Is longer-term psychodynamic psychotherapy more effective than shorter-term therapies? Review and critique of the evidence

Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 208-216

  Bhar, Sunil S ^a   Thombs, Brett D ^b   Pignotti, Monica ^c   Bassel, Marielle ^b   Jewett, Lisa ^b   Coyne, James C ^d   Beck, Aaron T ^d  

^a SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Effectiveness; Efficacy; Long term therapy; Meta analysis; Psychotherapy; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; DRUG EFFICACY; EFFECT SIZE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INTERNAL VALIDITY; LONG TERM CARE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHODYNAMICS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; MENTAL DISORDERS; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SAMPLE SIZE; TIME;

HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLE SIZE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77951240775     PISSN: 00333190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000313689     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Gibbons MBC, Crits-Christoph P, Hearon B: The empirical status of psychodynamic therapies. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2008; 4:93-108.
2. Leichsenring F, Rabung S: Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2008; 300:1551-1565.
3. Piper WE, Debbane EG, Bienvenu JP, Garant J: A comparative study of four forms of psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 1984; 52: 268-279.
4. Gregory RJ, Chlebowski S, Kang D, Remen AL, Soderberg MG, Stepkovitch J, Virk S: A controlled trial of psychodynamic psychotherapy for co-occurring borderline personality disorder and alcohol use disorder. Psychother Theor Res Pract Train 2008; 45: 28-41.
5. Bachar E, Latzer Y, Kreitler S, Berry EM: Empirical comparison of two psychological therapies: self psychology and cognitive orientation in the treatment of anorexia and bulimia. J Psychother Pract Res 1999; 8:115-128.
6. Bateman AW, Fonagy P: Effectiveness of partial hospitalization in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 1563-1569.
7. Da re C, Eisler I, Russell G, Trea su re J, Dodge L: Psychological therapies for adults with anorexia nervosa: randomised controlled trial of out-patient treatments. Br J Psychiatry 2001; 178:216-221.
8. Svartberg M, Stiles TC, Seltzer MH: Randomized, controlled trial of the effectiveness of short-term dynamic psychotherapy and cognitive therapy for cluster c personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161: 810-817.
9. Korner A, Gerull F, Meares R, Stevenson J: Borderline personality disorder treated with the conversational model: a replication study. Compr Psychiatry 2006; 47:406-411.
10. Clarkin JF, Levy KN, Lenzenweger MF, Kernberg OF: Evaluating three treatments for borderline personality disorder: a multi-wave study. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164:922-928.
11. Glass RM: Psychodynamic psychotherapy and research evidence: Bambi survives Godzilla? JAMA 2008; 300:1587-1589.
12. de Maat S, de Jonghe F, Schoevers R, Dekker J: The effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic therapy: a systematic review of empirical studies. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2009; 17:1-23
13. National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Depression: the treatment and management of depression in adults. National clinical practice guideline number X. London, NICE, 2009.
14. Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, Manns B, Laupland KB, Doig CJ: A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature. Crit Care 2005; 9:R575-R582
15. Dixon E, Hameed M, Sutherland F, Cook DJ, Doig C: Evaluating meta-analyses in the general surgical literature: a critical appraisal. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 450-459.
16. Sensky T: The effectiveness of cognitive therapy for schizophrenia: what can we learn from the meta-analyses? Psychother Psycho-som 2005; 74:131-135.
17. Lipsey MW, Wilson DB: Practical Meta-Analysis. London, Thousand Oaks, 2001.
18. Higgins JP, Altman DG: Assessing risk of bias in included studies; in Higgins J, Green S (eds): Cochrane collaboration for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. www.cochrane-hand-book.org
19. Egger M, Smith GD, Sterne JAC: Uses and abuses of meta-analysis. Clin Med 2001; 1: 478-484.
20. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gotzsche PC, Lang T: The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 657-662.
21. Roepke S, Renneberg B: Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy. JAMA 2009; 301: 931-932.
22. Thombs BD, Bassel M, Jewett L: Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychot herapy. JAMA 2009; 301: 930.
23. Kriston L, Holzel L, Harter M: Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychot herapy. JAMA 2009; 301: 930-931.
24. Beck AT, Bhar SS: Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy. JAMA 2009; 301: 931.
25. McCartney K, Rosenthal R: Effect size, practical importance, and social policy for children. Child Dev 2000; 71: 1 7 3-1 8 0.
26. Levy KN, Meehan KB, Kelly KM, Reynoso JS, Weber M, Clarkin JF, Kernberg OF: Change in attachment patterns and reflective function in a randomized control trial of transference-focused psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 2006; 74:1027-1040.
27. Begg CB, Mazumdar M: Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994; 50:1088-1101.
28. Kraemer HC, Gardner C, Brooks JO III, Ye-savage JA: Advantages of excluding underpowered studies in meta-analysis: inclusion-ist versus exclusionist viewpoints. Psychol Met hods 1998; 3: 23-31.
29. Chambless DL, Hollon SD: Defining empirically supported therapies. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998; 66: 7-18.
30. DeRubeis RJ, Brotman MA, Gibbons CJ: A conceptual and methodological analysis of the nonspecifics argument. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2005; 12:174-183.
31. Scott J, Sensky T: Methodological aspects of randomized controlled trials of psychotherapy in primary care. Psychol Med 2003; 33: 191-19 6.
32. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carrol D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ: Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17:1-12.
33. Sharpe L, RyanB, Allard S, Sensky T: Testing for the integrity of blinding in clinical trials: how valid are forced choice paradigms? Psy-chother Psychosom 2003; 72:128-131.
34. Newell DJ: Intention-to-treat-analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research. Int J Epidemiol 1992; 21: 837-841.
35. Streiner DL: The case of the missing data: methods of dealing with dropouts and other research vagaries. Can J Psychiatry 2002; 47: 68-75.
36. Sensky T: Evaluating the evidence base of consultation-liaison psychiatry; in Streltzer J, Hoyle L (eds): Handbook of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. New York, Springer, 2008, pp 28-36.
37. Waltz J, Addis ME, Koerner K, Jacobson NS: Testing the integrity of a psychotherapy protocol: assessment of adherence and competence. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993; 61: 620-630.
38. Perepletchikova F, Treat TA, Kazdin AE: Treatment integrity in psychotherapy research: analysis of the studies and examination of the associated factors. J Consult Clin Psychol 2007; 75: 829-841.
39. Fredric B, Barbara M, Larry S: A study demonstrating efficacy of a psychoanalytic psychotherapy for panic disorder: implications for psychoanalytic research, theory, and practice. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2009; 57: 131-148.
40. Blatt SJ: The effort to identify empirically supported psychological treatments and its implications for clinical research, practice, and training: commentary on papers by Lester Luborsky and Hans H. Strupp. Psychoanal Dialogues 2001; 11:635-646.
41. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter AC, Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter LM: Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007; 7:10-17.