A comparison of the validity and reliability of established bone stock loss classification systems and the proposal of a novel classification system

HIP International

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 50-55

  Parry, Michael C ^a   Whitehouse, Michael R ^a   Mehendale, Sanchit A ^a   Smith, Lindsay K ^b   Webb, Jason C ^a   Spencer, Robert F ^b   Blom, Ashley W ^a  

^a SOUTHMEAD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b WESTON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Classification; Hip arthroplasty; Revision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RELIABILITY; REOPERATION; SURGEON; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VALIDITY;

EID: 77950994052     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112070001002000108     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. National Joint Registry UK. Available at http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/ njrcentre. Accessed October 17, 2008.
2. Mallory TH. Preparation of the proximal femur in cementless total hip revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 235: 47-60.
3. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Harris WH, Poss R, Muller ME, Sledge CB. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement: a standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72: 161-168 (Pubitemid 20123684)
4. D'Antonio J, Capello WN, Borden LS, et al. Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 243: 126-137 (Pubitemid 19165374)
5. Garbuz D, Morsi E, Mohammed N, Gross AE. Classification and reconstruction in revision acetabular arthroplasty with bone stock deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 323: 98-107. (Pubitemid 26071755)
6. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: a 6 year follow-up and evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9: 33-44.
7. Rubash HR, Sinha RK, Paprosky W, Engh CA, Maloney WJ. A new classification system for the management of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. AAOS Instr Course Lect 1999; 48: 37-42.
8. Engh CA, Glassman AH. Cementless revision of failed total hip replacement: An update. AAOS Instr Course Lect 1991; 40: 189-197
9. Gross AE, Allan DG, Lavoie GJ, Oakeshott RD. Revision arthroplasty of the proximal femur using allograft bone. Orthop Clinic North Am 1993; 24: 705-715
10. D'Antonio J, McCarthy JC, Bargar WL, et al. Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 296: 133-139 (Pubitemid 23332131)
11. Paprosky WG, Lawrence JM, Cameron HU. Femoral defect classification: Clinical application. Orthop Rev 1990; 19: 9.
12. Engelbrecht E, Heinert K. Klassification und Behandlungsrichtlinien von Knochensubstanzverlusten bei Revisionsoperationen am Huftgelenkmittelfristige Ergebnisse. Primare und Revisionsalloarthroplastik Hrsg-Endo-Klinik. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1987.
13. Campbell DG, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Reliability of acetabular bone defect classification systems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthoplasty 2001; 16: 83-86 (Pubitemid 32097233)
14. Gozzard C, Blom A, Taylor A, Smith E, Learmonth I. A comparison of the reliability and validity of bone stock loss classification systems used for revision hip surgery. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 638-642 (Pubitemid 37040361)
15. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174
16. Haddad F, Masri B, Garbuz D, Duncan C. Femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: Classification and preoperative planning. AAOS Instr Course Lect 2000; 49: 83-96.
17. Saleh K, Holtzman J, Gafni A, et al. Reliability and intraoperative validity of preoperative assessment of standardised plain radiographs in predicting bone loss at revision hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 1040-1046 (Pubitemid 32662106)