In vitro comparison of the new in-line monitor BMU 40 versus a conventional laboratory analyzer

Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 61-70

  Grosse, F Oliver ^a   Holzhey, David ^b   Falk, Volkmar ^b   Schaarschmidt, Jan ^a   Kraemer, Klaus ^a   Mohr, Friedrich W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Blood parameter; Cardiopulmonary bypass; Continuous in line blood parameter monitoring system; Laboratory analyzer; Sensor reliability

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BLOOD; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HEMATOCRIT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; HYPOTHERMIA; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY TEST; OXYGEN SATURATION; OXYGEN TENSION; OXYGENATION; RELIABILITY; SENSOR; SIMULATION; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 77950829418     PISSN: 00221058     EISSN: 29698960     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Rubsamen DS. Continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass-How soon will it be the standard of care? J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1990;4:1-4.
2. Mark JB, FitzGerald D, Fenton T, et al. Continuous arterial and venous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;102:431-439
3. Walton HG, Boucher D, Linne D. Clinical evaluation of the CDI-100 in-line hematocrit/saturation monitor. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1999;31:80-83 (Pubitemid 29506324)
4. Trowbridge CC, Vasquez M, Stammers AH, et al. The effects of continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass: A prospective, randomized study-part 2. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:129-137
5. Walton HG, Duvall TB, Van den Hout J, Boucher DM. Comparison of blood gas and electrolyte test results from the Gem-Stat and CDI-300 versus a conventional laboratory analyzer. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1993;25:53-57 (Pubitemid 23195594)
6. Fried DW, Leo JJ, Mattioni GJ, et al. CDI blood parameter monitoring system 500IIa new tool for the clinical perfusionist. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:25-30.
7. Southworth R, Sutton R, Mize S, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new in-line continuous blood gas monitor. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1998;30:166-170 (Pubitemid 29152671)
8. Trowbridge CC, Vasquez M, Stammers AH, et al. The effects of continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass: A prospective, randomized study-part 1. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:120-128
9. Schreur A, Niles S, Ploessl J. Use of the CDI blood parameter monitoring system 500 for continuous blood gas measurement during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation simulation. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005;37:377-380 (Pubitemid 351506614)
10. Svenmarker S, Lindholm R, Häggmark S, Jansson E, Benze S. Clinical evaluation of the CDI System 400 blood gas monitor. Perfusion. 1994;9:71-76 (Pubitemid 24094080)
11. 2 , Hb and Hct monitoring, intermittent ABL-4 saturation and Hb monitoring, and lab Hb and Hct monitoring. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1996;47:199-206.
12. Yaskulka SM, Burnside J, Bennett D, Olshove V, Langwell J. Accuracy of in-line venous saturation and hematocrit monitors in pediatric perfusion. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1995;27:132-136
13. Gøthgen IH, Siggard-Andersen O, Rasmussen JP, Wimberley PD, Fogh-Andersen N. Fiber-optic chemical sensors (Gas-Stat®) for blood gas monitoring during hypothermic extracorporeal circulation. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1987;47(Suppl 188):27-29 (Pubitemid 18016533)
14. Pino JA, Basheim G, Kenny MA. In vitro assessment of a flow-through fluometric blood gas monitor. J Clin Monit. 1988;4:186-194
15. Walton HG, Boucher DM, Marroquin R. Comparison of blood gas and electrolyte test results from the Gem-Premier and the ABL-70 versus a conventional laboratory analyzer. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2003;35:24-27 (Pubitemid 36337275)
16. Steinfelder-Visscher J, Weerwind PW, Teerenstra S, Brouwer MHJ. Reliability of point-of-care hematocrit, blood gas, electrolyte, lactate and glucose measurement during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2006;21:33-37 (Pubitemid 43263178)
17. Musat A, Ouardirhi Y, Marty JC, Benkhadran S, David M, Girard C. Significance of continuous blood gas monitoring in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21: 980-981 (Pubitemid 40288924)
18. Ferries LH. Standards of care in perfusion: Should not continuous in-line blood gas monitoring be one? J Extra Corpor Technol. 1992;24:45-48
19. Prichard JS, French JS, Alvar N. Clinical Evaluation of the ABL-77 for point-of-care analysis in the cardiovascular operating room. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:128-133 (Pubitemid 351506596)
20. Baraka A, Baroody M, Haroun S, et al. Continuous venous oximetry during cardiopulmonary bypass: Influence of temperature changes, perfusion flow, and hematocrit levels. J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1990;4:35-38 (Pubitemid 20051682)
21. Pappert D, Rossaint R, Lewandowski K, Kuhlen R, Gerlach H, Falke KJ. Preliminary evaluation of a new continuous intra-arterial blood gas monitoring device. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995;39(Supplementum 107):67-70.
22. Larson CP Jr, Vender J, Seiver A. Multisite evaluation of a continuous intraarterial blood gas monitoring system. Anesthesiology. 1994; 81:543-552 (Pubitemid 24320661)
23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1: 307-310 (Pubitemid 16134762)