Caudal block anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy

International Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 19-22

  Ikuerowo, S O ^a   Popoola, A A ^b   Olapade Olaopa, E O ^b   Okeke, L I ^b   Shittu, O B ^b   Adebayo, S A ^b   Sanusi, A A ^c  

^a LAGOS STATE UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL   (Nigeria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN   (Nigeria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN   (Nigeria)

Author keywords

Caudal anesthesia; Transrectal prostate biopsy

Indexed keywords

LIDOCAINE;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA LEVEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIZZINESS; DRUG EFFICACY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERINEUM; PROSTATE BIOPSY; TRANSRECTAL PROSTATE BIOPSY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

AGED; ANESTHESIA, CAUDAL; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE; RECTUM;

EID: 77950883823     PISSN: 03011623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-006-9095-4     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Crundwell 1999 Patients' tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy: an audit of 104 cases BJU Int 83 7 792 795 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00011.x 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ps12jtQ%3D%3D 10368198 (Pubitemid 29224398)
2. H Seymour, et al. 2001 Pain after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: the advantages of periprostatic local anesthesia BJU Int 88 6 540 544 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.02324.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrntVKntg%3D%3D 11678747 (Pubitemid 34293794)
3. Catalona WJ, Scott WW (2002) Biopsy of the prostate. In: Walsh PC, Gittes RF, Perlmutter AD, Stammey TA (eds) Campbell's urology, 8th edn. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 1477-1479
4. F Desgrandchamps, et al. 1999 The rectal administration of lidocaine gel and tolerance of transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate: A prospective randomized placebo-controlled study BJU Int 83 9 1007 1009 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00080.x 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ps1Oqtg%3D%3D 10368245 (Pubitemid 29271869)
5. JL Peters, et al. 2001 Increased patient satisfaction from transrectal ultrasonography and biopsy under sedation BJU Int 87 9 827 830 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02221.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzkvFaisw%3D%3D 11412220 (Pubitemid 34204323)
6. CA Adebamowo 2000 Caudal anesthesia in the clinical assessment of painful anal lesions Afr J Med Med Sci 29 2 133 134 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3psVCmsQ%3D%3D 11379444
7. CA Adebamowo JK Ladipo OG Ajao 1996 Randomized comparison of agents for caudal anesthesia in anal surgery Br J Surg 83 3 364 365 10.1002/bjs.1800830321 1:STN:280:DyaK283ks1alsA%3D%3D 8665193 (Pubitemid 26083171)
8. LI Okeke 2002 Experience with caudal block regional anesthesia for transurethral resection of the prostate gland West Afr J Med 21 4 280 281 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7kvVygsA%3D%3D 12665263
9. SJ Zito 1993 Adult caudal anesthesia: A reexamination of the technique Aana J 61 2 153 157 1:STN:280:DyaK3szpt1Gqug%3D%3D 8379276
10. Owen H, Cousins MJ (1989) Subarachnoid and extradural anesthesia. In: Nimmo WS, Smith G (eds) Anesthesia. Blackwell scientific publications, Oxford, pp 1034-1070
11. ST Verghese, et al. 2002 Testing anal sphincter tone predicts the effectiveness of caudal analgesia in children Anesth Analg 94 5 1161 1164 10.1097/00000539-200205000-00019 11973180 table of contents