Goal-oriented error estimation and adaptivity for free-boundary problems: The domain-map linearization approach

SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 1084-1092

  Van Der Zee, K G ^a   Van Brummelen, E H ^b   De Borst, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

A Posteriori Error Estimation; Adaptive Mesh Refinement; Bernoulli Free Bboundary Problem; Domain Mmap Linearization; Goal Oriented Error Estimation; Linearized Adjoint

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS; ERROR ANALYSIS; EULER EQUATIONS; MESH GENERATION;

A-POSTERIORI ERROR ESTIMATIONS; ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT; ADJOINTS; BERNOULLI; BERNOULLI FREE-BBOUNDARY PROBLEM; DOMAIN-MMAP LINEARIZATION; FREE-BOUNDARY PROBLEMS; GOAL-ORIENTED ERROR ESTIMATION; LINEARISATION; LINEARIZED ADJOINT;

LINEARIZATION;

EID: 77950809885     PISSN: 10648275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/080741227     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. M. AINSWORTH AND J. T. ODEN, A Posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis, Pure Appl. Math., Wiley, New York, 2000.
2. Y. BAZILEVS, V. M. CALO, T. J. R. HUGHES, AND Y. ZHANG, Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: Theory, algorithms, and computations, Comput. Mech., 43 (2008), pp. 3-37.
3. R. BECKER AND R. RANNACHER, An optimal control approach to a posteriori error estimation in finite element methods, Acta Numer., 10 (2001), pp. 1-102.
4. P. BINEV, W. DAHMEN, AND R. DEVORE, Adaptive finite element methods with convergence rates, Numer. Math., 97 (2004), pp. 219-268.
5. F. BOUCHON, S. CLAIN, AND R. TOUZANI, A perturbation method for the numerical solution of the Bernoulli problem, J. Comput. Math., 26 (2008), pp. 23-36.
6. C. CUVELIER AND R. M. S. M. SCHULKES, Some numerical methods for the computation of capillary free boundaries governed by the Navier-Stokes equations, SIAM Rev., 32 (1990), pp. 355-423.
7. M. C. DELFOUR AND J.-P. ZOLESIO, Structure of shape derivatives for nonsmooth domains, J. Funct. Anal., 104 (1992), pp. 1-33.
8. M. C. DELFOUR AND J.-P. ZOLÉSIO, Shapes and Geometries: Analysis, Differential Calculus, and Optimization, SIAM Ser. Adv. Design and Control 4, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 2001.
9. M. C. DELFOUR AND J.-P. ZOLÉSIO, Tangential calculus and shape derivatives, in Shape Optimization and Optimal Design: Proceedings of the IFIP Conference, Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math. 216, J. Cagnol, M. P. Polis, and J.-P. Zolésio, eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001, pp. 37-60.
10. T. DUNNE, An Eulerian approach to fluid-structure interaction and goal-oriented mesh adaptation, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 51 (2006), pp. 1017-1039.
11. K. EPPLER AND H. HARBRECHT, Efficient treatment of stationary free boundary problems, Appl. Numer. Math., 56 (2006), pp. 1326-1339.
12. K. EPPLER, H. HARBRECHT, AND R. SCHNEIDER, On convergence in elliptic shape optimization, SIAM J. Control Optim., 46 (2007), pp. 61-83.
13. M. A. FERNÁNDEZ AND M. MOUBACHIR, A Newton method using exact Jacobians for solving fluid-structure interaction, Comput. & Structures, 83 (2005), pp. 127-142.
14. M. FLUCHER AND M. RUMPF, Bernoulli's free-boundary problem, qualitative theory and numerical approximation, J. Reine Angew. Math., 486 (1997), pp. 165-204.
15. A. FRIEDMAN, Variational Principles and Free-Boundary Problems, Pure Appl. Math., Wiley, New York, 1982.
16. M. B. GILES AND E. SÜLI, Adjoint methods for PDEs: A posteriori error analysis and post-processing by duality, Acta Numer., 11 (2002), pp. 145-236.
17. P. GRISVARD, Elliptic Problems in Nonsmooth Domains, Monogr. Stud. Math. 24, Pitman Publishing, London, 1985.
18. S. C. GUPTA, The Classical Stefan Problem: Basic Concepts, Modelling and Analysis,North-Holland Ser. Appl. Math. Mech. 45, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003.
19. R. HARTMANN, Multitarget error estimation and adaptivity in aerodynamic flow simulations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 31 (2008), pp. 708-731.
20. R. HARTMANN AND P. HOUSTON, Adaptive discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods for nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 24 (2003), pp. 979-1004.
21. J. HASLINGER, T. KOZUBEK, K. KUNISCH, AND G. PEICHL, Shape optimization and fictitious domain approach for solving free boundary problems of Bernoulli type, Comput. Optim. Appl., 26 (2003), pp. 231-251.
22. J. HASLINGER AND P. NEITTAANMÄKI, Finite Element Approximation for Optimal Shape, Material and Topology Design, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 1996.
23. J. HOFFMAN, On duality-based a posteriori error estimation in various norms and linear functionals for large eddy simulation, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 26 (2004), pp. 178-195.
24. P. HOUSTON AND E. SÜLI, hp-Adaptive discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods for first-order hyperbolic problems, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 23 (2001), pp. 1226-1252.
25. K. T. KÄRKKÄINEN AND T. TIIHONEN, Free surfaces: Shape sensitivity analysis and numerical methods, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 44 (1999), pp. 1079-1098.
26. C. M. KUSTER, P. A. GREMAUD, AND R. TOUZANI, Fast numerical methods for Bernoulli free boundary problems, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 29 (2007), pp. 622-634.
27. M. G. LARSON, R. SÖDERLUND, AND F. BENGZON, Adaptive finite element approximation of coupled flow and transport problems with applications in heat transfer,Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 57 (2008), pp. 1397-1420.
28. F. LARSSON, P. HANSBO, AND K. RUNESSON, Strategies for computing goal-oriented a posteriori error measures in non-linear elasticity, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 55 (2002), pp. 879-894.
29. G. MEJAK, Numerical solution of Bernoulli-type free boundary value problems by variable domain method, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 37 (1994), pp. 4219-4245.
30. H. MELBØ AND T. KVAMSDAL, Goal oriented error estimators for Stokes equations based on variationally consistent postprocessing, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 192 (2003), pp. 613-633.
31. M. S. MOMMER AND R. STEVENSON, A goal-oriented adaptive finite element method with convergence rates, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 47 (2009), pp. 861-886.
32. K.-S. MOON, E. VON SCHWERIN, A. SZEPESSY, AND R. TEMPONE, Convergence rates for an adaptive dual weighted residual finite element algorithm, BIT, 46 (2006), pp. 367-407.
33. P. MORIN, R. H. NOCHETTO, AND K. G. SIEBERT, Convergence of adaptive finite element methods, SIAM Rev., 44 (2002), pp. 631-658.
34. O. PIRONNEAU, Optimal Shape Design for Elliptic Systems, Springer Ser. Comput. Phys., Springer, Berlin, 1984.
35. S. PRUDHOMME AND J. T. ODEN, On goal-oriented error estimation for elliptic problems: Application to the control of pointwise errors, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 176 (1999), pp. 313-331.
36. S. PRUDHOMME AND J. T. ODEN, Computable error estimators and adaptive techniques for fluid flow problems, in Error Estimation and Adaptive Discretization Methods in Computational Fluid Dynamics, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng., 25, T. J. Barth and H. Deconinck, eds., Springer, Berlin, 2003, pp. 207-268.
37. J. SOKOLOWSKI AND J.-P. ZOLÉSIO, Introduction to Shape Optimization: Shape Sensitivity Analysis, Springer Ser. Comput. Math. 16, Springer, New York, 1992.
38. P. ŠOLIN AND L. F. DEMKOWICZ, Goal-oriented hp-adaptivity for elliptic problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 193 (2004), pp. 449-468.
39. R. STEVENSON, Optimality of a standard adaptive finite element method, Found. Comput. Math., 7 (2007), pp. 245-269.
40. R. STEVENSON, The completion of locally refined simplicial partitions created by bisection, Math. Comp., 77 (2008), pp. 227-241.
41. E. SÜLI AND P. HOUSTON, Adaptive finite element approximation of hyperbolic problems,in Error Estimation and Adaptive Discretization Methods in Computational Fluid Dynamics, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng. 25, T. J. Barth and H. Deconinck, eds., Springer, Berlin, 2003, pp. 269-344.
42. J. I. TOIVANEN, J. HASLINGER, AND R. A. E. MÄKINEN, Shape optimization of systems governed by Bernoulli free boundary problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 197 (2008), pp. 3802-3815.
43. E. H. VAN BRUMMELEN, Mesh association by projection along smoothed-normal-vector fields: Association of closed manifolds, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 73 (2008), pp. 493-520.
44. E. H. VAN BRUMMELEN AND A. SEGAL, Numerical solution of steady free-surface flows by the adjoint optimal shape design method, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 41 (2003), pp. 3-27.
45. K. G. VAN DER ZEE, Goal-Adaptive Discretization of Fluid-Structure InteractAon,Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft, The Netherlands, June 2009. Available online from http://repository.tudelft.nl.
46. K. G. VAN DER ZEE, E. H. VAN BRUMMELEN, I. AKKERMAN, AND R. DE BORST, Goal-oriented error estimation and adaptivity for fluid-structure interaction using exact linearized adjoints, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., submitted.
47. K. G. VAN DER ZEE, E. H. VAN BRUMMELEN, AND R. DE BORST, Dual-based a-posteriori error estimation for fluid-structure interaction by the embedded domain method, in ECCOMAS CFD 06: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands, 2006, P. Wesseling, E. Oñate, and J. Périaux, eds., CD-ROM (paper 588), TU Delft, The Netherlands, 2006.
48. K. G. VAN DER ZEE, E. H. VAN BRUMMELEN, AND R. DE BORST, Goal-oriented error estimation for Stokes flow interacting with a flexible channel, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 56 (2008), pp. 1551-1557.
49. K. G. VAN DER ZEE, E. H. VAN BRUMMELEN, AND R. DE BORST, Goal-oriented error estimation and adaptivity for free-boundary problems: The shape-linearization approach, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 32 (2010), pp. 1093-1118.
50. R. VERFÜRTH, A Review of A Posteriori Error Estimation and Adaptive Mesh-Refinement Techniques, Adv. Numer. Math., Wiley-Teubner, New York, Stuttgart, 1996.
51. Z. ZHANG AND I. BABUŠKA, A numerical method for steady state free boundary problems,SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 33 (1996), pp. 2184-2214.