Envision: The effectiveness of a dual-level professional development model for changing teacher practice

Environmental Education Research

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 471-492

  Shepardson, Daniel P ^a   Harbor, Jon ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951120330     PISSN: 13504622     EISSN: 14695871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1350462042000291010     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ballantyne, RR, and Packer, JM. 1996. Teaching and learning in environmental education: developing environmental conceptions, Journal of Environmental Education, 27(2): 25–32.
2. Bell C, 2002 Determining the effects of a professional development program on teachers' inquiry knowledge and classroom action: a case study of a professional development strategy Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Purdue University
3. Bishop, A. 1985. The social construction of meaning—a significant development in mathematics education?, For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1): 24–28.
4. Brooks J, Brooks M, 1993 The case for constructivist classrooms (Alexandria, VA, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development)
5. Bybee RW, 1993 Reforming science education: social perspectives and personal reflections (New York, Teacher's College Press)
6. Bybee RW, 2000 Teaching science as inquiry in: Minstrell J, van Zee EH, (Eds) Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (Washington, DC, American Association for the Advancement of Science) 20 26
7. Cobb P, 1990 Multiple perspectives in: Steffe LP, Wood T, (Eds) Transforming children's mathematics education: international perspectives (Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) 200 215
8. Dresner, M. 2002. Teachers in the woods: monitoring forest biodiversity, The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(1): 26–31.
9. Driver, R, and Bell, BF. 1986. Students' thinking and the learning of science: a constructivist view, School Science Review, 67: 443–456.
10. Garet, MS, Porter, AC, Desimone, L, Birman, BF, and Suk Yoon, K. 2001. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers, American Educational Research Journal, 38(4): 915–945.
11. Joyce, BR, and Showers, B. 1981. Transfer of training: the contribution of ‘coaching’, Journal of Education, 163(2): 163–172.
12. Joyce BR, Showers B, 1983 Power in staff development through research on training (Alexandria, VA, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development)
13. Joyce B, Showers B, 1988 Student achievement through staff development (White Plains, NY, Longman)
14. Layman JW, Ochoa G, Heikkinen H, 1996 Inquiry and learning (New York, The College Entrance Examination Board)
15. Loucks-Horsley S, Hewson PW, Love N, Stiles KE, 1998 Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press, Inc.)
16. Luft, JA. 1999. Assessing science teachers as they implement inquiry lessons: the extended inquiry observational rubric, Science Educator: The National Science Education Leadership Association Journal, 8(1): 9–18.
17. National Research Council 1996 National science education standards (Washington, DC, National Academy Press)
18. National Research Council 2000 Inquiry and the national science education standards: a guide for teaching and learning (Washington, DC, National Academy Press)
19. Patton MQ, 1990 Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd edn), (Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications, Inc.)
20. Piaget J, 1970 Genetic epistemology (New York, Columbia Press)
21. Rakow SJ, 1998 Teaching science as inquiry Fastback 246, (Bloomington, IN, Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation)
22. Radford DL, Ramsey LL, 1996, March Experiencing scientific inquiry and pedagogy: a model or inservice training science education reform paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED394820)
23. Rogoff B, 1990 Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
24. Roth KJ, 1990 Developing meaningful conceptual understanding in science in: Jones BF, Idol L, (Eds) Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum) 139 176
25. Schwandt TA, 1994 Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry in: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, (Eds) Handbook of qualitative research (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications) 118 137
26. Shepardson, DP. 1999. Learning science in a first grade science activity: a Vygotskian perspective, Science Education, 83: 621–638.
27. Shymansky, JE, Kyle, WC, and Alport, JM. 1983. The effects of new science curricula on student performance, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24: 61–76.
28. Showers, B, Joyce, B, and Bennett, B. 1987. Synthesis of research on staff development: a framework for future study and a state-of-the-art analysis, Educational Leadership, 45(3): 77–87.
29. Shulman, LS. 1986. Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching, Educational Researcher, 15(2): 4–14.
30. Sparks D, Hirsh S, 1997 A new vision for staff development. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Alexandria, Virginia, (Oxford, OH, National Staff Development Council)
31. Tafoya, E, Sunal, D, and Knecht, P. 1980. Assessing inquiry potential: a tool for curriculum decision makers, School Science & Mathematics, 80(1): 43–48.
32. Vygotsky LS, 1986 Thought and language Kozulin A, Ed., (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press)