Estimating firm size elasticities of product and process R&D

Economica

Volumn 77, Issue 306, 2010, Pages 384-402

  Inkmann, Joachim ^a  

^a NETSPAR   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMAND ELASTICITY; FIRM SIZE; INVERSE ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROBABILITY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 77950847030     PISSN: 00130427     EISSN: 14680335     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2008.00768.x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Abowd J M, Crepon B, Kramarz F. Moment estimation with attrition: an application to economic models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2001, 96((456)):1223-31.
2. Angrist J D. Conditional independence in sample selection models. Economics Letters 1997, 54:103-12.
3. Angrist J D, Imbens G W, Krueger A. Jackknife instrumental variables estimation. Journal of Applied Econometrics 1999, 14:57-67.
4. Arvanitis S. The impact of firm size on innovative activity-an empirical analysis based on Swiss firm data. Small Business Economics 1997, 9:473-90.
5. Back K, Brown D P. Implied probabilities in GMM estimators. Econometrica 1993, 61((4)):971-5.
6. Bertschek I, Lechner M. Convenient estimators for the panel probit model. Journal of Econometrics 1998, 87:329-71.
7. Brown B W, Newey W K. Efficient semiparametric estimation of expectations. Econometrica 1998, 66((2)):453-64.
8. Brown B W, Newey W K. Generalized method of moments, efficient bootstrapping, and improved inference. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 2002, 20((4)):507-17.
9. Buse A. The bias of instrumental variable estimators. Econometrica 1992, 60:173-80.
10. Cohen W M, Klepper S. Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: the case of process and product R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics 1996a, 78:232-43.
11. Cohen W M, Klepper S. A reprise of size and R&D. Economic Journal 1996b, 106((437)):925-51.
12. Corcoran S A. Bartlett adjustment of empirical discrepancy statistics. Biometrika 1998, 85:967-972.
13. Cressie N, Read T R C. Multinomial goodness-of-fit tests. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1984, 46:440-64.
14. Dawid A P. Conditional independence in statistical theory. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1979, 41:1-31.
15. Donald S G, Newey W K. A jackknife interpretation of the continuous updating estimator. Economics Letters 2000, 67:239-43.
16. Fitzgerald J, Gottschalk P, Moffitt R. An analysis of sample attrition in panel data. Journal of Human Resources 1998, 23((2)):251-99.
17. Fritsch M, Meschede M. Product innovation, process innovation, and size. Review of Industrial Organization 2001, 19((3)):335-50.
18. Gouriéroux C, Holly A, Monfort A. Likelihood ratio test, Wald test, and Kuhn-Tucker test in linear models with inequality constraints on the regression parameters. Econometrica 1982, 50((1)):63-80.
19. Hahn J. On the role of the propensity score in efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects. Econometrica 1998, 66:315-31.
20. Hansen L P. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 1982, 50((4)):1029-54.
21. Hansen L P, Heaton J, Yaron A. Finite-sample properties of some alternative GMM estimators. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 1996, 14((3)):262-80.
22. Harhoff D, Licht G. Das Mannheimer Innovationspanel. Firmenpanelstudien in Deutschland, konzeptionelle Überlegungen und empirische Analysen 1994, 255-84. Hochmuth U, Wagner J. In, (eds), Tübinger, Volkswirtschaftliche Schriften, pp
23. Hausman J A, Wise D A. Attrition bias in experimental and panel data: the Gary income maintenance experiment. Econometrica 1979, 47((2)):455-73.
24. Heckman J J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 1979, 47:153-62.
25. Heckman J J. Econometrics and empirical economics. Journal of Econometrics 2001, 100:3-5.
26. Hirano K, Imbens G W, Ridder G. Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 2003, 71((4)):1161-89.
27. Hirano K, Imbens G W, Rubin D B. Combining panel data sets with attrition and refreshment samples. Econometrica 2001, 69((6)):1645-59.
28. Holland P W. Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1986, 81:945-70.
29. Horowitz J L. Semiparametric and nonparametric estimation of quantal response models. Handbook of Statistics 1993, Vol. 11. Maddala G SRao C RVinod H D. In, (eds), Amsterdam, North-Holland
30. Horowitz J L, Manski C F. Censoring of outcomes and regressors due to survey nonresponse: identification and estimation using weights and imputation. Journal of Econometrics 1998, 84:37-58.
31. Horvitz D, Thompson D. A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite population. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1952, 47:663-85.
32. Imbens G W. One-step estimators for over-identified generalized method of moments models. Review of Economic Studies 1997, 64:359-83.
33. Imbens G W, Spady R H, Johnson P. Information-theoretic approaches to inference in moment condition models. Econometrica 1998, 66((2)):333-58.
34. Inkmann J. Misspecified heteroskedasticity in the panel probit model: a small sample comparison of GMM and SML estimators. Journal of Econometrics 2000, 97:227-59.
35. Inkmann J. Conditional Moment Estimation of Nonlinear Equation Systems-With an Application to an Oligopoly Model of Cooperative R&D 2001, Vol. 497. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Heidelberg, Springer
36. Kitamura Y, Stutzer M. An information-theoretic alternative to generalized method of moments estimation. Econometrica 1997, 65((4)):861-74.
37. Klepper S. Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. American Economic Review 1996, 86((3)):562-83.
38. Lechner M. Ökonometrische Modelle für qualitative Paneldaten: Das Beispiel der selbständigen Erwerbstätigkeit in den neuen Bundesländern 1995, Frankfurt, Campus
39. Little R J A, Rubin D B. Statistical Analysis With Missing Data 1987, New York, Wiley
40. Manski C F. Analog Estimation Methods in Econometrics 1988, New York, Chapman & Hall
41. Nevo A. Sample selection and information-theoretic alternatives to GMM. Journal of Econometrics 2002, 107:149-57.
42. Nevo A. Using weights to adjust for sample selection when auxiliary information is available. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 2003, 21((1)):43-51.
43. Newey W K. A method of moments interpretation of sequential estimators. Economics Letters 1984, 14:201-6.
44. Newey W K. The asymptotic variance of semiparametric estimators. Econometrica 1994, 62((6)):1349-82.
45. Newey W K. Consistency of two-step sample selection estimators despite misspecification of distribution. Economics Letters 1999, 63:129-32.
46. Newey W K, McFadden D L. Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing. Handbook of Econometrics 1994, Vol. 4:2111-245. Engle R F, McFadden D L. In, (eds), Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp
47. Newey W K, Smith R J. Higher order properties of GMM and generalized empirical likelihood estimators. Econometrica 2004, 72((1)):219-55.
48. Newey W K, West K D. Hypothesis testing with efficient method of moments estimation. International Economic Review 1987, 28:777-87.
49. Owen A B. Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional. Biometrika 1988, 75:237-49.
50. Qin J, Lawless J. Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations. Annals of Statistics 1994, 22((1)):300-25.
51. Rendtel U. Lebenslagen im Wandel: Panelausfälle und Panelrepräsentativität 1995, Frankfurt, Campus
52. Ridder G. Attrition in multi-wave panel data. Panel Data and Labor Market Studies 1990, 45-68. Hartog JRidder GTheeuwes J. In, (eds), Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp
53. Robins J M, Rotnitzky A. Semiparametric efficiency in multivariate regression models with missing data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995, 90((429)):122-9.
54. Robins J M, Rotnitzky A, Zhao L P. Analysis of semiparametric regression models for repeated outcomes in the presence of missing data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995, 90((429)):106-21.
55. Rosenbaum P R, Rubin D B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983, 70:41-55.
56. Rubin D B. Inference and missing data. Biometrika 1976, 63:581-92.
57. Rubin D B. Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. Journal of Educational Statistics 1977, 66:688-701.
58. Rubin D B. Bayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization. Annals of Statistics 1978, 6:34-58.
59. Scherer F M. Changing perspectives on the firm size problem. R&D, Patents and Productivity 1991, 417-61. Acs Z JAudretsch D B. In, (eds), Chicago, University Press, pp
60. Schnell R. Nonresponse in Bevölkerungsumfragen 1997, Opladen, Leske & Budrich
61. Smith R J. Alternative semiparametric likelihood approaches to generalized method of moments estimation. Economic Journal 1997, 107:503-19.
62. Verbeek M, Nijman T. Incomplete panels and selection bias. The Econometrics of Panel Data 1996, Mátyás L, Sevestre P. In, (eds), 2nd edn, Dordrecht, Kluwer, ch. 18
63. Wang Q, Linton O, Härdle W. Semiparametric regression analysis with missing response at random. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2004, 99((466)):334-45.
64. Wooldridge J M. Inverse probability weighted M-estimators for sample selection, attrition and stratification. Portuguese Economic Journal 2002, 1:117-39.