Considerations for training team situation awareness and task performance through PC-gamer simulated multiship helicopter operations

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 191-205

  Proctor, Michael D ^a   Panko, Michael ^b   Donovan, Sharlene J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b U S ARMY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542588574     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327108ijap1402_5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baker, D. P., & Salas, E. (1992). Principles for measuring teamwork. Human Factors, 34, 469-475.
2. Bowers, C. A., Braun, C., & Klein, P. B. (1994). Communication and team situation awareness. In R. D. Gibson, D. J. Garland, & J. M. Koonce (Eds.), Situation awareness in complex systems (pp. 306-311). Daytona Beach, FL: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press.
3. Department of the Army. (1996). TC 1-212: Aircrew training manual/utility helicopter UH-60/EH-60. Washington, DC: Author.
4. Department of the Army, (in press). TC 1-237: Aircrew training manual/utility helicopter, UH-60. Washington, DC: Author.
5. Department of the Navy. (1999, July-August). Student revs up flight simulator. Naval Aviation News, 5-6. Washington, DC: Author.
6. Endsley, M. R. (1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd annual meeting (pp. 97-101). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
7. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Situation awareness in dynamic human decision making: Theory. In J. M. Koonce (Ed.), Proceedings of the Center for Applied Human Factors in Aviation (CAHFA; pp. 27-58). Daytona Beach, FL: University of Central Florida.
8. Fowlkes, J. E., Dwyer, D. J., Oser, R. L., & Salas, E. (1998). Event-based approach to training (EBAT). The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 209-221.
9. Fowlkes, J. E., Lane, N. E., Salas, E., Franz, T., & Oser, R. L. (1994). Improving the measurement of team performance: The TARGETS methodology. Military Psychology, 4, 63-74.
10. Härtel, C., Smith, K. A., & Prince, C. (1991). Defining aircrew coordination: Searching mishaps for meaning. Paper given at the 6th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH.
11. Kelly, L. L. (1970). The pilot maker. New York: Grosset & Dunlap.
12. Mosier, K. L., & Chidester, T. R. (1991). Situation assessment and situation awareness in a team setting. In A. Marshal (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. Paris: International Ergonomics Association.
13. Mufiiz, E., Stout, R. J., & Salas, E. (1996). Communication as an indicator of team situation awareness. Paper given at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Norfolk, VA.
14. Orasanu, J., & Salas, E. (1993). Team decision making in complex environments. In G. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsamnok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 327-345). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15. Oser, R. L., Dwyer, D. J., & Fowlkes, J. E. (1995). Team performance in multi-service distributed interactive simulation exercises: Initial results [CD-ROM]. In Proceedings of the 17th Interservice/Industry Training Systems and Education conference (pp. 163-171). Arlington, VA: American Defense Preparedness Association.
16. Palmer, E. (1990). Situation awareness in the advanced commercial aircraft cockpit. In M. E. Wiklund (Ed.), Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th annual meeting (p. 21). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
17. Pew, R. A. (1994). An introduction to the concept of situation awareness. In J. M. Koonce (Ed.), Proceedings of the Center for Applied Human Factors in Aviation (CAHFA; pp. 17-23). Daytona Beach, FL: University of Central Florida.
18. Prince, C., & Salas, E. (1991). The utility of low fidelity simulation for training aircrew coordination skills. Paper given at the International Training Equipment Conference, Masstricht, The Netherlands.
19. Proctor, M., & Lipinski, M. J. (2000). Technical performance measures and distributed-simulation training systems. Acquisition Review Quarterly, 7, 19-32.
20. Salas, E., Bowers, C. A., & Rhodenizer, L. (1998). It is not how much you have but how you use it: Toward a rational use of simulation to support aviation training. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 197-208.
21. Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, D. P., & Shrestha, L. (1995). Situation awareness in team performance: Implications for measurement and training. Human Factors, 37, 123-136.
22. Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3-29). Norwoord, NJ: Ablex.
23. Stout, R. J., Salas, E., & Carson, R. (1994). Individual task proficiency and team process: What's important for team functioning. Military Psychology, 6, 177-192.
24. Taylor, H. L., Lintern, G., Hulin, C. L., Talleur, D. A., Emanuel, T. W., & Phillips, S. I. (1999). Transfer of training effectiveness of a personal computer aviation training device. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9, 319-335.