Social interactions in P2P lending

Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis, SNA-KDD '09

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Herrero Lopez, Sergio ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clustering; Gaussian mixture; Social networks

Indexed keywords

APRIORI; BANGLADESH; BANKING INSTITUTIONS; FINANCIAL INNOVATION; GAUSSIAN MIXTURES; INTERNET COMMUNITIES; MODEL-BASED CLUSTERING; P2P (PEER TO PEER); QUALIFICATION TEST; RISK EVALUATION; SOCIAL GROUPS; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; SOCIAL NETWORKS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; INTERNET; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 77951450235     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1731011.1731014     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. S. Knack, P. Keefer. Does Social Capital Have An Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997.
2. M. Hulme., C. Wright. Internet Based Social Lending: Past, Present and Future. Social Futures Observatory. October 2006.
3. S. Freedman, G.Z. Jin. Do Social Networks Solve Information Problems for Peer-to-Peer Lending? Evidence from Prosper. Com - papers.ssrn.com.
4. S. Berger, F. Gleisner. Emergence of Financial Intermediaries on Electronic Markets: The Case of Online P2P Lending - papers.ssrn.com
5. M. Herzenstein, R. Andrews, U .Dholakia, E. Lyandres. The Democratization of Personal Consumer Loans? Determinants of Success in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending Communities - papers.ssrn.com
6. J.R. Sydnor, D.G. Pope. What's in a Picture? Evidence of Discrimination from Prosper. com - papers.ssrn.com
7. J.Ryan, K.Reuk, C.Wang, "To Fund Or Not To Fund: Determinants Of Loan Fundability in the Prosper.com Marketplace.", Stanford Graduate School of Business.
8. Crandall, D., Cosley, D., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., and Suri, S. 2008. Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. In Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, August 24-27, 2008). KDD '08. ACM, New York, NY, 160-168.
9. N. E. Friedkin. A Structural Theory of Social Influence. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
10. P. Lazarsfeld and R. Merton. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Bergen, T. Abel, and C. Page, editors, Freedom and Control in Modern Society. Van Nostrand, 1954.
11. M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, and J. Cook. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 2001.
12. Backstrom, L., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., and Lan, X. 2006. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Philadelphia, PA, USA, August 20-23, 2006). KDD '06. ACM, New York, NY, 44-54.
13. Anagnostopoulos, A., Kumar, R., and Mahdian, M. 2008. Influence and correlation in social networks. In Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, August 24-27, 2008). KDD '08. ACM, New York, NY, 7-15
14. Figueiredo, M. A. and Jain, A. K. 2002. Unsupervised Learning of Finite Mixture Models. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24, 3 (Mar. 2002), 381-396.
15. Dempster.A, Laird.N, and Rubin D. Maximum Likelihood Estimation from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm. J.Royal Statistical Soc. B, vol.39, pp. 1-38, 1977.
16. McLachlan G, Krishnan T. The EM Algorithm and Extensions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997.
17. McLachlan G, Peel D. Finite Mixture Models. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
18. Rangarajan A. "Self Annealing: Unifying Deterministic Annealing and Relaxation Labeling," Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, M.Pellilo and E. Hancock, eds., pp. 229-244, Springer Verlag, 1997.
19. Amaral L.A.N., Scala A., Barthelemy M., Stanley H.E., Classes of small-world networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. PNAS, October 10, 2000.