Are love styles related to sexual styles?

Journal of Sex Research

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 265-271

  Frey, Kurt ^a   Hojjat, Mahzad ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; LOVE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RATING SCALE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL INTERCOURSE; SEXUALITY;

EID: 0031654653     PISSN: 00224499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224499809551942     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abelson, R. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36, 715-729.
2. Bandura, A. J. (1977). Social learning theory. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Bettor, L., Hendrick, S., & Hendrick, C. (1995). Gender and sexual standards in dating relationships. Personal Relationships, 2, 359-369.
4. Buss, D. M. (1985). Human mate selection. American Scientist, 73, 47-51.
5. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypothesis. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
6. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
7. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. Christopher, F. S., & Cate, R. M. (1984). Factors involved in premarital sexual decision-making. The Journal of Sex Research, 20, 363-376.
9. Christopher, F. S., & Cate, R. M. (1985). Premarital sexual pathways and relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 271-288.
10. Christopher, F. S., & Roosa, M. W. (1991). Factors affecting sexual decisions in the premarital relationships of adolescents and young adults. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 111-133). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. D'Augelli, J. F. & D'Augelli, A. R. (1977). Moral reasoning and premarital sexual behavior: Toward reasoning about relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 46-66.
12. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Gagnon, J. H. (1973). Scripts and the coordination of sexual conduct. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 27-59). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
14. Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1987). The sexual scripting of oral genital contacts. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 1-25.
15. Hatfield, E., Sprecher, S., Pillemer, J. T., & Greenberger, D. (1988). Gender differences in what is desired in the sexual relationship. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 1(2), 39-52.
16. Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392-402.
17. Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1989). Research on love: Does it measure up? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 784-794.
18. Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1991). Dimensions of love: A sociobiological interpretation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10, 206-230.
19. Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S. S., Foote, F. H., & Slapion-Foote, M. J. (1984). Do men and women love differently? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 177-195.
20. Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1987a). Love and sexual attitudes, self-disclosure, and sensation-seeking. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 281-297.
21. Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1987b). Multidimensionality of sexual attitudes. The Journal of Sex Research, 23, 502-526.
22. Hendrick, S. S., Hendrick, C., Slapion-Foote, M. J., & Foote, F. H. (1985). Gender differences in sexual attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1630-1642.
23. Hinde, R. A. (1984). Why do the sexes behave differently in close relationships? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 471-501.
24. Klayman, J. S. (1994). Sexual involvement: The match between scenes and scripts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
25. LaPlante, M. N., McCormick, N., & Brannigan, G. G. (1980). Living the sexual script: College students' views of influence in sexual encounters. The Journal of Sex Research, 16, 338-355.
26. Lee, J. A. (1973). The colours of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. Don Mills, Ontario: New Press.
27. Lee, J. A. (1977). A typology of styles of loving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 173-182.
28. Leiblum, S. R., & Rosen, R. C. (1991). Couples therapy for erectile disorders: Conceptual and clinical considerations. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 17, 147-159.
29. Levy, M. B., & Davis, K. E. (1988). Lovestyles and attachment styles compared: Their relations to each other and to various relationship characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 439-471.
30. Maticka-Tyndale, E. (1991). Sexual scripts and AIDS prevention: Variations in adherence to safer-sex guidelines by heterosexual adolescents. The Journal of Sex Research, 28, 45-66.
31. Mellen, S. L. W. (1981). The evolution of love. San Francisco: Freeman.
32. Morrow, G. D., Clark, E. M., & Brock, K. F. (1995). Individual and partner love styles: Implications for the quality of romantic involvements. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 363-387.
33. Mosher, D. L. (1980). Three dimensions of depth of involvement in human sexual response. The Journal of Sex Research, 16, 1-42.
34. Mosher, D. L. (1988). Sexual path preferences inventory. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Sexuality-related measures: A compendium (pp. 188-192). Lake Mills, IA: Graphic Publications.
35. Mosher, D. L., & Maclan, P. (1994). College men and women respond to X-rated videos intended for male or female audiences: Gender and sexual scripts. The Journal of Sex Research, 31, 99-113.
36. Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29-51.
37. O'Sullivan, L. F., & Byers, E. S. (1992). College students' incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions. The Journal of Sex Research, 29, 435-446.
38. Reis, I. L. (1990). An end to shame: Shaping our next sexual revolution. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
39. Simon, W. (1973). The social, the erotic, and the sensual: The complexities of sexual scripts. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 61-82). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
40. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97-120.
41. Sirken, M. I. (1985). Sexual involvement theory, sexual trance, and hypnotizability: The experimental use of guided imagery. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
42. Snyder, M., Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. (1986). Personality and sexual relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 181-190.
43. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119-135.
44. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Tomkins, S. S. (1987). Script theory. In J. Aronoff, A. J. Rubin, & R. A. Zucker (Eds.), The emergence of personality. New York: Springer Publishing.
46. Vance, E. B., & Wagner, N. N. (1976). Written descriptions of orgasm: A study of sex differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 5, 87-98.