Barriers to empowerment: Fighting eviction for conservation in a southern Brazilian protected area

Local Environment

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 217-232

  Almudi, Tiago ^a   Berkes, Fikret ^b  

^a INSTITUTO DE PESQUISA AMBIENTAL DA AMAZÔNIA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Environmental justice; Multi level governance; Partnerships; Political ecology; Protected areas

Indexed keywords

EMPOWERMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; NATURE CONSERVATION; PARTNERSHIP APPROACH; PROTECTED AREA;

BRAZIL;

EID: 77951262707     PISSN: 13549839     EISSN: 14696711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13549830903575570     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adams, W.M. and Hutton, J., 2007. People, parks and poverty: political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conservation and Society, 5 (2), 147-183.
2. Adger, W.N., Brown, K., and Tompkins, E.L., 2004. Why do resource management make links to stakeholders at other scales? Tyndall Centre Working Paper 65.
3. Adger, W.N., Brown, K., and Tompkins, E.L., 2005. The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management. Ecology and Society, 10 (2), 9.
4. Algotsson, E., 2006. Wildlife conservation through people-centred approaches to natural resource management programmes and the control of wildlife exploitation. Local Environment, 11 (1), 79-93.
5. Almudi, T., 2008. Opportunities and problems for participatory management in the Peixe Lagoon National Park, southern Brazil, Thesis (masters). University of Manitoba, Winnipeg. Available from: http://www.umanitoba.ca/institutes/natural_resources/canadaresearchchair/thesis/Almudi.Masters%20Thesis.Oct%2008.pdf [Accessed 16 December 2009].
6. Amend, S. and Amend, T., 1992. Human occupation in the national parks of South America: a fundamental problem. Parks, 3 (1), 4-8.
7. Berkes, F., 2004. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18 (3), 621-630.
8. Berkes, F., 2007. Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104 (39), 15188-15193.
9. Berkes, F., 2009. Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal ofEnvironmental Management, 90 (5), 1692-1702.
10. Bernard, H.R., 1988. Research methods in cultural anthropology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Brazil, 2000. SNUC - Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservacao. Lei N. 9.985 de 18 de Julho de 2000. Brasilia, Brazil: Governo do Brasil, Presidencia da Republica.
12. Brockington, D., 2004. Community conservation, inequality and injustice: myths of power in protected area management. Conservation and Society, 2 (2), 411-432.
13. Brockington, D. and Igoe, J., 2006. Eviction for conservation: a global overview. Conservation and Society, 4 (3), 424-470.
14. Cash, D.W., et al., 2006. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11 (2), 8.
15. Castello, L., et al., 2009. Lessons from integrating fishers of Arapaima in small-scale fisheries management at the Mamiraua Reserve, Amazon. Environmental Management, 43 (2), 197-209.
16. Charity, S. and Masterson, D., 1999. Mamiraua Sustainable Development Reserve, Brazil. In: S. Solton and N. Dudley, eds. Partnerships for protection. New strategies for planning and management for protected areas. London, UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd, 109-117.
17. Chuenpagdee, R. and Jentoft, S., 2007. Step zero for fisheries co-management: what precedes implementation. Marine Policy, 31 (6), 657-668.
18. CONAB, 2004. Programa de Aquisic&o de Alimentos - Sumario Executivo [online]. Available from: http://www.conab.gov.br/conabweb/agriculturaFamiliar/arquivos/paa_sumario_2004.pdf [Accessed 22 January 2008].
19. Creswell, J.W., 1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Creswell, J.W., 2003. Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Diegues, A.C., ed., 2000. Etnoconservacao: novos rumos para a protecao da natureza nos tropicos. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Hucitec.
22. Diegues, A.C., 2008 (org.). Marine protected areas and artisanal fisheries in Brazil. 54p, Samudra monograph, International Collective in Support of Fishworkers.
23. Eckerberg, K. and Joas, M., 2004. Multi-level environmental governance: a concept under stress? Local Environment, 9 (5), 405-412.
24. Kalikoski, D.C. and Satterfield, T., 2004. On crafting a fisheries co-management arrangement in the estuary of Patos Lagoon (Brazil): opportunities and challenges faced through implementation. Marine Policy, 28 (6), 503-522.
25. Kalikoski, D.C., Vasconcellos, M., and Lavkulich, L., 2002. Fitting institutions to ecosystems: the case of artisanal fisheries management in the estuary of Patos Lagoon. Marine Policy, 26 (3), 179-196.
26. Kalikoski, D.C., Almudi, T., and Seixas, C.S., 2006. O estado da arte da gestao compartilhada e gestao comunitaria da pesca no Brasil. Revista Jirau, 15 (3), 14-16.
27. Knak, R.B., ed., 2004. The Peixe Lagoon National Park Management Plan. Brasilia (DF), Brasil: Portaria 012/2004.
28. Loebmann, D. and Vieira, J.P., 2006. O impacto da pesca do camarao-rosa Farfantepenaeus paulensis (Perez-Farfante) (Decapoda, Penaeidae) nas assembleias de peixes e siris do Parque Nacional da Lagoa do Peixe, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 23 (4), 1016-1028.
29. Olsson, P., Folke, C., and Berkes, F., 2004. Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management, 34 (1), 75-90.
30. Pinto da Silva, P., 2004. From common property to co-management: lessons from Brazil's first maritime extractive reserve. Marine Policy, 28 (5), 419-428.
31. Queiroz, H.L., 2005. A Reserva de Desenvolvimento Sustentavel de Mamiraua. Estudos Avancados, 19 (54), 183-203.
32. Resende, S.L., 1988. No-breeding strategies of migratory birds of Lagoa do Peixe, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Thesis (masters). Cornell University.
33. Resende, S.L. and Leeuwenberg, F., 1987. Ecological studies of Lagoa do Peixe. Unpublished Technical Report of Project Lagoa do Peixe to World Wildlife Fund/US. Washington, DC. 52p.
34. Ruiz-Perez, M., et al., 2005. Conservation and development in Amazonian Extractive Reserves: the case of Alto Jurua. Ambio, 34 (3), 218-223.
35. Saint-Hilaire, A.D., 1987. Viagem ao Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Martins Livreiro.
36. Seixas, C.S. and Davy, B., 2008. Self-organization in integrated conservation and development initiatives. International Journal of the Commons, 2 (1), 99-125.
37. Tagliani, P.R.A., 1995. Estrategia de planificacao ambientalpara o sistema ecoloigico da Restinga da Lagoa dos Patos-Planicie Costeira do Rio Grande do Sul. Thesis (PhD). Universidade de Sao Carlos.
38. Timmer, V. and Juma, C., 2005. Biodiversity conservation and poverty reduction come together in the tropics: lessons from the Equator Initiative. Environment, 47 (4), 24-47.
39. Young, O., 2002. The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Young, O.R., King, L.A., and Schroeder, H., eds., 2008. Institutions and environmental change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Walker, B., et al., 2009. Looming global-scale failures and missing institutions. Science, 325 (5946), 1345-1346.
42. West, P., Igoe, J., and Brockington, D., 2006. Parks and peoples: the social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35 (1), 251-277.