No doubt about offset latency

Visual Neuroscience

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 671-674

  Bair, Wyeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Neuronal integration time; Response latency; Response offset

Indexed keywords

CALCULATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LATENT PERIOD; LATERAL GENICULATE NUCLEUS; NERVE CELL STIMULATION; NERVE CONDUCTION; NERVE POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; REVIEW; SPIKE; TECHNIQUE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; VISUAL STIMULATION; WAKEFULNESS;

ANIMALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; NEURONS; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 12144282435     PISSN: 09525238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0952523804215012     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. ADRIAN E.D. & MATTHEWS, R. (1927). The action of light on the eye. Part I. The discharge of impulses in the optic never and its relation to the electric changes in the retina. Journal of Physiology (London) 63, 378-414.
2. Azouz, R. & GRAY, C.M. (1999). Cellular mechanisms contributing to a response variability of cortical neurons in vivo. Journal of Neuroscience 19, 2209-2223.
3. BAIR, W., CAVANAUGH, J.R., SMITH, M.A. & MOVSHON, J.A. (2002). The timing of response onset and offset in macaque visual neurons. Journal of Neuroscience 22, 3189-3205.
4. BAIR, W., CAVANAUGH, J.R. & MOVSHON, J.A. (2003). Time course and time-distance relationships for surround suppression in macaque VI neurons. Journal of Neuroscience 23, 7690-7701.
5. BUGMANN, G. (1992). The neuronal computation time. In Artificial Neural Networks II: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. Brighton, UK, Sept. 4-7, ed. ALEKSANDER, I. & TAYLOR J., pp. 861-864. Elsevier Science Publishers.
6. COENEN, A.M.L., GERRITS, H.J.M. & VENDRIK, A.J.H. (1972). Analysis of the response characteristics of optic tract and geniculate units and their mutual relationship. Experimental Brain Research 15, 452-471.
7. GAWNE, T.A. & WOODS, J.M. (2003). Video-rate and continuous visual stimuli do not produce equivalent timings in visual cortical neurons. Visual Neuroscience 20, 495-500.
8. HARTLINE, H.K. (1938). The response of single optic nerve fibers of the vertebrate eye to illumination of the retina. American Journal of Physiology 121, 400-415.
9. HUBEL, D.H. & WIESEL, T.N. (1962). Receptive fields binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 160, 106-154.
10. HUMPHREY, A.L. & WELLER, R.E. (1988). Functionally distinct groups of X-cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. Journal of Comparative Neurology 268, 429-447.
11. MASTRONARDE, D.N. (1987). Two classes of single-input X-cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. 1. Receptive field properties and classification of cells. Journal of Neurophysiology 57, 357-380.
12. OVIEDO, H., BAIR, W. & REYES, A.D. (2001). Comparison of response timing in visual cortex in vivo with somatic current injection in neocortical neurons in vitro. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 27, #123.10.
13. VOLGUSHEV, M., VIDYASAGAR, T.R. & PEI, X. (1995). Dynamics of the orientation tuning of postsynaptic potentials in the cat visual cortex. Visual Neuroscience 12, 621-628.
14. VON BAUMGARTEN, R. & JUNG, R. (1952). Microelectrode studies on the visual cortex. Revue Neurologique (Paris) 87, 151-55.