rationale: the argument behind the artifact". CHI'93, 1989, 247-256.
22. Neiger, D., and Churilov, L., "Goal-Oriented Business Process Modeling with EPCs and Value-Focused Thinking", LNCS Vol. 3080, 2004, pp. 98-115. (Pubitemid 38889005)
23. Nurcan, S. and Edme, M.-H., "Intention Driven Modelling for Flexible Workflow Applications". Spec. issue of the Software Process: Improvement and Practice Journal on "Business Process Management, Development and Support", 2005, 10(4).
24. Nurcan, S., Etien, A., Kaabi, A., Zoukar, I., and Rolland, C., "A Strategy Driven Business Process Modelling Approach", Spec. issue of the Business Process Management Journal on "Goal-oriented business process modeling", Emerald, 2005, 11(6).
25. S. Nurcan., "A survey on the flexibility requirements related to business processes and modeling artifacts", HICSS'08, Big Island, Hawaii, USA, 2008.
26. Ommering R.V., "Building product populations with software components", ICSE'02, Orlando, Florida, 2002.
27. Ould, M.A., Business Processes: Modeling and Analysis for Reengineering and Improvement, J. Wiley & Sons, 1995.
28. Papazoglou M-P., and Georgakopoulos D., "Service-Oriented Computing", Communications of the ACM Journal, 46(10), October 2003, pp. 24-28.
29. Potts, C., "Fitness for Use: The System Quality that Matters Most", REFSQ'97, Barcelona, Spain, 1997, pp. 15-28.
30. Regev, G., and Wegmann, A., "A Regulation-Based View on Business Process and Supporting System Flexibility" BPMDS'05 Workshop (CAISE), 2005, pp. 91-98.
31. Rolland, C., Souveyet, C. and Ben Achour, C., "Guiding Goal Modelling using Scenarios", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Special Issue on Scenario Management, 1998, 24(12), pp. 1055-1071.
32. Rolland, C., Loucopoulos, P., Kavakli, V., and Nurcan, S., "Intention based modelling of organisational change: an experience report", EMMSAD'99 (CAISE), Germany, 1999
33. Rolland, C., and Prakash N., "Bridging the gap between Organizational needs and ERP functionality", Requirement Engineering Journal, Vol.5, 2000, pp180-193.
34. Rolland, C., Salinesi, C., and Etien, A., "Eliciting Gaps in Requirements Change", Requirements Engineering Journal, 2004, 9(1), pp. 1-15.
35. Rosemann, M., and Recker, J., "Context-aware Process Design Exploring the Extrinsic Drivers for Process Flexibility", BPMDS'06 (CAISE), Luxembourg, 2006.
36. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., and W. Lorensen, Object Oriented Modeling and Design, Prentice-Hall, New-York, 1991.
37. Rummler, G.A. and Brache, A. P., Improving Performance, Jossey-Bass Publishers, Indianapolis, 1995.
38. Saidani, O., and Nurcan, S., "A Role-Based Approach for Modelling Flexible Business Processes", BPMDS'06, (CAISE), Luxembourg, 2006.
39. Salinesi, C. and Ivankina, E., "Guiding Use Case Discovery By Analysing Threats", CAISE'04, Springer Verlag, Riga, Latvia, 2004.
40. Medina-Mora, R., Winograd, T., Flores, R., and Flores, F., "The Action Workflow Approach to Workflow Management Technology", CSCW'92, Toronto, Canada, 1992.
41. Soffer, P., and Rolland, C., "Combining Intention-Oriented and State-Based Process Modelling", ER'05, 2005, pp. 47-62.
42. Svahnberg, M., Van Gurp J., and Bosch J., "On the notion of variability in Software Product Lines", Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software architecture, 2001.
43. Thevenet, L.-H., and Camille S.,. "Aligning IS to organization's strategy: the INSTAL method", CAISE'07, Trondheim, Norway, 2007.
44. th IEEE Symposium on Requirements Engineering, Toronto, Canada, 2001.
45. Yu, E.S.K., and Mylopoulos, J., "Using Goals, Rules and Methods to Support Reasoning in Business Process Reengineering", Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, Vol. 5, 1996