Developing a research agenda for ubiquitous computing in schools

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 371-386

  Zucker, Andrew ^a,b  

^a Natl Inst Drug Abuse/Dept Vet A   (United States)

^b EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5644288875     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/BYR8-CGFC-WVHV-T0TL     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Adelman, N., Donnelly, M. B., Dove, T., Tiffany-Morales, J., Wayne, A., & Author, A. (2002). The integrated studies of educational technology: Professional development and teachers' use of technology. Arlington, VA: SRI International.
2. Branigan, C. (2003, February 12). Florida union leader floats laptop plan to free up classroom space. eSchool News.
3. Burrill, G., Allison, J., Breaux, G., Kastberg, S., Leatham, K., & Sanchez, W. (2002). Handheld graphing technology in secondary mathematics: Research findings and implications for classroom practice. Dallas, TX: Texas Instruments.
4. Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3-12.
5. Kerr, K. A., Pane, J. F., & Barney, H. (2003). Quaker Valley Digital School District: Early effects and plans for future evaluation (Technical Report TR-107-EDU). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
6. Lemke, C., & Martin, C. (2003). One-to-one computing in Maine: A state profile. Los Angeles, CA: Metiri Group.
7. Metiri Group. (2002). Apple Computer/Henrico County individualized computing framework. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
8. Myers, D., & Dynarski, M. (2003). Random assignment in program evaluation and intervention research: Questions and answers: U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
9. Page, M. (2002). Technology-enriched classrooms: Effects on students of low socioeconomic status. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 389-409.
10. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2003). Learning for the 21st century: A report and mile guide for 21st century skills. Washington, DC: Author.
11. Penuel, W. R., Kim, D. Y., Michalchik, V., Lewis, S., Means, B., Murphy, R., Korbak, C., Whaley, A., & Allen, J. E. (2002). Using technology to enhance connections between home and school: A research synthesis. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
12. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education. (2002). 2000-01 Report of student performance North Carolina tests of computer skills. Raleigh: Author.
13. Robinson, H. (2003). Expecting and achieving excellence: W. L. Parks Middle School. Georgia Public Policy Foundation. Retrieved January 9, 2004, from the World Wide Web: http://www.gppf.org/pubs/commentaries/2003/parks_middle.htm
14. Rockman, S. (2003). Learning from laptops. Threshold, 1(1), 24-28.
15. Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. (2002, January 7-11). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change CSCL. Paper presented at the 2002 Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) conference, Boulder, CO.
16. Russell, M., Bebell, D. & Higgins, J. (2004). Laptop learning: A comparison of teaching and learning in classrooms with shared laptops and permanent 1:1 laptops. Chestnut Hill, MA: Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College.
17. Russell, M., & Higgins, J. (2003). Assessing effects of technology on learning: Limitations of today's standardized tests. Boston, MA: Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College.
18. Silvernail, D. L., & Harris, W. J. (2003). The Maine Learning Technology Initiative: Teacher, student, and school perspectives, mid-year evaluation report. Gorham, ME: Maine Education Policy Research Institute, University of Southern Maine.
19. Soloway, E., Norris, C., Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. (2001). Handheld devices are ready-at-hand. Communications of the ACM, 44(6), 15-20.
20. Trotter, A., & Borja, R. R. (2004, January 7). Researchers eye technology's effects on achievement. Education Week, p. 8.
21. U.S. Department of Education. (2003a). $15 million in grants awarded to help states study technology's impact on student achievement (press release) [press release]. Retrieved 12/10/2003, from the WWW: www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2003/11/11102003.html
22. U.S. Department of Education. (2003b). Enhancing Education Through Technology mandated evaluation: Evaluation of the effectiveness of educational technology interventions. Author. Retrieved 1/12/04 from: www.ed.gov/about/ offices/list/os/technology/impactupdate.pdf
23. U.S. Department of Education Policy and Program Studies Service. (2003). Federal funding for educational technology and how it is used in the classroom: A summary of findings from the Integrated Studies of Educational Technology. Washington, DC: Author.
24. Vahey, P., & Crawford, V. (2002). Palm Education Pioneers Program: Final evaluation report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.