Field of view effects on pilot performance in flight

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 197-219

  Covelli, Javier M ^a   Rolland, Jannick P ^b   Proctor, Michael ^c   Kincaid, J Peter ^d   Hancock, P A ^d  

^a NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^c University of Central Florida   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951247937     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508411003617888     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ames, B. (2005). Streamlined databases drive military simulation. Military & Aerospace Electronics, 16(11).
2. Arrington, K. F., & Geri, G. A. (2000). Conjugate-optical retroreflector display system: Optical principles and perceptual issues. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 8(2), 123-128.
3. Arthur, K. (2000). Effects of field of view on performance with head-mounted displays. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
4. Bristow Academy. (2007). Tuition and fees. Retrieved November 20, 2007, from http://www.heli.com/prospective-student/2-tuition-and-fees-FAA.php#5
5. Cakmakci, O., & Rolland, J. (2006). Head-worn displays: A review. IEEE/OSA Journal of Display Technology, 2, 199-216.
6. Eastern Caribbean Civil Aviation Authority. (2005). Line oriented flight training (Operations Advisory Circular OAC-015, rev 1 dtd 11/05/05). St. Johns, Antigua: Author.
7. Endsley, M. R. (2000). Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: A critical review. In M. R. Endsley & D. J. Garland (Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp. 10-25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Flexman, R. P., & Stark, E. A. (1987). Training simulators. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors (pp. 1012-1037). New York: Wiley.
9. Gallimore, J. J., Brannon, N. G., & Patterson, F. R. (1998). The effects of field-of-view on pilot head movement during low level flight. In D. Woods&E. Roth (Eds.), Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd annual meeting (pp. 6-10). Chicago, IL: HFES.
10. Guest, M., & Rolland, J. P. (1999). Search strategies when masses are missed in mammography (Tech. Rep. TR99-007). Orlando: University of Central Florida.
11. Keller, M., Schnell, T., Lemos, K., Glaab, L., & Parrish, R. (2003, October). Pilot performance as a function of display resolution and field of view in simulated flight using synthetic vision systems. Paper presented at the 22nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
12. Lowry, R. (2007). Orthogonal Latin Square designs with n = j2. Retrieved August 3, 2006, from http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/lsqtext.html
13. Manor, B. R., & Gordon, E. (2003). Defining the temporal threshold for ocular fixation in free-viewing visuocognitive tasks. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 128(102), 85-93.
14. Pausch, R., Crea, T., & Conway, M. (1992).Aliterature survey for virtual environments: Military flight simulator visual systems and simulator sickness. Presence, 1, 344-363.
15. Poole, A., Ball, L. J., & Phillips, P. (2004). In search of salience: A response time and eye movement analysis of bookmark recognition. In S. Fincher, P. Markopolous, D. Moore, & R. Ruddle (Eds.), People and computers XVIII-Design for life: Proceedings of HCI 2004 (pp. 363-378). London: Springer-Verlag.
16. Poulton, E. C. (1973). Unwanted range effects from using within-subject experimental designs. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 113-121.
17. Proctor, M. D., Panko, M., & Donovan, S. J. (2004). Considerations for training team situation awareness and task performance through PC-gamer simulated multiship helicopter operations. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14, 191-205.
18. Richman, J. B., Stanfield, J., & Dyre, B. P. (1998). Small fields of view interfere with perception of heading during active control but not passive viewing. In D. Woods&E. Roth (Eds.), Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd annual meeting (pp. 1545-1549). Chicago, IL: HFES.
19. Rodriguez, A., Foglia, M., & Rolland, J. P. (2003). Embedded training display technology for the Army's future combat vehicles. In G. A. Parmentola (Ed.), Proceedings of the Image Conference Society (pp. 228-233). London, NJ: World Scientific.
20. Rolland, J. P., & Hua, H. (2005). Head-mounted displays. In R. B. Johnson & R. G. Driggers (Eds.), Encyclopedia of optical engineering (pp. 1-13). New York: Marcel Dekker.
21. Sisodia, A., Bayer, M., Townley-Smith, P., Nash, B., Little, J., Cassarly, W., et al. (2007). Advanced helmet mounted display (AHMD), head and helmet mounted displays: Design and applications. Proceedings of the SPIE, 6557, 65570N-1.
22. Smith, K., & Hancock, P. A. (1995). Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness. Human Factors, 37, 137-148.
23. Stewart, J. E., Dohme, J. A., & Nullmeyer, R. T. (2002). U.S. Army initial entry rotary-wing transfer of training research. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 12, 359-375.
24. Venturino, M., & Wells, M. J. (1990). Head movements as a function of field-of-view size on a helmet-mounted display. In D. Woods & E. Roth (Eds.), Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th annual meeting (pp. 1572-1576). Chicago, IL: HFES.
25. Wells, M. J., & Venturino, M. (1989). The effect of increasing task complexity on the field-of-view requirements for a visually coupled system. In D. Woods&E. Roth (Eds.), Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd annual meeting (pp. 91-95). Chicago, IL: HFES.
26. Wickens, C. D., Xu, X., Hellenberg, J. R., Carbonari, R., & Marsh, R. (2000). The allocation of visual attention for aircraft traffic monitoring and avoidance: Baseline measures and implications for freeflight (Tech. Rep. No. ARL-00-2/FAA-00-2) Savoy: University of Illinois, Aviation Research Lab.
27. Winterbottom, M., Patterson, R., & Pierce, B. P. (2006, April). Visual suppression of monocularly presented symbology against a fused background in simulation and training environment. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Photo-Electronic Instrumentation Engineering, Defense and Security Symposium, Orlando, FL.