Axial stent strut angle influences wall shear stress after stent implantation: Analysis using 3D computational fluid dynamics models of stent foreshortening

BioMedical Engineering Online

Volumn 4, Issue , 2005, Pages

  LaDisa Jr , John F ^a,b,d   Olson, Lars E ^d   Hettrick, Douglas A ^b,d   Warltier, David C ^b,c,d   Kersten, Judy R ^b   Pagel, Paul S ^b,d  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLEMENT J ZABLOCKI VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^d Marquette University   (United States)

Author keywords

Atherosclerosis; CFD; Neointimal hyperplasia; Restenosis; Stent geometry

Indexed keywords

ATHEROSCLEROSIS; BLOOD FLOW; NEOINTIMAL HYPERPLASIA; RESTENOSIS; STENT GEOMETRY; STENT IMPLANTATION; VASCULAR STENTS;

BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESES; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; HEMODYNAMICS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SHEAR STRESS;

BIOMATERIALS;

ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTERY INTIMA PROLIFERATION; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY STENT; GEOMETRY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HYPOTHESIS; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESTENOSIS; SHEAR STRESS; SIMULATION; SURGICAL RISK; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ANIMAL; ARTERY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SHEAR STRENGTH; STENT; SURGERY;

ANIMALS; ARTERIES; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; ELASTICITY; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SHEAR STRENGTH; STENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 27744458817     PISSN: 1475925X     EISSN: 1475925X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-4-59     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bennett MR and O'Sullivan M. Mechanisms of angioplasty and stent restenosis: implications for design of rational therapy. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2001, 91: 149-166.
2. Choussat R, Black AJ, Bossi I, Joseph T, Fajadet J, and Marco J. Long-term clinical outcome after endoluminal reconstruction of diffusely degenerated saphenous vein grafts with less-shortening wallstents. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2000, 36: 387-394.
3. Danenberg HD, Welt FG, Walker M, Seifert P, Toegel GS, and Edelman ER. Systemic inflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide increases neointimal formation after balloon and stent injury in rabbits. Circulation 2002, 105: 2917-2922.
4. DePaola N, Gimbrone MA, Jr., Davies PF, and Dewey CF. Vascular endothelium responds to fluid shear stress gradients. Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis 1992, 12: 1254-1257.
5. Duda SH, Wiskirchen J, Tepe G, Bitzer M, Kaulich TW, Stoeckel D, and Claussen CD. Physical properties of endovascular stents: an experimental comparison. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 2000, 11: 645-654.
6. Ebeid MR. Balloon expandable stents for coarctation of the aorta: review of current status and technical considerations. Images in Pediatric Cardiology 2003, 15: 25-41.
7. Farb A, Weber DK, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, and Virmani R. Morphological predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting in humans. Circulation 2002, 105: 2974-2980.
8. Finn AV, Palacios IF, Kastrati A, and Gold HK. Drug-eluting stents for diabetes mellitus: a rush to judgment? J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 45: 479-483.
9. Finol EA and Amon CH. Blood flow in abdominal aortic aneurysms: pulsatile flow hemodynamics. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2001, 123: 474-484.
10. Fox RW and McDonald AT. Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. (4 ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1992, p. 322.
11. Garasic JM, Edelman ER, Squire JC, Seifert P, Williams MS, and Rogers C. Stent and artery geometry determine intimal thickening independent of arterial injury. Circulation 2000, 101: 812-818.
12. Hamuro M, Palmaz JC, Sprague EA, Fuss C, and Luo J. Influence of stent edge angle on endothelialization in an in vitro model. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 2001, 12: 607-611.
13. Kalmar G, Hubner F, Voelker W, Hutzenlaub J, Teubner J, Poerner T, Suselbeck T, Borggrefe M, and Haase KK. Radial force and wall apposition of balloon-expandable vascular stents in eccentric stenoses: an in vitro evaluation in a curved vessel model. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 2002, 13: 499-508.
14. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Dirschinger J, Pache J, Ulm K, Schuhlen H, Seyfarth M, Schmitt C, Blasini R, Neumann FJ, and Schomig A. Restenosis after coronary placement of various stent types. American Journal of Cardiology 2001, 87: 34-39.
15. Kleinstreuer C, Hyun S, Buchanan JR, Longest PW, Archie JP, and Truskey GA. Hemodynamic parameters and early intimal thickening in branching blood vessels. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 2001, 29: 1-64.
16. Kreutzer J and Rome JJ. Open-cell design stents in congenital heart disease: a comparison of IntraStent vs. Palmaz stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002, 56: 400-409.
17. Ku DN. Blood flow in arteries. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 1997, 29: 399-434.
18. Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK, and Glagov S. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis 1985, 5: 293-302.
19. Kute SM and Vorp DA. The effect of proximal artery flow on the hemodynamics at the distal anastomosis of a vascular bypass graft: computational study. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2001, 123: 277-283.
20. LaDisa JF, Jr., Guler I, Olson LE, Hettrick DA, Kersten JR, Warltier DC, and Pagel PS. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics modeling of alterations in coronary wall shear stress produced by stent implantation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2003, 31: 972-980.
21. LaDisa JF, Jr., Hettrick DA, Olson LE, Guler I, Gross ER, Kress TT, Kersten JR, Warltier DC, and Pagel PS. Coronary stent implantation alters coronary artery hemodynamics and wall shear stress during maximal vasodilation. Journal of Applied Physiology 2002, 93: 1939-1946.
22. LaDisa JF, Jr., Meier HT, Olson LE, Kersten JR, Warltier DC, and Pagel PS. Antegrade iliac artery stent implantation for the temporal and spatial examination of stent-induced neointimal hyperplasia and alterations in regional fluid dynamics. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods 2005, 51: 115-121.
23. LaDisa JF, Jr., Olson LE, Guler I, Hettrick DA, Audi SH, Kersten JR, Warltier DC, and Pagel PS. Stent design properties and deployment ratio influence indexes of wall shear stress: a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics investigation within a normal artery. Journal of Applied Physiology 2004, 97: 424-430.
24. LaDisa JF, Jr., Olson LE, Guler I, Hettrick DA, Kersten JR, Warltier DC, and Pagel PS. Circumferential vascular deformation after stent implantation alters wall shear stress evaluated using time-dependent 3D computational fluid dynamics models. Journal of Applied Physiology 2005, 98: 947-957.
25. LaDisa JF, Jr., Olson LE, Molthen RC, Hettrick DA, Pratt PF, Hardel MD, Kersten JR, Warltier DC, and Pagel PS. Alterations in wall shear stress predict sites of neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation in rabbit iliac arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005, 288: H2465-2475.
26. LaDisa JF, Jr., Olson LE, Ropella KM, Molthen RC, Haworth ST, Kersten JR, Warltier DC, and Pagel PS. Microfocal x-ray computed tomography post-processing operations for optimizing reconstruction volumes of stented arteries during 3D computational fluid dynamics modeling. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2005, 79: 121-134.
27. Lei M, Kleinstreuer C, and Archie JP, Jr. Geometric design improvements for femoral graft-artery junctions mitigating restenosis. Journal of Biomechanics 1996, 29: 1605-1614.
28. Lei M, Kleinstreuer C, and Truskey GA. A focal stress gradient-dependent mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis in branching arteries. Medical Engineering Physics 1996, 18: 326-332.
29. Murata T, Hiro T, Fujii T, Yasumoto K, Murashige A, Kohno M, Yamada J, Miura T, and Matsuzaki M. Impact of the cross-sectional geometry of the post-deployment coronary stent on in-stent neointimal hyperplasia: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation Journal 2002, 66: 489-493.
30. Myers JG, Moore JA, Ojha M, Johnston KW, and Ethier CR. Factors influencing blood flow patterns in the human right coronary artery. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2001, 29: 109-120.
31. Newman VS, Berry JL, Routh WD, Ferrario CM, and Dean RH. Effects of vascular stent surface area and hemodynamics on intimal thickening. Journal of Vascular & Interventional Radiology 1996, 7: 387-393.
32. Ojha M. Spatial and temporal variations of wall shear stress within an end-to-side arterial anastomosis model. Journal of Biomechanics 1993, 26: 1377-1388.
33. Palmaz JC. Intravascular stents in the last and the next 10 years. J Endovasc Ther 2004, Suppl 2: II200-206.
34. Perktold K and Rappitsch G. Computer simulation of local blood flow and vessel mechanics in a compliant carotid artery bifurcation model. Journal of Biomechanics 1995, 28: 845-856.
35. Rogers C and Edelman ER. Endovascular stent design dictates experimental restenosis and thrombosis. Circulation 1995, 91: 2995-3001.
36. Roguin A and Beyar R. beStent - the serpentine balloon expandable stent: review of mechanical properties and clinical experience. Artificial Organs 1998, 22: 243-249.
37. Schulz C, Herrmann RA, Beilharz C, Pasquantonio J, and Alt E. Coronary stent symmetry and vascular injury determine experimental restenosis. Heart 2000, 83: 462-467.
38. Tada S and Tarbell JM. Flow through internal elastic lamina affects shear stress on smooth muscle cells (3D simulations). American Journal of Physiology 2002, 282: H576-584.
39. Tardy Y, Resnick N, Nagel T, Gimbrone MA, and Dewey CF. Shear stress gradients remodel endothelial monolayers in vitro via a cell proliferation-migration-loss cycle. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 1997, 17: 3102-3106.
40. Verstandig AG, Bloom Al, Sasson T, Haviv YS, and Rubinger D. Shortening and migration of Wallstents after stenting of central venous stenoses in hemodialysis patients. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology 2003, 26: 58-64.
41. Virmani R, Farb A, Guagliumi G, and Kolodgie FD. Drug-eluting stents: caution and concerns for long-term outcome. Coronary Artery Disease 2004, 15: 313-318.
42. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Farb A, and Lafont A. Drug eluting stents: are human and animal studies comparable? Heart 2003, 89: 133-138.
43. Wentzel JJ, Whelan DM, van der Giessen WJ, van Beusekom HM, Andhyiswara I, Serruys PW, Slager CJ, and Krams R. Coronary stent implantation changes 3-D vessel geometry and 3-D shear stress distribution. Journal of Biomechanics 2000, 33: 1287-1295.
44. Yoshitomi Y, Kojima S, Yano M, Sugi T, Matsumoto Y, Saotome M, Tanaka K, Endo M, and Kuramochi M. Does stent design affect probability of restenosis? A randomized trial comparing Multilink stents with GFX stents. American Heart Journal 2001, 142: 445-451.