Probabilistic neural network approach to the classification of demonstrative pronouns for indirect anaphora in Hindi

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 5607-5613

  Dutta, Kamlesh ^a   Prakash, Nupur ^b   Kaushik, Saroj ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY   (India)

^c INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

Anaphora; Neural network; Semantic

Indexed keywords

ANAPHORA; CLASSIFICATION SCHEME; LINGUISTIC PATTERNS; NOUN PHRASE; PROBABILISTIC NEURAL NETWORKS; SEMANTIC CUES; SEMANTIC INFERENCE;

LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 77951205638     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.052     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bahri H. Hindi semantics (1959), Bharti Press, Allahbad
2. Baker P., Hardie A., McEnery T., Xiao R., Bontcheva K., Cunningham H., et al. Corpus linguistics and South Asian languages: Corpus creation and tool development. Literary and Linguistic Computing 19 4 (2004) 509-524
3. Bonnie L.W. Structure and ostension in the interpretation of discourse deixis. Language and Cognitive Processes 6 2 (1991) 107-135
4. Botley, S. P. (1996). Comparing demonstrative features in three written English genres. In S. P. Botley, J. Glass, A. M. McEnery, & A. Wilson (Eds.), Approaches to discourse anaphora: Proceedings of the discourse anaphora and resolution colloquium (DAARC96) (pp. 86-105).
5. Botley S.P., and McEnery A.M. Demonstratives in English: A corpus-based study. Journal of English Linguistics 29 (2001) 7-33
6. Boyd, A., Gegg-Harrison, W., & Byron, D. (2005). Identifying non-referential it: A machine learning approach incorporating linguistically motivated patterns. In Proceedings of the ACL workshop on feature engineering for machine learning in NLP (pp. 40-47). Ann Arbor.
7. Brown-Schmidt S., Byron D.K., and Tanenhaus M.K. Beyond salience: Interpretation of personal and demonstrative pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language 53 2 (2005) 292-313
8. Byron, D. K. (2002). Resolving pronominal reference to abstract entities. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 80-87). Philadelphia, Penn.
9. Davison A. Lexical anaphors and pronouns in Hindi/Urdu. In: Lust B.C., Wali K., Gair J.W., and Subbarao K.V. (Eds). Lexical anaphors and pronouns in selected South Asian languages (2000), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 397-470
10. Denber, M. (1998). Automatic resolution of anaphora in English. Technical Report, Imaging Science Division, Eastman Kodak Co.
11. Eckert M., and Strube M. Dialogue acts, synchronizing units, and anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 17 1 (2000) 51-89
12. Evans R. Applying machine learning toward an automatic classification of It. Literary and Linguistic Computing 16 1 (2001) 45-57
13. Fan, J., Barker, K., & Porter, B. (2005). Indirect anaphora resolution as semantic path search. KCAP' 05, October 2-5. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
14. Gelbukh, A., & Sidrov, G. (1999a). On indirect anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of PACLING (pp. 181-190). Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
15. Gelbukh, A., & Sidrov, G. (1999b). Word choice problem and anaphora resolution, ISMT-CLIP.
16. Gundel, J., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (2007). Directly and indirectly anaphoric demonstrative and personal pronouns in newspaper articles. In Proceedings of the sixth annual discourse anaphora and anaphora resolution colloquium.
17. Gundel J., Hedberg N., and Zacharski R. Pronouns without NP antecedents: How do we know when a pronoun is referential. In: Branco A., McEnery T., and Mitkov R. (Eds). Anaphora processing: linguistic, cognitive and computational modelling (2005), John Benjamins 351-364
18. Gundel J.K., Hegarty M., and Borthen K. Cognitive status, information structure, and pronominal reference to causally introduced entities. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 3 (2003) 281-299
19. Haykin S. Neural networks a comprehensive foundation (2006), Pearson Education
20. Kennedy, C., & Boguraev, B. (1996). Anaphora for everyone: Pronominal anaphora resolution without a parser. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on computational linguistics (COLINC'96) (pp. 113-118). Copenhagen, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
21. Kunz, K., & Hansen-Schirra, S. (2003). Coreference annotation of the tiger treebank. In Proceedings of the workshop treebanks and linguistic theories. (pp. 221-224). Vaxjo.
22. Lappin S., and Leass H.J. An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics 20 4 (1994) 535-561
23. Orasan C., Evans R., and Mitkov R. Enhancing preference-based anaphora resolution with genetic algorithms. In: Christodoulakis (Ed). Proceedings of natural language processing - NLP 2000 (2000), Springer-Verlag, Germany 185-195
24. Paice C.D., and Husk G.D. Towards an automatic recognition of anaphoric features in English text; the impersonal pronoun 'it'. Computer Speech and Language 2 (1987) 109-132
25. Pandharipande R., and Kachru Y. Relational grammar, ergativity, and Hindi-Urdu. Lingua 41 (1977) 217-238
26. Poesio, M., imWalde, S. S., & Brew, C. (1998). Lexical clustering and definite description interpretation. In Proceedings of the AAAI spring symposium on learning for discourse (pp. 82-89).
27. Rao M.A., Srinivas J., and Rao A.M. Neural networks: Algorithms and applications (2003), Alpha Science International Limited
28. Sinha, S. (2003). A corpus-based account of anaphor resolution in Hindi. MA Thesis, University of Lancaster, UK.
29. Specht D.F. Probabilistic neural networks for classification, mapping, or associative memory. IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks I (1998) 525-532