A code reuse interface for non-programmer middle school students

International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 219-228

  Gross, Paul A ^a   Herstand, Micah S ^a   Hodges, Jordana W ^b   Kelleher, Caitlin L ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Code reuse; End user; Looking glass; Middle school; Non programmer; Storytelling alice

Indexed keywords

ACTIONSCRIPT; CODE REUSE; END USER; END USERS; EXPLORATORY STUDIES; MIDDLE SCHOOL; MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS; PROGRAMMING EXPERIENCE;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; GLASS; STUDENTS; USER INTERFACES;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY;

EID: 77951128136     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1719970.1720001     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Brandt, J., Dontcheva, M., Weskamp, M., and Klemmer, S.R. Example-Centric Programming: Integrating Web Search into the Development Environment. Stanford University Technical Report, CSTR-2009-2101
2. Bruckman, A. MOOSE Crossing: Construction, Community, and Learning in a Networked Virtual World for Kids. MIT Media Lab. Boston, MA., 1997.
3. Cottrell, R., Chang, J., Walker, R.J., and Denzinger, J. Determining detailed structural correspondence for generalization tasks. Proc. SIGSOFT, (2007), 165-174.
4. Cottrell, R., Walker, R.J., and Denzinger, J. Semiautomating small-scale source code reuse via structural correspondence. Proc. SIGSOFT (2008), 214-225.
5. Duala-Ekoko, E. and Robillard, M.P. Tracking Code Clones in Evolving Software. Proc. ICSE (2007), 158-167.
6. Fischer, G., Henninger, S., and Redmiles, D. Cognitive tools for locating and comprehending software objects for reuse. Proc. ICSE (1991), 318-328.
7. Gill, J. Shedding Some New Light on Old Truths: Student Attitudes to School in Terms of Year Level and Gender. Proc. of the American Educational Research Association. (1994).
8. Goldman, M. and Miller, R. Codetrail: Connecting source code and web resources. Proc. VL/HCC (2008), 65-72.
9. Gross, P. and Kelleher, C. Non-programmers Identifying Functionality in Unfamiliar Code: Strategies and Barriers. Proc. VL/HCC (2009), 75-82.
10. Hartmann, B., Wu, L., Collins, K., and Klemmer, S.R. Programming by a sample: rapidly creating web applications with d.mix. Proc. UIST, ACM (2007), 241-250.
11. Hoffmann, R., Fogarty, J., and Weld, D.S. Assieme: finding and leveraging implicit references in a web search interface for programmers. Proc. UIST, ACM (2007), 13-22.
12. Holmes, R., Walker, R., and Murphy, G. Approximate Structural Context Matching: An Approach to Recommend Relevant Examples. IEEE Trans. On Soft. Eng. (2006), 952-970.
13. Holmes, R., Cottrell, R., Walker, R.J., and Denzinger, J. The End-to-End Use of Source Code Examples: An Exploratory Study. Proc. ICSM, (2009), to appear.
14. Holmes, R., Walker, R.J., and Murphy, G.C. Strathcona example recommendation tool. Proc. ESEC/FSE, ACM (2005), 237-240.
15. Jablonski, P. and Hou, D. CReN: a tool for tracking copy-and-paste code clones and renaming identifiers consistently in the IDE. Proc. OOPSLA, ACM (2007), 16-20.
16. Kelleher, C. and Pausch, R. Lowering the barriers to programming: A taxonomy of programming environments and languages for novice programmers. ACM Comput. Surv. 37, 2 (2005), 83-137.
17. Kelleher, C. and Pausch, R. Using storytelling to motivate programming. Comm. of ACM 50, 7 (2007), 58-64.
18. Kelleher, C., Pausch, R., and Kiesler, S. Storytelling alice motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. Proc. CHI, ACM (2007), 1455-1464.
19. Ko, A.J. and Myers, B.A. Designing the whyline: a debugging interface for asking questions about program behavior Proc. CHI, ACM (2004), 151-158.
20. Krueger, C.W. Software reuse. ACM Comput. Surv. 24, 2 (1992), 131-183.
21. Lanza, M. CodeCrawler-lessons learned in building a software visualization tool. Proc. CSMR, (2003), 409-418.
22. Leshed, G., Haber, E.M., Matthews, T., and Lau, T. CoScripter: automating & sharing how-to knowledge in the enterprise. Proc. CHI, ACM (2008), 1719-1728.
23. Lucredio, D., Prado, A., and de Almeida, E. A survey on software components search and retrieval. Proc. Euromicro Conference (2004), 152-159.
24. Lukoit, K., Wilde, N., Stowell, S., and Hennessey, T. TraceGraph: immediate visual location of software features. Proc. ICSM, (2000), 33-39.
25. Maloney, J., Burd, L., Kafai, Y., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., and Resnick, M. Scratch: a sneak preview [education]. Proc. C5 (2004), 104-109.
26. Mili, H., Mili, F., and Mili, A. Reusing software: issues and research directions. Software Engineering, IEEE Trans. on Soft. Eng. 21, 6 (1995), 528-562.
27. Mili, A., Mili, R., and Mittermeir, R. A survey of software reuse libraries. Annals of Soft. Eng. 5, 1 (1998), 349-414.
28. Olney, S. and Myers, B. FireCrystal: Understanding Interactive Behaviors in Dynamic Web Pages. Proc. VL/HCC, (2009), 105-108.
29. Prieto-Diaz, R. Status report: software reusability. IEEE Software 10, 3 (1993), 61-66.
30. Ruthruff, J., Creswick, E., Burnett, M., et al. End-user software visualizations for fault localization. Proc. SoftVis, ACM (2003), 123-132.
31. Sahavechaphan, N. and Claypool, K. XSnippet: mining for sample code. SIGPLAN Not. 41, 10 (2006), 413-430.
32. Schafer, T., Eichberg, M., Haupt, M., and Mezini, M. The SEXTANT Software Exploration Tool. IEEE Trans. on Soft. Eng. 32, 9 (2006), 753-768.
33. Storey, M. and Muller, H. Manipulating and documenting software structures using SHriMP views. Proc. ICSM, (1995), 275-284.
34. Thummalapenta, S. and Xie, T. Parseweb: a programmer assistant for reusing open source code on the web. Proc. ASE, ACM (2007), 204-213.
35. Yongbeom, Kim and Stohr, E.A. Software Reuse: Survey and Research Directions. Journal of Management Info. Sys. 14, 4 (1998), 113-147.
36. Zimmer, L. and Bennett, S. Gender differences on the California statewide assessment of attitudes and achievement in science. Proc. of the American Educational Research Association, (1987).
37. Zweben, S. 2007-2008 Taulbee Survey. Computing Research News 21, 3 (2009), 8-23.