Accept or Reject?

Journal of Pediatric Health Care

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 141-142

  Martin, Sarah A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

biomedical publications; Nursing; peer review

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NURSING; NURSING RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STANDARD;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; NURSING; NURSING RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING;

EID: 77951102528     PISSN: 08915245     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2010.01.004     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Baggs, J. G., Broome, M. E., Dougherty, M. C., Freda, M. C., & Kearney, M. H. (2008). Blinding in peer review: The preferences of reviewers for nursing journals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 4, 131-138.
2. Broome, M. E., Dougherty, M., Kearney, M., Freda, M., & Baggs, J. (2009, September). Ethical concerns of nursing journal reviewers: An international survey. Paper presented at the Sixth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Abstract retrieved from http://www.ama-assn.org/public/peer/abstracts_2009.html
3. Kearney M.H., Baggs J.G., Broome M.E., Dougherty M.C., and Freda M.C. Experience, time investment, and motivators of nursing journal peer reviewers. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 40 (2008) 395-400
4. Peer review. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster's online dictionary (11th ed.). Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/peer review
5. Ware, M. & Monkman, M. (2008). Publishing Research Consortium. Peer review: Benefits, perceptions, and alternatives. Retrieved from http://www.publishingresearch.net/PeerReview.htm