Cross-Calibration and Comparison of Variability in 2 Bone Densitometers in a Research Setting: The Framingham Experience

Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 210-218

  Gagnon, David R ^a,b   McLean, Robert R ^c,d   Hannan, Marian T ^a,c,d   Cupples, L Adrienne ^a   Hogan, Mary ^c   Kiel, Douglas P ^c,d  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center   (United States)

^c Hebrew Senior Life   (United States)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone; cross calibration; dual x ray absorptiometry; mineral density

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; BONE DENSITOMETRY; BONE DENSITY; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HIP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; BODY POSTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; FEMUR; IMAGE PROCESSING; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; VERY ELDERLY;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE DENSITY; CALIBRATION; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LINEAR MODELS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; POSTURE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 77951652555     PISSN: 10946950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2010.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. The Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference. Technical standardization for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom 7 (2004) 27-36
2. Shepherd J.A., and Lu Y. A generalized least significant change for individuals measured on different DXA systems. J Clin Densitom 10 (2007) 249-258
3. Shepherd J.A., Morgan S.L., and Lu Y. Comparing BMD results between two similar DXA systems using the generalized least significant change. J Clin Densitom 11 (2008) 237-242
4. Kiel D.P., Mercier C.A., Dawson-Hughes B., et al. The effects of analytic software and scan analysis technique on the comparison of dual X-ray absorptiometry with dual photon absorptiometry of the hip in the elderly. J Bone Miner Res 10 (1995) 1130-1136
5. Oldroyd B., Smith A.H., and Truscott J.G. Cross-calibration of GE/Lunar pencil and fan-beam dual energy densitometers-bone mineral density and body composition studies. Eur J Clin Nutr 57 (2003) 977-987
6. Blake G.M., Harrison E.J., and Adams J.E. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system. Calcif Tissue Int 75 (2004) 7-14
7. Pearson D., Horton B., and Green D.J. Cross calibration of DXA as part of an equipment replacement program. J Clin Densitom 9 (2006) 287-294
8. Hannan M.T., Felson D.T., Dawson-Hughes B., et al. Risk factors for longitudinal bone loss in elderly men and women: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 15 (2000) 710-720
9. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
10. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT® 9.1 user's guide (2004), SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC
11. Hans D.B., Shepherd J.A., Schwartz E.N., et al. Peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the management of osteoporosis: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions. J Clin Densitom 11 (2008) 188-206
12. Rubin D.B. Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J Am Stat Assoc 91 (1996) 473-489