Examining the impact of audio presentation on tests of reading comprehension

Applied Measurement in Education

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 153-167

  Laitusis, Cara Cahalan ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951047843     PISSN: 08957347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08957341003673815     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Carver, R. P. (2003). The highly lawful relationship among pseudoword decoding, word identification, spelling, listening, and reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(2), 105-126.
2. Carver, R. P., & David, A. H. (2001). Investigating reading achievement using a causal model. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(2), 107-140.
3. Clapper, A. T., Morse, A. B., Lazarus, S. S., Thompson, S. J., & Thurlow, M. L. (2005). 2003 state policies on assessment participation and accommodations for students with disabilities (Synthesis Rep. No. 56). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
4. Crawford, L., & Tindal, G. (2004). Effects of a read-aloud modification on a standardized reading test. Exceptionality, 12(2), 89-106.
5. Elliott, S. N., & McKevitt, B. (2000, April). Testing accommodations decisions: Legal and technical issues challenging educators. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
6. Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Boudousquie, A., Copeland, K., Young, V., Kalinowski, S., et al. (2006). Effects of accommodations on high stakes testing for students with reading disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(2), 136-150.
7. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Fair and unfair testing accommodations. School Administrator, 56, 24-29.
8. Gough, P. B., & Walsh, M. A. (1991). Chinese, Phoenicians, and the orthographic cipher of English. In S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 199-210). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Koenig, J. A., & Bachman, L.F. (2004). Keeping score for all: The effects of inclusion and accommodation policies on large-scale educational assess. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
10. Kosciolek, S., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2000). Effects of a reading accommodation on the validity of a reading test (Technical Rep. No. 28). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
11. Laitusis, C. C. (2008). State reading assessments and inclusion of students with dyslexia. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 34(4), 31-33.
12. Laitusis, C. C., Cook, L. L., Cline, F., King, T., & Sabatini, J. (2008). Examining the impact of audio presentation on tests of reading comprehension. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
13. MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000b). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests, Fourth Edition (Technical Rep. for Forms S & T.) Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
14. Mather, N., Hammill, D. D., Allen, E. A., & Roberts, R. (2004). TOSWRF: Test of Silent Word Reading Fluency: Examiner's manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
15. McKevitt, B. C., & Elliott, S. N. (2003). Effects of perceived consequences of using read-aloud and teacher-recommended testing accommodation on a reading achievement test. School Psychology Review, 23(4), 583-600.
16. Meloy, L. L., Deville, C., & Frisbie, D. A. (2002). The effect of a read-aloud accommodation on test scores of students with and without a learning disability in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 23(4), 248-255.
17. Pitoniak, M. J., & Royer, J. M. (2001). Testing accommodations for examinees with disabilities: A review of psychometric, legal, and social policy issues. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 53-104.
18. Shrank, F. A., Mather, N., & Woodcock, R. W. (2004). Comprehensive manual: Woodcock-Johnson III Diagnostic Reading Battery. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
19. Sireci, S. G., Scarpati, S. E., & Li, S. (2005). Test accommodations for students with disabilities: An analysis of the interaction hypothesis. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 457-490.
20. Thurlow, M., & Wiener, D. (2000). Non-approved accommodations: Recommendations for use and reporting (Policy Directions No. 11). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
21. Woodcock, R., Mather, N., & Schrank, F. A. (2004). Woodcock-Johnson III: Diagnostic Reading Battery. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.