Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in daily clinical practice: A multi center study in Spain;Utilidad de la ecografía con contraste en la práctica clínica diaria. Estudio multicéntrico español CEUS

Radiologia

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 144-152

  Nicolau Molina, C ^a   Fontanilla Echeveste, T ^b   Del Cura RodrigueZ J L ^c   Cruz Villalon F ^d   Ripolles GonzaleZ T ^e   Baudet NaveroS , B ^f   Velasco MarcoS , M J ^g   Garre SancheZ C ^h   Huertas ArroyO , R ⁱ   Hernandez Garcia L ^j   Pitti ReyeS , S J ^k   Gomez RodrigueZ R A ^l   Calvo LopeZ M J ^m   Maroto Genover, A ⁿ   Alvarez BustoS G ^o   Poch Zatarain, M ^p   Talegon MelendeZ Y A ^q  

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNIC   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO PUERTA DE HIERRO   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL DE BASURTO   (Spain)

^d HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO REINA SOFÍA   (Spain)

^e HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DR PESET   (Spain)

^f Hospital Ntra Sra C and Elaria   (Spain)

^g HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO RÍO HORTEGA   (Spain)

^h Hospital Virgendela Arrixaca   (Spain)

ⁱ General Hospital De la Mancha Centro   (Spain)

^j HOSPITAL DE LEÓN   (Spain)

^k HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE CANARIAS   (Spain)

^l Servicio de Digestivo   (Spain)

^m HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO PUERTA DEL MAR   (Spain)

ⁿ HOSPITAL JOSEP TRUETA   (Spain)

^o HOSPITAL REGIONAL UNIVERSITARIO DE MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^p HOSPITAL DONOSTIA   (Spain)

^q HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO VIRGEN DEL ROCÍO   (Spain)

more..

Author keywords

Contrast agentS.; Contrast enhanced ultrasonography; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; SONOVUE; CONTRAST AGENT BR1; PHOSPHOLIPID; POLYSACCHARIDE; SHU 508; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE;

ABDOMEN; ARTICLE; BOLUS INJECTION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INFUSION; KIDNEY; LIVER; MULTICENTER STUDY; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; SPAIN; SPLEEN; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DIAGNOSTIC USE; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; POLYSACCHARIDES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPAIN; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77950859435     PISSN: 00338338     EISSN: 15781771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2009.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Rumack C M, Wilson S, Charboneau S W. Diagnósticoecográ fico. 3 ed. Madrid: Elsevier; 2006.
2. Gaiani S, Volpe L, Piscaglia F, Bolondi L. Vascularity of liver tumours and recent advances in Doppler ultrasound. J Hepatology. 2001; 34:474-482 (Pubitemid 32240830)
3. Kumada T, Nakano S, Toyoda H, Hayashi K, Kiriyama S, Sone Y, et al. Assessment of tumorhemodynamics in smallhepatocel-lular carcinoma: Comparison of Dopplerultrasonography, angiography-assisted computed tomography, and pathological findings. Liver Int. 2004; 24:425-431 (Pubitemid 40484555)
4. Nino-Murcia M, Olcott E W, Jeffrey Jr R B, LamMR L, Beaulieu C F, Ja in K A. Focal liver lesions: Pattern-based classificationscheme for enhancementat arterial phase CT. Radiology. 2000; 215: 746-751 (Pubitemid 30346009)
5. Federle M P, Blachar A. CT evaluation of the liver: Principles and techniques. Semin Liver Disease. 2001; 21:135-145 (Pubitemid 32552247)
6. Mart in D R, Semelka R C. Imaging of benign and malignant focal liver lesions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2001; 9:785-802.
7. Cosgrove D. Ultrasound contrast agents: An overview. Eur J Radiol. 2006; 60:324-330
8. Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T, Bolondi L, Bosio M, Calliada F, et al. Guidelines and good clinical recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound-update 2008. Ultraschall Med. 2008; 29:28-44.
9. Ripolles T, Puig J. Actualización del uso de contrastes en ecografía. Revisión de las Guías Clínicas de la Federación Europea de Ecografía(EFSUMB). Radiología. 2009; 51:362-375
10. Quaia E, Calliada F, Bertolotto M, Rossi S, Garioni L, Rosa L, et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast specific US modes and a sulphur hexafluoride-filled micro-bubble contrast agent: Diagnostic performance and confidence. Radiology. 2004; 232:420-430 (Pubitemid 38971282)
11. Isozaki T, Numata K, Takayoshi K, Hara K, Morimoto M, Sakaguchi T, et al. Differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors by using contrast enhancement patterns at US. Radiology. 2003; 229 798-805. (Pubitemid 37467586)
12. Nicolau C, Vilana R, Catala C, Bianchi L, Gilabert R, García A, et al. The importance of the evaluation of all vascular phase son contrast enhanced sonography in the differentiation of benign from malignant focal liver lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 186:158-167 (Pubitemid 46100378)
13. Wen Y L, Kudo M, Zheng R Q, Minami Y, Chung H, Suetomi Y, et al. Radio frequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Therapeutic response using contrast enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 181:57-63. (Pubitemid 36741461)
14. Vilana R, Bianchi L, Varela M, Nicolau C, Sánchez M, Ayuso C, et al. Is microbubble-enhanced ultrasonography sufficient for assessment of response to percutaneous treatment in patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma ? Eur Radiol. 2006; 16:2454-2462 (Pubitemid 44649694)
15. Setola S V, Catalano O, S and omenico F, Siani A. contrast-enhanced sonography of the kidney. Abdom Imaging. 2007; 33: 21-28 (Pubitemid 46742685)
16. Mitterberger M, Pinggera G M, Colleselli D, Bartsch G, Strasser H, Steppan I, et al. Acute pyelonephritis: Comparison of diagnosis with computed tomography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. BJU Int. 2008; 101:341-344
17. D' Onofrio M, Zamboni G, Faccioli N, Capelli P, Pozzi Mucelli R. Ultrasonography of the pancreas. contrast enhanced imaging. Abdom Imaging. 2007; 32:171-181
18. Catalano O, Sandomenico F, Matarazzo I, Siani A. contrast-enhanced sonography of the spleen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184:1844-1850
19. Catalano O, Aiani L, Barozzi L, Bokor D, de Marchi A, Faletti C, et al. C E US in abdominal trauma: Multi-center study. Abdom Imaging. 2009; 34:225-234
20. Leen E, Ceccotti P, Kalogeropoulou C, Angerson W J, Moug S J, Horgan P G. Prospective multi center trial evaluating a novel method of characterizing focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 186: 1551-1559 (Pubitemid 46112517)
21. Tranquart F, Correas J M, Ladam Marcus V, Manzoni P, Vilgra in V, et al. Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of focal liver lesions: Diagnostic efficacy and economical issues from a French multicentric study. J Radiol. 2009; 90:109-122
22. Strobel D, Seitz K, Blank W, Schuler A, Dietrich C, Von Herbay A, et al. contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions-diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice (DEGUM multi center trial). Ultraschall Med. 2008; 29499-29505
23. Albrecht T, Blomley M, Bolondi L, Claudon M, Correas J M, Cosgrove D, et al. E F S U M B Study Group. Guideline s for the use of contrast agent s in ultrasound. January2004. Ultraschall Med. 2004; 25:249-256
24. Jakobsen J A, Oyen R, Thomsen H S, Morcos S K, Committee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Safety of ultrasound contrast agents. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15:941-945 (Pubitemid 41174436)
25. Puig J, Ripollés T, Talegón A. Mediosde contrast eporecografía. En: Mediosde contraste en Radiología. Madrid: Ed. Panameri-cana; 2008. p. 77-80.
26. Wilson S R, Burns P N. Analgorithm for the diagnosis of focal liver masses using microbubble contrast-enhanced pulse-in version sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 186:1401-1412
27. Catala V, Nicolau C, Vilana R, Pages M, Bianchi L, Sánchez M, et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions: Comparative study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17:1066-1073 (Pubitemid 46766888)
28. Burns P N, Wilson S R. Focal liver masses: Enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced images. Concordance of US scans with CT scans and MR images. Radiology. 2007; 213:831-836
29. Solbiati L, Ierace T, Tonolini M, Cova L. Guidance and monitoring of radio frequency liver tumorablation with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Eur J Radiol. 2004; 51: S19-23. (Pubitemid 38845009)
30. Nicolau C, Vilana R, Bianchi L, BrúC. Early-stagehepatocellular carcinoma: The high accuracy of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the assessment of response to percutaneous treatment. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17: F80-8.
31. Krejza J, Baumgartner R W. Clinical applications of transcranial color-coded duplex sonography. J Neuro imaging. 2004; 14: 215-225 (Pubitemid 38781391)
32. Hou W H, Liu X, Duan Y Y, Wang J, Sun S G, Deng J P, et al. Evaluation of transcranial color-coded duplex sonography for cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009; 27:479-484
33. Ferrer J M, SamsóJ J, Serrando J R, Valenzuela V F, Montoya S B, Docampo M M. Use of ultrasound contrast in the diagnosis of carotid arteryocclusion. J Vasc Surg. 2000; 31:736-741 (Pubitemid 30214486)
34. Hammond C J, Mc Pherson S J, Patel J V, Gough M J. Assessment of apparentinternalcarotidocclusionon ultrasound: Prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008; 35:405-412
35. Ascenti G, Mazziotti S, Zimbaro G, Sttineri N, Magno C, Melloni D, et al. complex cystic renal masses: Characterization with contrast-enhanced US. Radiology. 2007; 243:158-165 (Pubitemid 46579706)
36. Park B K, Kim B, Kim S H, Ko K, Lee H M, Choi H Y. Assessment of cystic renal masses based on Bosniak classification: Comparison of CT and contrast enhanced US. Eur J Radiol. 2007; 61: 310-314 (Pubitemid 46110861)
37. Rubaltelli L, Corrad in S, Dorigo A, Tregnaghi A, Adami F, Rossi C R, et al. Automated quantitative evaluation of lymphnode perfusion on contrast-enhanced sonography. AJR Am J Roent-genol. 2007; 188:977-983 (Pubitemid 46496929)
38. Balleyguier C, Opolon P, Mathieu M C, Athanasiou A, Garbay J R, Delaloge S, et al. new potential and applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the breast: Own investigations and review of the literature. Eur J Radiol. 2009; 69:14-23.
39. Moon W K, Im J G, Noh D Y, Han M C. Nonpalpable breast lesions: Evaluation with power Doppler US and a microbubble contrast agent-initial experience. Radiology. 2000; 217:240-246
40. Martínez A M, Med in a C J, Bustos C, Hernández J A. Assessment of breast lesions using Doppler with contrast agents. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003; 24:527-530