Hydrophilic fluorescent nanogel thermometer for intracellular thermometry

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 131, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 2766-2767

  Gota, Chie ^a   Okabe, Kohki ^a,b   Funatsu, Takashi ^a   Harada, Yoshie ^b   Uchiyama, Seiichi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b TOKYO METROPOLITAN INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL PROCESS; HIGHER TEMPERATURES; NANOGELS; TEMPERATURE RESOLUTION; TEMPERATURE VARIATION;

CYTOLOGY; FLUORESCENCE; HYDROPHILICITY; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; THERMOMETERS;

TEMPERATURE SENSORS;

POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; FLUORESCENT DYE; NANOMATERIAL; POLY N ISOPROPYLACRYLAMIDE; POLY-N-ISOPROPYLACRYLAMIDE;

ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CYTOPLASM; GEL; PH; PRECIPITATION; THERMOMETER; THERMOMETRY; ANIMAL; CELL STRAIN COS1; CERCOPITHECUS; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ANIMALS; CERCOPITHECUS AETHIOPS; COS CELLS; CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; FLUORESCENT DYES; NANOSTRUCTURES; THERMOMETERS;

EID: 77950859284     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: 15205126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja807714j     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Meyerhof, O.; Lohmann, K. Biochem. Z. 1932, 253,431-461.
2. (a) Nakamura, T.; Matsuoka, I. J. Biochem. 1978, 84,39-46.
3. (b) Lowell. B. B.; Spiegelman, B. M. Nature 2000, 404, 652-660.
4. (a) Monti, M.; Brandt, L.; Ikomi-Kumm, J.; Olsson, H. Scand. J.Haematol. 1986, 36, 353-357.
5. (b) Karnebogen, M.; Singer , D.; Kafierhoff, M.; Ringert, R.-H.Thermochim. Acta 1993, 229, 147-155.
6. (a) Tanaka, H.; Yoshimura, H.; Mivake, Y.; Imaizumi, J.; Nagayama, K.;Shimizu, H. Protoplasma 1987, 138, 98-104.
7. (b) Childs, P. R. N.; Greenwood, J R.; Long, C. A. Rev. Sci.Instrum. 2000, 71, 2959-2978.
8. Suzuki, M.; Tseeb, V.; Oyama, k.; Ishiwata, S. Biophys. J.2007, 92, L46-L48.
9. (a) Engeser, M.; Fabbrizzi, L.; Licchelli, M.; Sacchi, D. Chem.Commun. 1999, 1191-1192.
10. (b) Ross, D.; Gaitan, M.; Locascio, L.E. Anal. Chem. 2001,73, 4117-4123.
11. (c) Borisov, S. M.; Wolfbeis, O. S. Anal. Chem. 2006,78, 5094-5101.
12. (a) Uchiyama, S.; Matsumura, Y.; de Silva, A. P.; Iwai, K. Anal.Chem. 2003, 75, 5926-5935.
13. (b) Iwai, K.; Matsumura, Y.; Uchiyama, S.; de Silva, A. P. J. Mtater.Chem. 2005m, 15, 2796-2800.
14. (a) Chapman, C. F.; Liu, Y.; Sonek, G. J.; Tromberg, B. J. Photochem.Potobiol. 1995, 62, 416-425.
15. (b) Zohar, O.; Ikeda, M.; Shinagawa, H.; Inoue, H.; Nakamura, H.; Elbaum,D.; Alkon, D. L.; Yoshioka, T. Biophys. J. 1998, 74,82-89.
16. (c) Uchiyama, S.; Kawai, N.; de Silva, A. P.;Iwai, K. J. Am. Chem.Soc. 2004, 126, 3032-3033.
17. Pelton, R. Ady. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 85,1-33.
18. Gota, C.; Uchivama, S.; Yoshihara, T.; Tobita, S.; Ohwada, T. J.Phys.Chem. B 2008, 112, 2829-2836.
19. This was confirmed by elemental analysis of sulfur. See the SupportingInformation.
20. A transmission electron microscopy image indicated that the averagediameter of 1 was 51.2 ± 10.5 nm (mean ± s.d.) in the dried state.Dynamic light scattering and fluorescence measurements on 1 dispersed in waterdemonstrated a reversible heat-induced size variation and consequentfluorescence switching. See Figures S1-S3 in the Supporting Information.
21. A related temperature-jump investigation revealed that heat-inducedshrinking of a polyNIPAM nanogel occurs on a microsecond time scale. See: Wang.J.; Gan, D.; Lyon, L. A.; El-Saved, M. A. J.Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,123, 11284-11289.
22. Lodish, H. F.; Berk, A.; Matsudaira, P.; Kaiser, C. A.; Krieger, M.;Scott, M. P.; Zipursky, S. L.; Damell, J. Molecular Cell Biology, 5thed.; W. H. Freeman: New York, 2003; pp 253 and 261.
23. Llopis, J.; McCafferv, J. M.; Miyawaki, A.; Farquhar, M. G.; Tsien, R. Y.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 6803-6808.
24. For detailed data, see the Supporting Information.
25. The response curve of 1 in the COS7 cells (2.6-fold fluorescenceenhancement over the range 27-33°C) was not identical to that in the 150 mMKCl solution (5.3-fold over the range 30-40°C). This gap is possibly due tocomplexity of intracellular environments, and therefore, a calibration curveshould be obtained for each cell species before intracellular thermometry.
26. The estimated contribution of autofluorescence to the ordinate was<0.016.
27. Lowe. J. S.; Chowdhry, B. Z.; Parsonage, J. R.; Snowden, M. J.Polymer 1998, 39, 1207-1212.
28. Heytler, P. G.; Prichard, W. W. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.1962, 7, 272-275.
29. Del Bino, G.; Skierski, J. S.; Darzvnkiewicz, Z. Exp. Cell Res.1991, 195, 485-491.