Preface to sexual scripts: Social and therapeutic implications

Sexual and Relationship Therapy

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 91-95

  McCormick, Naomi B ^a  

^a Clinical Health Psychologists   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951167670     PISSN: 14681994     EISSN: 14681749     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14681990903563707     Document Type: Editorial

References (24)

1. Bowleg, L., Lucas, K.J., & Tschann, J.M. (2004). "The ball was always in his court": An exploratory analysis of relationship scripts, sexual scripts and condom use among African American women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 70-82.
2. Byers, E.S., & Heinlein, L. (1989). Predicting initiations and refusals of sexual activities in married and cohabiting heterosexual couples. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 210-231.
3. Clements-Schreiber, M.E., Rempel, J.K., & Desmarais, S. (1998). Women's sexual pressure tactics and adherence to related attitudes: A step toward prediction. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 197-205.
4. Dworkin, S.L., & O'Sullivan, L.O. (2005). Actual versus desired initiation patterns among a sample of college men: Tapping disjunctures within traditional male sexual scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 150-158.
5. Dworkin, S.L., & O'Sullivan, L.O. (2007). "It's less work for us and it shows us she has good taste": Masculinity, sexual initiation and contemporary sexual scripts. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
6. Epstein, M., Calzo, J.P., Smiler, A.P., & Ward, L.M. (2009). "Anything from making out to having sex": Men's benefit negotiations of hooking up and friends with benefits scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 414-424.
7. Frey, K., & Hojjat, M. (1998). Are love styles related to sexual styles? Journal of Sex Research, 35,265-271.
8. Greene, K., & Faulkner, S.L. (2005). Gender, belief in the sexual double standard and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships. Sex Roles, 53, 239-251.
9. Humphreys, T. (2007). Perceptions of sexual consent: The impact of relationship history and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 307-315.
10. Jackson, S. (2007). The sexual self in late modernity. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
11. Kiefer, A.K., Sanchez, D.T., Kalinka, C.J., & Ybarra, O. (2006). How women's non-conscious association of sex with submission related to their subjective sexual arousability and ability to reach orgasm. Sex Roles, 55, 83-94.
12. Kim, J.L., Sorsoli, C.L., Collins, K., Zylbergold, B.A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D.L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 145-157.
13. MacNeil, S., & Byers, S. (2009). Role of sexual self-disclosure in the sexual satisfaction of long-term heterosexual couples. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 3-14.
14. Marks, M.J., & Fraley, C. (2006). Confirmation bias and the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 54, 19-26.
15. Maticka-Tyndale, E., & Herold, E.S. (1997). The scripting of sexual behaviour: Canadian university students on spring break in Florida. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 6, 317-328.
16. McCormick, N.B. (1987). Sexual scripts: Social and therapeutic implications. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 2(1), 3-27.
17. Miller, S.A., & Byers, E.S. (2004). Actual and desired duration of foreplay and intercourse. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 301-309.
18. O'Sullivan, L., & Byers, E.S. (1992). College students' incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions. Journal of Sex Research, 29, 435-446.
19. O'Sullivan, L., & Byers, E.S. (1993). Eroding stereotypes: College women's attempts to influence reluctant male sexual partners. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 270-282.
20. Plummer, K. (2007). Queers, bodies and postmodern sexualities: A note on revisiting the "sexual" in symbolic interactionism. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
21. Ross, M. (2005). Typing, doing and being: Sexuality and the Internet. Journal of Sex Research, 42,343-352.
22. Sewell, K.K., & Muehlenhard, C.L. (2009, November). Who came first: The implication of orgasm sequence during sexual encounters. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico.
23. Simms, D.C., & Byers, E.S. (2009). Interpersonal perceptions of desired frequency of sexual behaviors. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 18, 15-25.
24. Wyatt-Seal, D., O'Sullivan, L., & Ehrhardt, A.A. (2007). Miscommunication and misinterpretations: Men's scripts about sexual communication and unwanted sex in interactions with women. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.