Victims' wishes for compensation: The immaterial aspect

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 239-247

  Malsch, Marijke ^a   Carrière, Raphaela ^b  

^a NISCALE   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033130338     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2352(98)00062-2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Braithwaite, J., and Mugford, S. (1994). Conditions of successful reintegration ceremonies: Dealing with juvenile offenders. British Journal of Criminology 2:139-71.
3. Brienen, M., and Hoegen, E. (1988). Information systems for victims of crime: Results of comparative research. International Review of Victimology 5:163-88.
4. Carrière, R. M., Malsch, M., Vermunt, R., and De Keijser, J. W. (1998). An exploratory scenario study on the effects of material and immaterial damage on victim-offender negotiations. International Review of Victimology 5:221-34.
5. Davis, R. C., and Smith, B. E. (1994). Victim impact statements and victim satisfaction: An unfulfilled promise. Journal of Criminal Justice 22:1-12.
6. Erez, E. (1994). Victim participation in sentencing: And the debate goes on . . . International Review of Victimology 3:17-32.
7. Erez, E., and Bienkowski, E. (1993). Victim participation in proceedings and satisfaction with justice in the continental systems: The case of Poland. Journal of Criminal Justice 21:47-60.
8. Erez, E., and Tontodonato, P. (1990). The effect of victim participation in sentencing on sentence outcome. Criminology 28:451-74.
9. Erez, E., and Tontodonato, P. (1992). Victim participation in sentencing and satisfaction with justice. Justice Quarterly 9:394-415.
10. Erez, E., Roeger, L., and Morgan, F. (1997). Victim harm, impact statements and victim satisfaction. International Review of Victimology 1:37-60.
11. Gardner, J. (1990). Victims and Criminal Justice. Research report. South Australia: Office of Crime Statistics, Attorney General's Department.
12. Kool, R. (1993). Onvolmaakte genoegdoening: Civielrechtelijke schadevergoeding bij sexueel geweld, een jurisprudentieonderzoek. Nemesis 5:150-7.
13. Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.
14. Malsch, M., and Carrière, R. M. (1996). Dading en bemiddeling: Geschikt voor het strafrecht? Recht der Werkelijkheid 1:25-38.
15. Malsch, M., and Kleijne, G. (1995). Restorative Aspects in the Criminal Justice System of The Netherlands. Report NSCR WD 95-05. Leiden: NSCR.
16. Shapland, J., Willmore, J., and Duff, P. (1985). Victims in the Criminal Justice System. Aldershot, Great Britain: Gower Publishing Company Limited.
17. Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
18. Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law and Society Review 22:103-35.
19. Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Psychology 25:115-91.
20. Umbreit, M. S. (1990). The meaning of fairness to burglary victims. In Criminal Justice, Restitution, and Reconciliation, eds. B. Galaway and J. Hudson. Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.
21. Van Koppen, P. J., and Malsch, M. (1991). Defendants and one-shotters win after all: Compliance with court decisions in civil cases. Law and Society Review 4:803-20.
22. Wemmers, J. M. (1994). Evaluatie Terwee: Slachtofferonderzoek Wet En Richtlijn Terwee: Eindrapport. Gravenhage: Ministerie van Justitie, Centrale Directie Wetenschapsbeleid en Ontwikkeling.
23. Wemmers, J. M. (1996). Victims in the Criminal Justice System. Den Haag/Amsterdam/New York: WODC/Kugler Publications.
24. Zedner, L. (1994). Reparation and retribution: Are they reconcilable? Modern Law Review 57:228-50.