Seeking equity in the education of California's english learners

Teachers College Record

Volumn 106, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 2032-2056

  Rumberger, Russell W ^a,c   Gándara, Patricia ^b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UC Ling Minority Research Institute   (United States)

^d Plcy Anal for California Education   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 8644267468     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00426.x     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2. Anstrom, K. (1997). Academic achievement for secondary language minority students: Standards, measures, and promising practices. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
3. Artiles, A. J., Rueda, R., Salazar, J.J., & Higareda, I. (2002). English language learner representation in special education: in California Urban School Districts (pp. 117-136). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
4. Barr, R., & Dreeben, R. (1983). How schools work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (1998). Standards of quality and effectiveness for multiple and single subject credentials: Handbook for teacher educators and accreditation team members. Sacramento, CA: Author.
6. California Department of Education. (2003). Dataquest. Retrieved April 9, 2003, from http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/
7. California Department of Education. (2002). Easton releases Spring 2002 California High School Exit Exam Results. Retrieved January 23, 2003, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/news/releases2002/rel30.asp
8. California Department of Education. (1999). Proposition 227 survey: Interim report. Sacramento, CA: Author.
9. California Education Code Chapter, Sections 60850-60859. High School Exit Examination.
10. California State University, Office of the Chancellor. (2001). First systemwide evaluation of teacher education programs in the California State University: Summary report. Long Beach, CA: Author.
11. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.
12. Cooper, H., Nye, B., Charlton, K., Lindsay, J. J., & Greathouse, S. (1996). The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: A narrative and meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 66, 227-268.
13. Cornell, C. (1995). Reducing failure of LEP students in the mainstream classroom and why it is important. The Journal of Education Issues of Language Minority Students, 15.
14. Crawford v. Honig, No. C-89-0014(N.D.Cal.).RFP
15. Darling-Hammond, L. (2002). Access to quality teaching: An analysis of inequality in California's public schools. Expert report prepared for Williams v. State of California. Retrieved March 8, 2003, from http://www.mofo.com/ decentschools/expert_reports/darling-hammond_report.pdf
16. Diana v. California Board of Education, No. C-70-37. (N.D. Calif. 1970). Diana v. California Board of Education, Complaint for Injunction and Declaratory Relief (Civil Rights), 1973.
17. Epstein, J. L., & Karweitt, N. (Eds.). (1983). Friends in school: Patterns of selection and influence in secondary schools. New York: Academic Press.
18. Fleishman, H. L., & Hopstock, P. J. (1993). Descriptive study of services to limited English proficient students. Arlington, VA: Development Associates.
19. Gamoran, A. (1992). The variable effects of high school tracking. American Sociological Review, 57, 812-828.
20. Gándara, P., Maxwell-Jolly, J., García, E., Asato, J., Gutiérrez, K., Stritikus, T., & Curry, J. (2000). The initial impact of Proposition 227 on the instruction of English Learners. Davis, CA: UC Linguistic Minority Research Center Education Policy Center.
21. Gándara, P., & Rumberger, R. W. (2003). The inequitable treatment of English learners in California's public schools. Revised report prepared for the lawsuit, Williams v. State of California. Retrieved April 25, 2003, from http://idea.gseis.ucla.edu/publications/williams
22. Gándara, P., Rumberger, R. W., Maxwell-Jolly, J., & Callahan, R. (2003). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11. Retrieved November 19, 2003, from: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n36/
23. Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Gottlieb, J., Alter, M., Gottlieb, B. W., & Wishner, J. (1994). Special education in urban America: It's not justifiable for many. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 453-465.
25. Guy, B., Hasazi, S. B., & Johnson, D. R. (1999). Transition from school to adult life. In M. J. Coutinho & A. C. Repp (Eds.), Inclusion: The integration of students with disabilities. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
26. Hakuta, K. (2002). English language learner access to basic educational necessities in California: An analysis of inequities. Retrieved November 19, 2003, from http://www.mofo.com/decentschools/expert_reports/hakuta_report.pdf
27. Hakuta, K., Butler, Y. G., & Witt, D. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? (Policy Report 2000-1). Santa Barbara: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
28. Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., Markman, J. M., & Rivkin, S. G. (2001). Does peer ability affect student achievement? (NBER Working Paper No. w8502). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
29. Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivkin, S. G. (2001). Why public schools lose teachers (Working paper 8599). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
30. Harris, L. (2002). A survey of the status of equality in public education in California: A survey of a cross-section of public school teachers. San Francisco: Public Advocates, Inc.
31. Haycock, K. (1998). Good teaching matters: How well-qualified teachers can close the gap. Thinking, K-16, 3, 1-17.
32. Hayes, K., & Salazar, J. J. (2001). Evaluation of the structured English Immersion Program. Final Report: Year 1. Program Evaluation and Research Branch, Los Angeles Unified School District. Retrieved July 26, 2004, from http://www.lausd.k12.ca.us/lausd/offices/perb/files/reports/RPT%20SEI%20Y1.pdf
33. Hayes, K., Salazar, J. J., & Vuckovic, G. (2002). Evaluation of the Structured English Immersion Program. Final Report: Year 2. Program Evaluation and Research Branch, Los Angeles Unified School District. Retrieved July 26, 2004, from http://www.lausd.k12.ca.us/lausd/offices/perb/files/reports/ RPT%20SEI%20Y2.pdf
34. Heller, K. A., Holtzman, W. H., & Messick, S. (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35. Hornberger, N. H. (1990). Creating successful learning contexts for bilingual literacy. Teachers College Record, 99, 212-229.
36. Hoxby, C. (2000). Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation (NBER Working Paper No. w7867). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
37. Hurd, C. (2004). English proficiency limited: The interpersonal politics of learning English among Mexican-Descent students. In G. G. Gibson, P. P. Gándara, & J. P. Koyama (Eds.), School connections: Peers, achievement, and U.S. Mexican youth (pp. 63-86). New York: Teachers College Press.
38. Loeb, S., & Page, M. E. (2000). Examining the link between teacher wages and student outcomes: The importance of alternative labor market opportunities and non-pecuniary variation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 393-408.
39. Lucas, T., Henze, R., & Donato, R. (1990). Promoting the success of Latino language minority students: An exploratory study of six high schools. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 315-340.
40. Mounts, N. S., & Steinberg, L. (1995). An ecological analysis of peer influence on adolescent grade point average and drug use. Developmental Psychology, 31, 915-922.
41. National Research Council, Committee on Appropriate Test Use. (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43. Olsen, L. (1997). Made in America: Immigrant students in our public schools. New York: New Press.
44. Ovando, C., & Collier, V. (1998). Bilingual and ESL classrooms: Teaching in multicultural contexts (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
45. Parrish, T. B., Linquanti, R., Merickel, A., Quick, H. E., Laird, J., & Esra, P. (2001). Effects of the Implementation of Proposition 227 on the Education of English Learners, K-12. Year 1 Report. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
46. Parrish, T. B., Linquanti, R., Merickel, A., Quick, H. E., Laird, J., & Esra, P. (2002). Effects of the Implementation of Proposition 227 on the Education of English Learners, K-12. Year 2 Report. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
47. Ruiz-de-Velasco, J., & Fix, M. (2000). Overlooked and underserved: Immigrant students in U.S. secondary schools. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
48. Rumberger, R. W., & Arellano, B. (2003). Understanding and addressing the Latino achievement gap in California. Berkeley, CA: UC Latino Policy Institute.
49. Rumberger, R. W., & Gándara, P. (2000). The schooling of English Learners. In E. Burr, G. Hayward, & M. Kirst (Eds.), Crucial issues in California education (pp. 23-44). Berkeley: Policy Analysis for California Education.
50. Sanders, W. L., & Horn, P. (1995). The Tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS): Mixed model methodology in educational assessment. In D. Schinkfield (Ed.), Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice (pp. 337-350). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
51. Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
52. Scarcella, R., & Rumberger, R. W. (2000). Academic English key to long-term success in school. UC Linguistic Minority Research Institute Newsletter, 9, 1-2.
53. Skirtic, T. M. (1991). The special education paradox: Equity as a way to excellence. Harvard Educational Review, 61, 148-206.
54. Stecher, B. M., & Bohrnstedt, G. W. (Eds.). (2002). Class size reduction in California: Findings from 1999-00 and 2000-01. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
55. Suárez-Orozco, M., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (1996). Trans-formations: Migration, family life, and achievement motivation among Latino adolescents. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
56. Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students' long-term academic achievement. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz, Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence.
57. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). Dropout rates in the United States: 2000. Washington, DC: Author.
58. University of California Office of the President. (UCOP). (2002). Report to the legislature on California Professional Development Institutes. Oakland, CA: Author.
59. Wise, L. L., Sipes, D. E., DeMeyer Harris, C., George, C. E., Ford, J. P., & Sun, S. (2002). Independent evaluation of the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE): Analysis of the 2001 administration. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.
60. Wong-Fillmore, L. (1991). Second-language learning in children: A model of language learning in social context. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 49-69). New York: Cambridge University Press.