Multiple sclerosis impairs ability to detect abrupt appearance of a subliminal stimulus

Neurological Research

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 297-302

  Carrubba, Simona ^a   Minagar, Alireza ^b   Gonzalez Toledo, Eduardo ^b   Chesson, Andrew L ^b   Frilot II, Clifton ^a   Marino, Andrew A ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^b Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport   (United States)

Author keywords

Complexity conjecture; Functional test; Onset response; Whole brain states

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NEUROPATHOLOGY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; SENSORY STIMULATION; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; SUBLIMINAL STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77951218731     PISSN: 01616412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/016164109X12536042424135     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M, et al. Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 938-952
2. Minagar A. Gray matter involvement in multiple sclerosis: A new window into pathogenesis. J Neuroimaging 2003; 13: 291-292 (Pubitemid 37159014)
3. de Stefano N, Matthews PM, Filippi M, et al. Evidence of early cortical atrophy in MS: Relevance to white matter changes and disability. Neurology 2003; 60: 1157-1162 (Pubitemid 36418778)
4. Minagar A. Multiple sclerosis: Current knowledge and future directions. Neurol Res 2006; 28: 227-229 (Pubitemid 43765104)
5. Gazzaniga MS. The New Cognitive Neurosciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000
6. Leocani L, Comi G. Neurophysiological markers. Neurol Sci 2008; 29 (Suppl. 2): S218-S221
7. Regan D. Human Brain Electrophysiology: Evoked Potentials and Evoked Magnetic Fields in Science and Medicine, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1989
8. Rubinov M, Sporns O, van Leeuwen C, et al. Symbiotic relationship between brain structure and dynamics. BMC Neurosci 2009; 10: 55
9. Downar J, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ, et al. A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nat Neurosci 2000; 3: 277-283 (Pubitemid 30140791)
10. Bair W. No doubt about offset latency. Vis Neurosci 2004; 21: 671-674
11. Pratt H, Starr A, Michalewski HJ, et al. The auditory P50 component to onset and offset of sound. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 376-387 (Pubitemid 350297144)
12. Yamashiro K, Inui K, Otsuru N, et al. Somatosensory off-response in humans: An MEG study. Neuroimage 2009; 44: 1363-1368
13. Carrubba S, Frilot C, Chesson A, et al. Detection of nonlinear event-related potentials. J Neurosci Meth 2006; 157: 39-47 (Pubitemid 44287071)
14. Carrubba S, Frilot C, Chesson AL, Jr, et al. Evidence of a nonlinear human magnetic sense. Neuroscience 2007; 144: 356-367 (Pubitemid 44839044)
15. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001; 50: 121-127
16. Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: Results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology 1996; 46: 907-911 (Pubitemid 26134623)
17. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983; 33: 1444-1452
18. Freeman WJ, Skarda CA. Spatial EEG patterns, non-linear dynamics and perception: The neo-Sherringtonian view. Brain Res 1985; 357: 147-175
19. Gómez-Herrero G, Atienza M, Egiazarian K, et al. Measuring directional coupling between EEG sources. Neuroimage 2008; 43: 497-508
20. Moeller S, Freiwald WA, Tsao DY. Patches with links: A unified system for processing faces in the macaque temporal lobe. Science 2008; 320: 1355-1359 (Pubitemid 351929474)
21. Carrubba S, Frilot II C, Hart FX, et al. The electric field is a sufficient physical determinant of the human magnetic sense. Int J Radiat Biol 2009; 85: 622-632
22. Gawne-Cain ML, O'Riordan JI, Coles A, et al. MRI lesion volume measurement in multiple sclerosis and its correlation with disability: A comparison of fast fluid attenuated inversion recovery (fFLAIR) and spin echo sequences. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1998; 64: 197-203 (Pubitemid 28159801)
23. Nakashima I, Fujihara K, Miyazawa H, et al. Relevance of callosal and periventricular MRI lesions to oligoclonal bands in multiople sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 2006; 113: 125-131
24. Zbilut JP, Webber CL, Jr. Recurrence quantification analysis. In: Akay M, ed. Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006: pp. 2979-2986
25. Bandini F, Pierantozzi M, Bodis-Wollner I. Parkinson's disease changes the balance of onset and offset visual responses: An evoked potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 976-983 (Pubitemid 32497240)
26. Clementz BA, Keil A, Kissler J. Aberrant brain dynamics in schizophrenia: Delayed buildup and prolonged decay of the visual steady-state response. Cogn Brain Res 2004; 18: 121-129 (Pubitemid 38084928)
27. Kreegipuu K, Allik J. Detection of motion onset and offset: Reaction time and visual evoked potential analysis. Psychol Res 2007; 71: 703-708
28. Okada T, Honda M, Okamoto J, et al. Activation of the primary and association auditory cortex by the transition of sound intensity: A new method for functional examination of the auditory cortex in humans. Neurosci Lett 2004; 359: 119-123 (Pubitemid 38446652)
29. Tanaka E, Inui K, Kida T, et al. Common cortical responses evoked by appearance, disappearance and change of the human face. BMC Neurosci 2009; 10: 38-46
30. Marino AA, Nilsen E, Frilot C. Localization of electroreceptive function in rabbits. Physiol Behav 2003; 79: 803-810 (Pubitemid 37087978)
31. Frilot C 2nd, Carrubba S, Marino AA. Magnetosensory function in rats: Localization using positron emission tomography. Synapse 2009; 63: 421-428
32. Gundogan FC, Demirkaya S, Sobaci G. Is optical coherence tomography really a new biomarker candidate in multiple sclerosis? - A structural and functional evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 5773-5781 (Pubitemid 351260883)
33. van Dijk JG, Jennekens-Schinkel A, Caekebeke JF, et al. What is the validity of an 'abnormal' evoked or event-related potential in MS? Auditory and visual evoked and event-related potentials in multiple sclerosis patients and normal subjects. J Neurol Sci 1992; 109: 11-17
34. Aminoff MJ, Davis SL, Panitch HS. Serial evoked potentials studies in patients with definite multiple sclerosis. Clinical relevance. Arch Neurol 1984; 41: 1197-1202
35. Davis SL, Aminoff MJ, Panitch HS. Clinical correlations of serial somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1985; 35: 359-365 (Pubitemid 15100676)
36. Leocani L, Comi G. Neurophysiological investigations in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 2000; 13: 255-261 (Pubitemid 30406531)
37. Filippi M, Rovaris M, Rocca MA. Imaging primary progressive multiple sclerosis: The contribution of structural, metabolic, and functional MRI techniques. Mult Scler 2004; 10 (Suppl. 1): S36-S44 (Pubitemid 38807475)
38. Sweet LH, Rao SM, Primeau M, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging response to increased verbal working memory demands among patients with multiple sclerosis. Human Brain Mapp 2006; 27: 28-36 (Pubitemid 43202732)
39. Phillips MD. Functional faults: fMRI in MS. Neurology 2008; 70: 248-249
40. Webber CL, Jr. Recurrence quantification analysis. Available at: http://homepages.luc.edu/ycwebber[June 2009]