Victims on view: Are victims served by the principle of open justice?

Crime, Victims and Justice: Essays on Principles and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 112-125

  Malsch, Marijke ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951625871     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315094335-11     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. J. Braithwaite, Crime, Shame and Reintegration (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).
2. M.E.I. Brienen & E.H. Hoegen, Victims of Crime in 22 Criminal Justice Systems: The Implementation of Recommendation (85) 11 of the Council of Europe on the Position of the Victim in the Framework of Criminal Law and Procedure (Wolf Legal Productions, Nijmegen, 2000).
3. Y. Buruma, De aandacht van de strafrechter (Gouda Quint, Arnhem, 1996).
4. R. Davis, ‘Impact Statements: Not Having Much Effecť NOVA Newsletter (9, 1992), pp. 1-7.
5. R.D. Davis & B. Smith, ‘The Effect of Victim Impact Statements on Sentencing Decisions: A Test in an Urban Setting’ Justice Quarterly (3, 1994), pp. 453-469.
6. J.W. De Keijser, Punishment and Purpose: From Moral Theory to Punishment in Action (Thela Thesis, Amsterdam, 2000).
7. J.W. De Keijser, & M. Malsch, ‘Is spreken zilver en zwijgen goud? Spreekrecht en het ontstemde slachtoffer’ Delikt & Delinkwent (1, 2002), pp. 5-20.
8. E. Erez & P. Tontodonato, ‘Victim Participation in Sentencing and Satisfaction with Justice’ Justice Quarterly, (9, 1992), pp. 393-427.
9. E. Erez, ‘Victim Participation in Sentencing: And the Debate Goes On...’ International Review of Victimology (3, 1994), pp. 17-32.
10. E. Erez & L. Roeger, ‘The Effect of Victim Impact Statements on Sentencing Patterns and Outcomes: The Australian experience’ Journal of Criminal Justice (23, 1995), pp. 363-375.
11. E. Erez, L. Roeger & F. Morgan, ‘Victim Harm, Impact Statements and Victim Satisfaction with Justice: An Australian Experience’ International Review of Victimology (5, 1997) pp. 37-60.
12. R. Hoekstra & M. Malsch, ‘The Principle of Open Justice in The Netherlands’ in P.J. van Koppen & S. Penrod ed., Adversarial Versus Inquisitorial Justice (Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, 2003).
13. H.J.R. Kaptein, ‘Materieelrechtelijke (de)legitimatie van Strafvorderlijke openbaarheid en publiciteiť in C.J. de Poot & M. Malsch ed., Bivakmuts, politiepet en toga: Wisselwerking tussen criminaliteit en rechtshandhaving (Boom Juridische uitgevers, Den Haag, 2001), pp. 121-148.
14. M. Malsch & R. Carrière, ‘Victims’ Wishes for Compensation: The Immaterial Aspect’ Journal of Criminal Justice (3, 1999), pp. 239-249.
15. M. Malsch & R. Hoekstra, ‘De publieke tribune: Controiemiddel voor de rechtspraak of opvangruimte voor daklozen?’ Journal of Criminal Justice (29, 1999), pp. 737-755.
16. M. Malsch & J.F. Nijboer ed., Complex cases: Perspectives on The Netherlands criminal justice system (Thela Thesis, Amsterdam, 1999).
17. M. Malsch, ‘Openbaarheid en hersteľ Tijdschrift voor herstelrecht (3, 2001), pp. 33-43.
18. J.F Nijboer & A. Sennef, ‘Justification’ in M. Malsch & J.F. Nijboer ed., Complex Cases: Perspectives on The Netherlands Criminal Justice System (Thela Thesis, Amsterdam, 1999), pp. 11-27.
19. D. Roche, Restorative Justice: The Need For Public Accountability and the Role of Open Justice (Paper presented at the Third International Meeting on Restorative Justice for Juveniles, Leuven, 1999).
20. C.A. Studebaker & S. Penrod, ‘Pretrial Publicity: The Media, the Law and Common Sense’ Psychology, Public Policy, and Law (2/3, 1997), pp. 428-460.
21. B. Swart, ‘The European Convention as an Invigorator of Domestic Law in The Netherlands’ Journal of Law and Society (1, 1999), pp. 38-47.
22. U. Van de Pol, Openbaar terecht: Een onderzoek van het openbaarheidsbeginsel in de strafrechtspleging (Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 1986).
23. J.B.J. Van der Leij, Bejegening op maat: De behandeling van getuigen in strafzaken (Proefschrift Universiteit Leiden, Kluwer, Deventer, 2002).
24. N. Walker, Why Punish? (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991).
25. J.M. Wemmers, Evaluatie Terwee: Slachtofferonderzoek wet en riehtlijn Terwee: Eindrapport (Ministerie van Justiţie, Centrale Direcţie Wetenschapsbeleid en Ontwikkeling, The Hague, 1994).
26. J.M. Wemmers, Victims in the criminal justice system (WODC/Kugler Publications, Den Haag/Amsterdam/New York, 1996).