Performing media: Toward an ethnography of intertextuality

Media anthropology

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 129-138

  Peterson, Mark Allen ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950845822     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452233819.n13     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Abu-Lughod, L. (1993). Finding a place for Islam: Egyptian television serials and the national interest. Public Culture, 5(3), 493-513.
2. Abu-Lughod, L. (1995a). Movie stars and Islamic moral-ism in Egypt. Social Text, 42, 53-67.
3. Abu-Lughod, L. (1995b). The objects of soap opera: Egyptian television and the cultural politics of modernity. In D.Miller (Ed.), Worlds apart: Modernity through the prism of the local(pp. 190-210). New York: Routledge.
4. Abu-Lughod, L. (1997). The interpretation of culture(s) after television. Representations, 59, 109-134.
5. Alasuutari, P. (1992). "I'm ashamed to admit it, but I have watched Dallas": The moral hierarchy of television programmes. Media, Culture and Society, 14, 561-582.
6. Andersen, R. (1995). Consumer culture and TV programming. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
7. Armbrust, W. (1996). Mass culture and modernization in Egypt. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Armbrust, W. (1998). Terrorism and kebab: A Capraesque view of modern Egypt. In S.Zuhur (Ed.), Images of enchantment: Visual and performing arts of the Middle East(pp. 283-299). Cairo, Egypt: American University in Cairo Press.
9. Bacon-Smith, C. (1992). Enterprising women: Television fan-dom and the creation of popular myth. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
10. Bacon-Smith, C. (2000). Science fiction culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
11. Bakhtin, M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M.Holquist & C.Emerson (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M.Holquist, Trans., pp. 259-422). Austin: University of Texas Press.
12. Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 59-88.
13. Beeman, W. O., & Peterson, M. A. (2001). Situations and interpretations: Explorations in interpretive practice. Anthropological Quarterly74(4), 159-162.
14. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R.Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. Briggs, C, & Bauman, R. (1992). Genre, intertextuality and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology2, 131-172.
16. Caughey, J. L. (1984a). Imaginary social worlds: A cultural approach. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
17. Caughey, J. L. (1984b). Social relations with media figures. In G.Gumpert & R S.Cathcart (Eds.), Inter/media: Interpersonal communication in a media world(pp. 219-252). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
18. Caughey, J. L. (1995). Imaginary social relationships. In J.Harris & J.Rosen (Eds.), Media journal: Reading and writing about popular culture. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
19. Dickey, S. (1993). Cinema and the urban poor in South India. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20. Dickey, S. (2001). Opposing faces: Film star, fan clubs and the construction of class identities in South India. In R.Dwyer & C.Pinney (Eds.), Pleasure and the nation: The history, politics and consumption of popular culture in India(pp. 212-246). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
21. Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
22. Fiske, J. (1989). Reading the popular. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
23. Genette, G. (1998). Palimpsests: Literature in the second degree (C.Newman & C.Dubinsky, Trans.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
24. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25. Gumperz, J. J. (1971). The speech community. In P. P.Giglioli (Ed.), Language and social context(pp. 219-231). New York: Viking.
26. Gumperz, J. J. (1990). Contextualization and understanding. In A.Duranti & C.Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context(pp. 229-252). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Gumperz, J. J. (1995). The linguistic and cultural relativity of conversational inference. In J. J.Gumperz & S. C.Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity(pp. 374-406). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. New York: Routledge.
29. Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language (A. A.Jardine, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
30. Lembo, R. (2000). Thinking through television. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
31. Lynd, R. (1937). Middletown revisited. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
32. Mikulak, B. (1998). Fans versus Time Warner: Who owns Looney Tunes? In K. S.Sandler (Ed.), Reading the rabbit: Explorations in Warner Bros. animation(pp. 193-208). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
33. Olson, S. R. (1987). Meta-television: Popular postmodernism. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4(31), 284-300.
34. Pierce, C. S. (1977). Semiotic and significs. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
35. Peterson, M. A. (2003). Anthropology and mass communication: Myth and media in the new millennium. Oxford, England: Berghahn.
36. Silverstein, M., & Urban, G. (Eds.). (1996). Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Spitulnik, D. (1996). The social circulation of media discourse and the mediation of communities. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 6(2), 161-187.
38. Spitulnik, D. (1999). The language of the city: Town Bemba as urban hybridityJournal of Linguistic Anthropology, 8(1), 30-59.
39. Stam, R. (1989). Subversive pleasures: Bakhtin, cultural criticism and film. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40. Wilk, R (1995). "It's destroying a whole generation": Television and moral discourse in Belize. Visual Anthropology, 5, 229-244.