Test-based grade retention: Does it stand up to professional standards for fair and appropriate test use?

Educational Researcher

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 110-119

  Penfield, Randall D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Retention; Testing

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951460124     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X10363007     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Abedi, J. (2002). Standardized achievement tests and English language learners: Psychometric issues. Educational Assessment, 8, 231-257.
2. Abidin, R. R., Gollady, W. M., & Howerton, A. L. (1971). Elementary school retention: An unjustifiable, discriminatory and noxious educational policy. Journal of School Psychology, 9, 410-417.
3. Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Dauber, S. L. (2003). On the success of failure: A reassessment of the effects of retention in the primary grades (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Allensworth, E. M. (2005). Dropout rates after high-stakes testing in elementary school: A study of the contradictory effects of Chicago's efforts to end social promotion. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 341-364.
5. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. Baker, E. L., Griffin, N. C., & Choi, K. (2008). The achievement gap in California: Context, status, and approaches for improvement. Retrieved September 3, 2008, from www.closingtheachievementgap.org/cs/ctag/view/resources
7. Bester v. Tuscaloosa City Board of Education, 722 F.2d 1514 (11th Cir. 1984).
8. Brooks-Gunn, J., Guo, G., & Furstenberg, F. F. (1993). Who drops out of and who continues beyond high school? A 20-year follow-up of Black urban youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3, 271-294.
9. Buckendahl, C. W., & Hunt, R. (2005). Whose rules? The relation between the "rules" and the "law" of testing. In R. P. Phelps (Ed.), Defending standardized testing (pp. 147-158). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Byrnes, D. A. (1989). Attitudes of students, parents, and educators toward repeating a grade. In L. A. Shepard & M. L. Smith (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 108-131). Philadelphia: Falmer.
11. Coffield, W. H., & Blommers, P. (1956). Effects of non-promotion on educational achievement in the elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 235-250.
12. Coleman, A. L. (1998). Excellence and equity in education: High standards for high-stakes tests. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law, 6, 81-113.
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Alternatives to grade retention. School Administrator, 55(7), 18-23.
14. Darling-Hammond, L. (2004). Inequality and the right to learn: Access to qualified teachers in California's public schools. Teacher's College Record, 106, 1936-1966.
15. Debra P. v. Turlington, 474 F. Supp. 244 (M.D. Fla. 1979); 564 F. Supp. 177 (M.D. Fla. 1983).
16. Dennebaum, J. M., & Kulberg, J. M. (1994). Kindergarten retention and transition classrooms: Their relationship to achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 31, 5-12.
17. Durling, J. P. (1984). Testing the tests: The due process implications of minimum competency testing. New York University Law Review, 59, 577-632.
18. Elam, S. M. (1990). The 22nd annual Gallup poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 41-54.
19. Erik V. v. Causby, 977 F. Supp. 384 (E.D. N.C. 1997).
20. Ferguson, P. C. (1991). Longitudinal outcome differences among promoted and transitional at-risk kindergarten students. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 139-146.
21. Florida Department of Education. (2008a). [Graphs]. Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://fcat.fldoe.org/mediapacket/2008/ pdf/mediaPacketGR3_AchievementLevels.pdf
22. Florida Department of Education. (2008b). Non-promotions in Florida's Schools, 2006-2007. Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://www.fldoe.org/eias/eiaspubs/nonpromotion
23. GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency, 87 F. Supp. 2d 667 (W.D. Tex. 2000).
24. Gottfredson, D. C., Fink, C. M., & Graham, N. (1994). Grade retention and problem behavior. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 761-784.
25. Grissom, J. B., & Shepard, L. A. (1989). Repeating and dropping out of school. In L. A. Shepard & M. L. Smith (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 34-63). Philadelphia: Falmer.
26. Hagborg, W. J., Masella, G., Palladino, P., & Shepardson, J. (1991). A follow-up study of high school students with a history of grade reten- tion. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 310-317.
27. Heubert, J. P. (1999). Nondiscriminatory use of high-stakes tests: Combining professional test-use standards with federal civil-rights enforcement. Educational Law Reporter, 133, 17-33.
28. Heubert, J. P. (2002/2003). First, do no harm. Educational Leadership, 60(4), 26-30.
29. Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30. Holmes, C. T. (1989). Grade level retention effects: A meta-analysis of research studies. In L. A. Shepard & M. L. Smith (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 16-33). Philadelphia: Falmer.
31. Holmes, C. T. (2006). Low test scores + high retention rates = more dropouts. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42(2), 56-58.
32. Holmes, C. T., & Matthews, K. M. (1984). The effects of nonpromo- tion on elementary and junior high school pupils: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 54, 225-236.
33. Hong, G., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2005). Effects of kindergarten reten- tion policy on children's cognitive growth in reading and mathemat- ics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 205-224.
34. House, E. R. (1989). Policy implications of retention. In L. A. Shepard & M. L. Smith (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on reten tion (pp. 202-213). Philadelphia: Falmer.
35. Jackson, G. B. (1975). The research evidence on the effects of grade retention. Review of Educational Research, 45, 613-635.
36. Janosz, M., LeBlanc, M., Boulerice, B., & Tremblay, R. E. (1997). Disentangling the weight of school dropout predictors: A test on two longitudinal samples. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 733-762.
37. Jimerson, S. R. (1999). On the failure of failure: Examining the associa- tion between early grade retention and education and employment outcomes during late adolescence. Journal of School Psychology, 37(3), 243-272.
38. Jimerson, S. R. (2001). Meta-analysis of grade retention research: Implications for practice in the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 30, 420-437.
39. Jimerson, S. R., Anderson, G. E., & Whipple, A. D. (2002). Winning the battle and losing the war: Examining the relation between grade retention and dropping out of high school. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 441-457.
40. Jimerson, S. R., Carlson, E., Rotert, M., Egeland, B., & Sroufe, L. A. (1997). A prospective, longitudinal study of the correlates and conse- quences of early grade retention. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 3-25.
41. Jimerson, S. R., & Ferguson, P. (2007). A longitudinal study of grade retention: Academic and behavioral outcomes of retained students through adolescence. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 314-339.
42. Johnson, E. R., Merrell, K. W., & Stover, L. (1990). The effects of early grade retention on the academic achievement of fourth-grade students. Psychology in the Schools, 27, 333-338.
43. Joint Committee on Testing Practices. (2004). Code of fair testing practices in education. Washington, DC: Author.
44. misctextLarry P. v. Riles, 495 F. Supp. 926, (N.D. Cal. 1979).; aff'd, 793 F.2d 969 (9th Cir. 1984)/misctext.
45. Larsen, D. E., & Akmal, T. T. (2007). Making decisions in the dark: Disconnects between retention research and middle-level practice. NASSP Bulletin, 91, 33-56.
46. Lee, J. (2002). Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 3-12.
47. Levin, H. M. (2009). The economic payoff to investing in educational justice. Educational Researcher, 38, 5-20.
48. Lloyd, D. N. (1978). Prediction of school failure from third-grade data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 1193-1200.
49. Luykx, A., Lee, O., Mahotiere, M., Lester, B., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2007). Cultural and home language influences on children's responses to science assessments. Teachers College Record, 109, 897-926.
50. Mantzicopoulos, P., & Morrison, D. (1992). Kindergarten retention: Academic and behavioral outcomes through the end of second grade. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 182-198.
51. McCombs-Thomas, A., Armistead, L., Kempton, T., Lynch, S., Forehand, R., Nousiainen, S., Neighbors, B., & Tannenbaum, L. (1992). Early retention: Are there long-term beneficial effects? Psychology in the Schools, 29, 342-347.
52. McCoy, A. R., & Reynolds, A. J. (1999). Grade retention and school performance: An extended investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 273-298.
53. Meisels, S. J., & Liaw, F.-R. (1993). Failure in grade: Do retained students catch up? Journal of Educational Research, 87, 69-77.
54. Mitchell, D. E., & Encarnation, D. J. (1984). Alternative state policy mechanisms for influencing school performance. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 4-11.
55. Murphy, J. (1990). The educational reform movement of the 1980s: A com-prehensive analysis. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational reform movement of the 1980s: Perspectives and cases (pp. 3-55). Berkley, CA: McCutchan.
56. Nason, R. B. (1991). Retaining children: Is it the right decision? Childhood Education, 67, 300-304.
57. National Association of School Psychologists. (2003). Position statement on student grade retention and social promotion. Bethesda, MD: Author.
58. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative of educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
59. Niklason, L. B. (1984). Nonpromotion: A pseudoscientific solution. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 485-499.
60. Niklason, L. B. (1987). Do certain groups of children profit from grade retention? Psychology in the Schools, 24, 339-345.
61. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110.
62. O'Neill, P. T. (2003). High stakes testing law and litigation. Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, 623-662.
63. Peters, B. G. (2007). American public policy: Promise and performance (7th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
64. Peterson, P. L. (1989). Alternatives to student retention: New images of the learner, the teacher, and classroom learning. In L. A. Shepard & M. L. Smith (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 174-201). Philadelphia: Falmer.
65. Peterson, S. E., DeGracie, J. S., & Ayabe, C. R. (1987). A longitudinal study of the effects of retention/promotion on academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 107-118.
66. Phelps, L., Dowdell, N., Rizzo, F. G., Ehrlich, P., & Wilczenski, F. (1992). Five to ten years after placement: The long-term efficacy of retention and pre-grade transition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 10, 116-123.
67. Phillips, S. E. (2000). GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency: Psychometric evidence. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 343-385.
68. Phillips, S. E., & Camara, W. J. (2006). Legal and ethical issues. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational Measurement (4th ed.; pp. 733-755). Westport, CT: Praeger.
69. Pierson, L. H., & Connell, J. P. (1992). Effect of grade retention on self- system processes, school engagement, and academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 300-307.
70. Reynolds, A. J. (1992). Grade retention and school adjustment: An explan- atory analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 101-121.
71. Roderick, M. (1994). Grade retention and school dropout: Investigating the association. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 729-759.
72. Roderick, M., Jacob, B., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). The impact of high- stakes testing in Chicago on student achievement in promotional gate grades. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 333-357.
73. Roderick, M., & Nagaoka, J. (2005). Retention under Chicago's high- stakes testing program: Helpful, harmful, or harmless? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 309-340.
74. Rothstein, R. (1998). Where is Lake Wobegon, anyway? Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 195-198.
75. Rumberger, R. W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of students and schools. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 583-625.
76. Rumberger, R. W., & Gandara, P. (2004). Seeking equity in the educa- tion of California's English learners. Teachers College Record, 106, 2032-2056.
77. Rust, J. O., & Wallace, K. A. (1993). Effects of grade level retention for four years. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 20, 162-166.
78. Sandlin v. Johnson, 643 F.2d 1027 (4th Cir. 1981).
79. Shepard, L. A., & Smith, M. L. (1988). Escalating academic demand in kindergarten: Counterproductive policies. Elementary School Journal, 89(2), 135-145.
80. Shepard, L. A., & Smith, M. L. (1989). Introduction and overview. In L. A. Shepard & M. L. Smith (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 1-15). Philadelphia: Falmer.
81. Shepard, L. A., & Smith, M. L. (1990). Synthesis of research on grade retention. Educational Leadership, 47(8), 84-88.
82. Sidgwick, H. (1907). The methods of ethics (7th ed.). London: MacMillan.
83. Smith, M. L. (1989). Teachers' beliefs about retention. In L. A. Shepard & M. L. Smith (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 132-150). Philadelphia: Falmer.
84. Smith, M. L., & Shepard, L. A. (1988). Kindergarten readiness and retention: A qualitative study of teachers' beliefs and practices. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 307-333.
85. Solano-Flores, G., & Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 553-573.
86. Solano-Flores, G., & Trumbull, E. (2003). Examining language in context: The need for new research and practice paradigms in the testing of English-language learners. Educational Researcher, 32(2), 3-13.
87. Stroup, A. L., & Robins, L. N. (1972). Elementary school predictors of high school dropout among Black males. Sociology of Education, 45, 212-222.
88. Tanner, C. K., & Combs, F. E. (1993). Student retention policy: The gap between research and practice. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 8, 69-77.
89. Tanner, C. K., & Galis, S. A. (1997). Student retention: Why is there a gap between the majority of research findings and school practice? Psychology in the Schools, 34, 107-114.
90. Texas Education Agency. (2007). 2007 Comprehensive annual report on Texas public schools (Document No. GE08 601 04). Austin, TX: Author.
91. Tomchin, E. M., & Impara, J. C. (1992). Unraveling teachers' beliefs about grade retention. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 199-223.
92. Xia, C., & Glennie, E. (2005). Cost-benefit analysis of grade retention. Durham, NC: Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University.
93. Zwick, R. (2002). Fair game? The use of standardized admissions tests in higher education. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.