Evidence-based effectiveness of a private practice intensive outpatient program with dual diagnosis patients

Journal of Dual Diagnosis

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 25-45

  Wise, Edward A ^a  

^a PLLC   (United States)

Author keywords

Co morbid; Dual diagnosis; Effectiveness; Evaluation; Evidence based; Intensive outpatient; Outcomes; Program; Treatment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRIEF SYMPTOM INVENTORY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DEPRESSION; DUAL DIAGNOSIS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HOMICIDE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIVATE PRACTICE; RATING SCALE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; SUICIDAL IDEATION; SYMPTOM CHECKLIST 90; THERAPY EFFECT; TREATMENT DURATION;

EID: 77951209624     PISSN: 15504263     EISSN: 15504271     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15504260903498862     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Amor, D., Polich, J., & Stambul, H. (1978). Alcoholism and treatment. New York: Wiley Interscience.
2. Attkisson, C., & Greenfield, T. (1994). Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 and Service Satisfaction Scale-30. In M. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Babor, T. F., Steinberg, K., Anton, R., & Del Boca, F. (2000). Talk is cheap: Measuring drinking outcomes in clinical trials. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 55-63. (Pubitemid 30005059)
4. Babor, T. F., Stephens, R. S., & Marlatt, G. A. (1987). Verbal report methods in clinical research on alcoholism: Response bias and its minimization. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 48, 410-424.
5. Barry, A., & Lefkovitz, P. (2006). Overview of the partial hospitalization & intensive outpatient industry: 2005. Portsmouth, VA: Association for Ambulatory Behavioral Healthcare.
6. Beutler, L. E. (2002). The dodo bird is extinct. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(1), 30-34.
7. Borntrager, C., Chorpita, B., Higa-McMillan, C., & Weisz, J. (2009). Provider attitudes towards evidence-based practices: Are the concerns with the evidence or with the manuals? Psychiatric Services, 60(5), 677-681.
8. Cisler, R. A., Kowalchuk, R. K., Saunders, S. M., Zweben, A., & Trinh, H. Q. (2005). Applying clinical significance methodology to alcoholism treatment trials: Determining recovery outcome status with individual- and population-based measures. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(11), 1991-2000. (Pubitemid 41790837)
9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Connors, G. J., & Maisto, S. A. (2003). Drinking reports from collateral individuals. Addiction, 98(suppl 2), 21-29.
11. Dasgupta, A. (2007). The effects of adulterants and selected ingested compounds on drugs-of-abuse testing in urine. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 128(3), 491-503. (Pubitemid 47479983)
12. Derogatis, L. (1994). SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring and procedures manual-II. Minneapolis, MN: NCS, Pearson.
13. Derogatis, L. (2001). Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis, MN: NCS, Pearson.
14. Drake, R. E., Mercer-McFadden, C., Mueser, K. T., McHugo, G. J., & Bond, G. R. (1998). Review of integrated mental health and substance abuse treatment for patients with dual disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24(4), 589-608. (Pubitemid 28524628)
15. Drake, R. E., O'Neal, E., & Wallach, M. (2008). A systematic review of psychosocial research on psychosocial interventions for people with co-occurring severe mental and substance abuse disorders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 34(1), 123-138. (Pubitemid 350216356)
16. Dutra, L., Stathopoulou, G., Basden, S., Leyro, T., Powers, M., & Otto, M. (2008). A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(2), 179-187. (Pubitemid 351704516)
17. Granholm, E., Anthenelli, R., Monteiro, R., Sevcik, J., & Stolar, M. (2003). Brief integrated outpatient dual diagnosis treatment reduces psychiatric hospitalizations. American Journal of Addictions, 12(4), 306-313. (Pubitemid 37175523)
18. Grant, B., Stinson, F., Dawson, D., Chou, P., Dufour, M., Compton, W., et al. (2004). Prevalence and co-occurrence of substance use disorders and independent mood and anxiety disorders: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61(8), 807-816. (Pubitemid 39031120)
19. Hesse, M. (2009). Integrated psychological treatment for substance use and comorbid anxiety or depression vs. treatment for substance use alone: A systematic review of the published literature. BMC Psychiatry, 9(6), 1-8.
20. Howard, K. I., Lueger, R. J., Maling, M. S., & Martinovich, Z. (1993). A phase model of psychotherapy outcome: Causal mediation of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 678-685. (Pubitemid 23230091)
21. Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, P. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy: Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. American Psychologist, 51(10), 1059-1064. (Pubitemid 126418002)
22. Hser, Y., Maglione, M., & Boyle, K. (1999). Validity of self-report of drug use among STD patients, ER patients and arrestees. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 25(1), 81-91. (Pubitemid 29100795)
23. Jacobson, N. S. (1999). The role of the allegiance effect in psychotherapy research: Controlling and accounting for it. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6(1), 116-119.
24. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12-19.
25. Jaffee, W. B., Trucco, E., Levy, S., & Weiss, R. D. (2007). Is this urine really negative? A systematic review of tampering methods in urine drug screening and testing. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(1), 33-42. (Pubitemid 350214457)
26. Lambert, M. (1999). Are differential treatment effects inflated by researcher therapy allegiance? Could Clever Hans count? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6(1), 127-130.
27. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Luborsky, L., Diguer, L., Seligman, D., Rosenthal, R., Krause, E., Johnson, S., et al. (1999). The researcher's own therapy allegiances: A "wild card" in comparisons of treatment efficacy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6(1), 95-106.
29. Luborsky, L., Rosenthal, R., Diguer, L., Andrusyna, T., Berman, J., Levitt, J., et al. (2002). The dodo bird verdict is alive and well-mostly. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(1), 2-12. (Pubitemid 41288903)
30. Luty, J., Perry, V., Umoh, O., & Gormer, D. (2006). Validation and development of a self-report outcome measures (MAP-sc) in opiate addiction. Psychiatric Bulletin, 30, 134-139.
31. Maisto, S. A., & Cooper, A. (1980). A historical perspective on alcohol and drug treatment outcome research. In L. C. Sobell, M. B. Sobell, & E. Ward (Eds.), Evaluating alcohol and drug abuse treatment effectiveness: Recent advances (pp. 1-14). New York: Pergamon.
32. Marlatt, G. A., Stephens, R. S., Kivlahan, D., Buef, J. J., & Banaji, M. (1986). Empirical evidence on the reliability and validity of selfireports of alcohol use and associated behaviors. Workshop on the Validity of Self-Report in Alcoholism Treatment Research. Washington, DC: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
33. Marsden, J., Gossop, M., Stewart, D., Best, D., Farrell, M., & Strang, J. (1998). The Maudsley Addiction Profile: A brief instrument for treatment outcome research. Development and user manual. London: National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry.
34. McLellan, A. T., Luborsky, L., Cacciola, J., Griffith, J., Evans, F., Barr, H., et al. (1985). New data from the Addiction Severity Index: Reliability and validity in three centres. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 173(7), 412-423. (Pubitemid 15068966)
35. Miller, W. R. (2004a). Enhancingmotivation for change in substance abuse treatment. Rockville, MD: SAMSHA, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
36. Miller, W. R. (Ed.). (2004b). COMBINE Monograph Series, Volume 1. Combined behavioral interventions manual: A clinical research guide for therapists treating people with alcohol abuse and dependence. DHHS Publication No. 04-5288. Bethesda, MD: NIAAA.
37. Miller, W. R., & Wilbourne, P. (2002). Mesa Grande: A methodological analysis of clinical trials of treatments for alcohol use disorders. Addiction, 97(3), 265-277. (Pubitemid 34250721)
38. O'Farrell, T., & Maisto, S. A. (1987). The utility of self-report and biological measures of alcohol consumption in alcoholism treatment outcome studies. Advances in Behavioral Research and Therapy, 9(2-3), 91-125.
39. Polich, J. (1982). The validity of self-reports in alcoholism research. Addictive Behaviors, 7(2), 123-132. (Pubitemid 12063527)
40. Roberts, L. J., Neal, D. J., Kivlahan, D. R., Baer, J. S., & Marlatt, G. A. (2000). Individual drinking changes following a brief intervention among college students: Clinical significance in an indicated preventive context. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(3), 500-505.
41. Shaw, B. (1999). How to use the allegiance effect to maximize competence and therapeutic outcomes. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6(1), 131-132.
42. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Skinner, H. A. (1984). Assessing alcohol use by patients in treatment. In R. C. Smart, H. D. Cappell, F. B. Glaser, Y. Israel, H. Kalant, R. E. Popham, et al. (Eds.), Research advances in alcohol and drug problems, 8, 183-1107 New York: Plenum Press.
44. Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1978). Validity of self-reports in three populations of alcoholics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(5), 901-907.
45. Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1981). Outcome criteria and the assessment of alcohol treatment efficacy. Evaluation of the alcoholic: Implications for research theory and treatment. (Research monograph 5, pp. 369-382). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
46. Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1982). Alcoholism treatment outcome evaluation methodology, prevention, intervention and treatment. Concerns and models. (Alcohol and health monograph 3, pp. 293-321). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
47. Sobell, L. C., Sobell, M. B., Connors, G., & Agrawal, S. (2003). Assessing drinking outcomes in alcohol treatment efficacy studies: Selecting a yardstick of success. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 27(10), 1661-1666. (Pubitemid 37280749)
48. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2007). Results from the 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings (Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-32, DHHS Publication No. SMA 07-4293). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
49. Thase, M. (1999). What is the investigator allegiance effect and what should we do about it? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6(1), 113-115.
50. Tiet, Q., & Mausbach, B. (2007). Treatments for patients with dual diagnosis: A review. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 31(4), 513-536. (Pubitemid 46434889)
51. Timko, C., Chen, S., Sempel, J., & Barnett, P. (2006). Dual diagnosis patients in community or hospital care: One year outcomes and health care utilization and costs. Journal of Mental Health, 15(2), 163-177. (Pubitemid 43754933)
52. Tingey, R., Lambert, M., Burlingame, G., & Hansen, N. (1996). Assessing clinical significance: Proposed extensions to method. Psychotherapy Research, 6(2), 109-123. (Pubitemid 126559313)
53. Wise, E. A. (1999). Clinical outcomes, client satisfaction and innovative programming in private practice. In K. M. Coughlin (Ed). Behavioral outcomes & guidelines sourcebook: A practical guide to measuring, managing and standardizing mental health and substance abuse treatment (pp. 135-143). New York: Faulkner & Gray.
54. Wise, E. A. (2000). Mental health intensive outpatient programming: An outcome and satisfaction evaluation of a private practice model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31(4), 412-417.
55. Wise, E. A. (2003a). Empirical validation of a mental health intensive outpatient program in a private practice setting. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 73(4), 405-410.
56. Wise, E. A. (2003b). Psychotherapy outcome and satisfaction methods applied to intensive outpatient programming in a private practice setting. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice and Training, 40(3), 203-214.
57. Wise, E. A. (2004). Methods for analyzing psychotherapy outcomes: A review of clinical significance, reliable change and recommendations for future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(1), 50-59.
58. Wise, E. A. (2005). Effectiveness of intensive outpatient programming in private practice: Integrating practice, outcomes and business. American Psychologist, 60(8), 885-895.