Demonstratives in English: A Corpus-Based Study

Journal of English Linguistics

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 7-33

  Botley, Simon ^a   Mcenery, Tony ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993710056     PISSN: 00754242     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00754240122005170     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Biber, D. 1992. Using Computer-Based Text Corpora to Analyse the Referential Strategies of Spoken and Written Texts. In Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, edited by J. Svartvik, 213-252. Berlin: Mouton.
2. Botley, S. P. 1996. Comparing Demonstrative Features in Three Written English Genres. In Approaches to Discourse Anaphora: Proceedings of the Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (DAARC96), 17-18th July 1996, edited by S. P. Botley, J. Glass, A. M. McEnery, and A. Wilson, 86-105. Lancaster, UK: UCRELTechnical Papers Special Issue 8, Lancaster University.
3. Botley, S. P. 1999. Corpora and Discourse Anaphora: Using Corpus Evidence to Test Theoretical Claims. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Linguistics and Modern English Language, Lancaster University.
4. Buühler, K. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Jena, Germany: Fischer.
5. Cornish, F. 1986. Anaphoric Relations in English and French: A Discourse Perspective. London: Croom Helm.
6. Croft, W. 1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Dunning, T. 1993. Accurate Methods for the Statistics of Surprise and Coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19 (1): 61-74.
8. Fligelstone, S. D. 1992. Developing a Scheme for Annotating Text to Show Anaphoric Relations. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on English Language Research on Computer Corpora, edited by G. Leitner, 153-160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
9. Fox, B. A. 1987. Discourse Structure and Anaphora. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Fraurud, K. 1992a. Processing Noun Phrases in Natural Discourse. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.
11. Fraurud, K. 1992b. Situation Reference: What Does “It” Refer To?GAP Working Paper No. 24. Hamburg: Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Hamburg.
12. Garside, R., S. Fligelstone, and S. P. Botley. 1997. Discourse Annotation: Anaphoric Relations in Corpora. In Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora, edited by R. Garside, G. Leech, and A. M. McEnery, 66-84. London: Addison-Wesley Longman.
13. Garside, R., G. Leech, and A. M. McEnery, eds. 1997. Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora. London: Addison-Wesley Longman.
14. Garside, R., G. Leech, and G. Sampson, eds. 1987. The Computational Analysis of English: A Corpus-Based Approach. London: Longman.
15. Halliday, M.A.K., and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
16. Himmelmann, N. P. 1996. Demonstratives in Narrative Discourse: A Taxonomy of Universal Uses. In Studies in Anaphora, edited by B. A. Fox, 205-254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Jackson, H. 1990. Grammar and Meaning: A Semantic Approach to English Grammar. London: Longman.
18. Lakoff, R. T. 1974. Remarks on Thisand That. In Papers from the 10th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 345-356. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
19. Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Lyons, J. 1979. Deixis and Anaphora. In The Development of Conversation and Discourse, edited by T. Myers, 88-103. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
22. MacLaren, R. 1982. The Semantics and Pragmatics of English Demonstratives. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
23. McCarthy, M. 1994. It, Thisand That. In Advances in Written Text Analysis, edited by M. McCarthy, 266-275. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
24. McEnery, A. M., I. Tanaka, and S. Botley. 1997. Corpus Annotation and Reference Resolution. Paper presented at a workshop sponsored by the Association for Computational Linguistics, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia, July, Madrid, Spain.
25. McEnery, A. M., and A. Wilson. 1996. Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
26. Oakes, M. P. 1998. Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
27. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. N. Leech, and J. Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
28. Rayson, P., G. Leech, and M. Hodges. 1997. Social Differentiation in the Use of English Vocabulary: Some Analyses of the Conversational Component of the British National Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2 (1): 133-152.
29. Scott, M. R. 1994. Wordsmith Tools. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30. Semino, E. 1997. Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. London: Addison-Wesley Longman.