Randomized comparison of agents for caudal anaesthesia in anal surgery

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 364-365

  Adebamowo, C A ^a   Ladipo, J K ^a   Ajao, O G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN   (Nigeria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; DIAZEPAM; LIDOCAINE;

ADULT; ANUS SURGERY; ARTICLE; CAUDAL ANESTHESIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFICACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, CAUDAL; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; ANUS DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIDOCAINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 0029989685     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800830321     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Owen H, Cousins MJ. Subarachnoid and extradural anaesthesia. In: Nimmo WS, Smith G eds. Anaesthesia. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1989: 1034-70.
2. Dalens B, Hasnaoui A. Caudal anesthesia in pediatric surgery: success rate and adverse effects in 750 consecutive patients. Anesth Analg 1989; 68: 83-9.
3. Norenberg A, Johanson DC, Gravenstein JS. Racial differences in sacral structure important in caudal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1979; 50: 549-51.