Theory-based considerations influence the interpretation of generic sentences

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 261-276

  Cimpian, Andrei ^a   Gelman, Susan A ^b   Brandone, Amanda C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Generic language; Language comprehension; Psychological essentialism; Quantifiers

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MENTAL TASK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THEORY VALIDATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 77951199308     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960903025227     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ahn, W., Kim, N. S., Lassaline, M. E., & Dennis, M. J. (2000). Causal status as a determinant of feature centrality. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 361-416.
2. Barrett, S. E., Abdi, H., Murphy, G. L., & Gallagher, J. M. (1993). Theory-based correlations and their role in children's concepts. Child Development, 64(6), 1595-1616.
3. Brandone, A. C., & Gelman, S. A. (2009). Differences in preschoolers' and adults' use of generics about novel animals and artifacts: A window onto a conceptual divide. Cognition, 110, 1-22.
4. Carlson, G. N. (1977). Reference to kinds in English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachussetts, Amherst.
5. Carlson, G. N., & Pelletier, F. J. (1995). The generic book. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
6. Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1969). Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74(3), 271-280.
7. Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. London: Oxford University Press.
8. Gelman, S. A. (2004). Learning words for kinds: Generic noun phrases in acquisition. In D. G. Hall & S. R. Waxman (Eds.), Weaving a lexicon (pp. 445-484). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Gelman, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2007). Developmental changes in the understanding of generics. Cognition, 105(1), 166-183.
10. Gelman, S. A., Star, J. R., & Flukes, J. E. (2002). Children's use of generics in inductive inferences. Journal of Cognition and Development, 3, 179-199.
11. Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essences: Early understandings of the nonobvious. Cognition, 38, 213-244.
12. Hickling, A. K., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). How does your garden grow? Early conceptualization of seeds and their place in the plant growth cycle. Child Development, 66, 856-876.
13. Keil, F. C. (1992). The origins of an autonomous biology. In M. R. Gunnar & M. Maratsos (Eds.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology: Modularity and constraints in language and cognition (pp. 103-137). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
14. Leslie, S. J. (2008). Generics: Cognition and acquisition. Philosophical Review, 117, 1-47.
15. Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.
16. Prasada, S. (2000). Acquiring generic knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 66-72.
17. Prasada, S., & Dillingham, E. M. (2006). Principled and statistical connections in common sense conception. Cognition, 99, 73-112.
18. Rehder, B., & Hastie, R. (2001). Causal knowledge and categories: The effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 323-360.