Fragility analysis of a highway over-crossing bridge with consideration of soil-structure interactions

Structure and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 6, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 159-178

  Kwon, Oh Sung ^a   Elnashai, Amr S ^b  

^a Missouri University of Science and Technology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridge analysis; Fragility analysis; Soil structure interaction

Indexed keywords

BRIDGE ANALYSIS; BRIDGE CONFIGURATION; BRIDGE SYSTEMS; CRITICAL COMPONENT; FE MODEL; FOUNDATION SYSTEMS; FRAGILITY ANALYSIS; FRAGILITY CURVES; IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; INELASTIC RESPONSE; MODELLING METHOD; PILE ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DEMANDS; SEISMIC FRAGILITY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT (3D FE);

ABUTMENTS (BRIDGE); FOUNDATIONS; PILES; SEISMOLOGY; SOILS; SPRINGS (COMPONENTS); STREAM FLOW; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 77951623954     PISSN: 15732479     EISSN: 17448980     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15732470802663870     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. American Concrete Institute (ACI) 318, 2002. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-02) and commentary (ACI 318R-02). ACI Committee.
2. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), 2005. Specification for structural steel buildings. Chicago, IL: AISC Inc.
3. Barlett, F.M. and MacGregor, J.G., 1996. Statistical analysis of the compressive strength of concrete in structures. ACI Material Journal, 93 (2), 158-168.
4. Brown, D.A. and Reese, L.C., 1985. Behavior of a large-scale pile group subjected to cyclic lateral loading. Department of Research, FHWA, Washington DC and US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, Report to the Minerals Management Services, US Department of Interior, Reston, VA.
5. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 1988. Memo to designers 5-1. Sacramento, CA: Division of Structures, Caltrans.
6. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 1989. Bridge design aids 14-1. Sacramento, CA: Caltrans.
7. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2004. Seismic design criteria, Version 1.3. Sacramento, CA: Caltrans.
8. Chryssanthopoulos, M.K., Dymiotis, C. and Kappos, A.J., 2000. Probabilistic evaluation of behaviour factors in EC8-designed R/C frames. Engineering Structures, 22 (8), 1028-1041.
9. Cornell, C.A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R.O. and Foutch, D.A., 2002. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128, 526-533.
10. Elnashai, A.S., Papanikolaou, V. and Lee, D., 2002. ZEUS NL - a system for inelastic analysis of structures. Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Program Release September.
11. Ensoft Inc., 2005. LPile plus student edition electronic documentation. Austin, Texas: Ensoft Inc.
12. Fernández, J.A., 2007. Numerical simulation of earthquake ground motions in the upper Mississippi embayment. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, p. 365.
13. Green, R.A., Obermeier, S.F. and Olson, S.M., 2005. Engineering geologic and geotechnical analysis of paleoseismic shaking using liquefaction effects: field examples. Engineering Geology, 76, 263-293.
14. Jones, A.L., Kramer, S.L. and Arduino, P., 2002. Estimation of uncertainty in geotechnical properties for performancebased earthquake engineering. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report 2002/16.
15. Kwon, O. and Elnashai, A.S., 2008. Multi-platform simulation of highway over-crossing bridge with consideration of soil-structure interaction. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 134 (4), 651-660.
16. Kwon, O., Nakata, N., Elnashai, A.S. and Spencer, B., 2005. A framework for multi-site distributed simulation and application to complex structural systems. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9 (5), 741-753.
17. Mander, J.B., Kim, D.-K, Chen, S.S. and Premus, G.J., 1996. Response of steel bridge bearings to reversed cyclic loading. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Technical Report NCEER-96-0014.
18. Maroney, B.H., 1995. Large scale bridge abutment tests to determine stiffness and ultimate strength under seismic loading. Thesis (PhD). University of California, Davis.
19. Mazroi, A., Wang, L.L. and Murray, T.M., 1983. Effective coefficient of friction of steel bridge bearings. Transportation Research Record 903.
20. McKenna, F. and Fenves, G.L., 2001. The OpenSees command language manual, Version 1.2. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley.
21. Mirza, S.A. and MacGregor, J.G., 1979. Variability of mechanical properties of reinforcing bars. Journal of Structural Division, 105 (ST5), 921-937.
22. Mosalam, K.M., Ayala, G., White, R.N. and Roth, C., 1997. Seismic fragility of LRC frames with and without masonry infill walls. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1 (4), 693-720.
23. Nielson, B.G., 2005. Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones. Thesis (PhD). Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
24. Nielson, B.G. and DesRoches, R., 2007. Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36, 823-839.
25. Orsini, G., 1999. A model for buildings' vulnerability assessment using the parameterless scale of seismic intensity (PSI). Earthquake Spectra, 15 (3), 463-483.
26. Padgett, J.E. and DesRoches, R., 2007. Bridge functionality relationships for improved seismic risk assessment of transportation networks. Earthquake Spectra, 23 (1), 115-130.
27. Reinhorn, A.M., Barron-Corvera, R. and Ayala, A.G., 2001. Spectral evaluation of seismic fragility of structures. In: 8th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR). Newport Beach, CA, Paper no. 466.
28. Romero, S.M. and Rix, G.J., 2001. Ground motion amplification of soils in the upper Mississippi embayment. Georgia Institute of Technology, GIT-CEE/GEO-01-1.
29. Rossetto, T. and Elnashai, A.S., 2003. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Engineering Structures, 25 (10), 1241-1263.
30. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2006. Earthquake hazards program website. Available from: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/ [Accessed 31 August 2006].
31. Yang, Z., Lu, J. and Elgamal, A., 2005. OpenSees geotechnical simulation capabilities and user manual. University of California San Diego. Available from: http://cyclic.ucsd.edu/opensees