Information Technology and Regulatory Policy: New Directions for Digital Government Research

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 85-91

  Coglianese, Cary ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Regulatory Policy Program   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital government; e rulemaking; Information technology; Internet; Regulation; Regulatory policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 0442275755     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894439303259890     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Beierle, T. C. (2003, April). Discussing the rules: Electronic rulemaking and democratic deliberation (Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 03-22). Retrieved from www.rff.org/disc_papers/PDF_files/0322.pdf
2. Belton, K. B. (2000, Fall). What if everyone were a policy analyst? Regulation, 23, 8-9.
3. Brandon, B. H., & Carlitz, R. D. (2003). Online rulemaking and other tools for strengthening our civic infrastructure. Administrative Law Review, 54, 1421-1478.
4. Coglianese, C. (2003). The Internet and public participation in rulemaking (Regulatory Policy Program Working Paper RPP-2003-05). Retrieved from www.ksg.harvard.edu/cbg/research/rpp/RPP-2003-05.pdf
5. Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
6. Hovy, E. (2003). E-Rulemaking: Research problems for IT. Retrieved from www.ksg.harvard.edu/cbg/Conferences/rpp_rulemaking/Hovy_Presentatlon_Fnl.pdf
7. Katz, B., Hurwitz, R., Lin, J. J., & Uzuner, O. (2003). Better public policy through natural language information access. Retrieved from www.ksg.harvard.edu/cbg/Conferences/rpp_rulemaklng/ Hurwitz_Languagelnfo_Access.pdf
8. Kerrigan, S., Heenan, C., Wang, H., Law, K. H., & Wiederhold, G. (2003). Regulatory information management and compliance assistance. Retrieved from http://eil.stanford.edu/publications/shawn_kerrigan/Regnet%20dgo03.pdf
9. Kerwin, C. M. (2003). Rulemaking: How government agencies write law and make policy (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
10. Lau, G., Law, K. H., & Wiederhold, G. (2003). Similarity analysis on government regulations. Retrieved from http://eil.stanford.edu/publications/shawn_kerrigan/Regnet%20dgo03.pdf
11. Lubbers, J. S. (2002). The future of electronic rulemaking: A research agenda (Regulatory Policy Program Working Paper RPP-2002-04). Retrieved from www.ksg.harvard.edu/cbg/research/rpp/RPP-2002-04.pdf
12. Office of Management and Budget. (2002). Stimulating smarter regulation: 2002 report to Congress on the costs and benefits of regulations and unfunded mandates on state, local, and tribal entities. Retrieved from www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/2002_report_to_congress.pdf
13. Shulman, S. W., Schlosberg, D., Zavestoski, S., & Courard-Hauri, D. (2003). Electronic rulemaking: A public participation research agenda for the social sciences. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 1-17.
14. Skrzycki, C. (2003, January 23). U.S. opens online portal to rulemaking: Web site invites wider participation in the regulatory process. The Washington Post, p. E01.