Exploring Long-Term and Short-Term Risk Factors for Serious Delinquency

European Journal of Criminology

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 419-438

  Van Der Laan, André M ^a   Blom, Martine ^a   Kleemans, Edward R ^b  

^a Research and Documentation Centre (WODC)

^b Research and Documentation Centre (WODC)   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Long Term Risk Factors; Opportunity Theory; Self Reported Delinquency; Short Term Risk Factors

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950750259     PISSN: 14773708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1477370809337882     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bernburg, J.G. and Thorlindsson, T. (2001). Routine activities in social context: A closer look at the role of opportunity in deviant behavior. Justice Quarterly 18, 543-67.
2. Briar, S. and Piliavin, I. (1965). Delinquency, situational inducements, and commitment to conformity. Social Problems 13, 35-45.
3. Borooah, V.K. (2002). Logit and probit. Ordered and multinomial models (Rep. No. 138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Clarke, R. V. and Felson, M. (eds) (1993). Routine activity and rational choice. Advances in criminological theory 5. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
6. Cohen, L.E. and Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44, 588-608.
7. Dekoviç, M., Pels, T. and Model, S. (2006). Child rearing in six ethnic families. The multi-cultural Dutch experience. Lampeter, UK: Edwin Mellen Press.
8. Farrington, D.P. (2003). Developmental and life-course criminology: Key theoretical and empirical issues. Criminology 41, 221-56;
9. Farrington, D.P. (2005). The integrated cognitive antisocial potential (ICAP) theory. In D. P. Farrington (ed.) Integrated developmental and life-course theories of offending, pp. 73-92. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
10. Farrington, D.P. and Loeber, R. (2000). Some benefits of dichotomization in psychiatric and criminological research. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 10, 100-22.
11. Fattah, E.A. (1993). The rational choice/opportunity perspectives as a vehicle for integrating criminological and victimological perspectives. In R. V. Clarke and M. Felson (eds) Routine activity and rational choice, pp. 225-58. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
12. Felson, M. (1998). Crime and everyday life, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
13. Fletcher, A.C., Steinberg, L. and Williams-Wheeler, M. (2004). Parental influences on adolescent problem behavior: Revisiting Stattin and Kerr. Child Development 75, 781-96.
14. Goodman, R. (1999). The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 40, 791-9.
15. Haynie, D.L., Silver, E. and Teasdale, B. (2006). Neighborhood characteristics, peer networks, and adolescent violence. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 18, 99-134.
16. Huizinga, D. and Elliott, D.S. (1986). Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 2, 293-327.
17. Liao, T.F. (1994). Interpreting probability models. Logit, probit, and other generalized linear models (Rep. No. 101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Loeber, R., Slot, W. and Sergeant, J.A. (2001). Ernstige en Gewelddadige Jeugddelinquentie. Omvang, Oorzaken en Interventies [Serious and violent juvenile delinquency. Scope, causes and interventions]. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.
19. Loeber, R., Slot, W. and Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2006). A three-dimensional, cumulative developmental model of serious delinquency. In P.-O. H. Wikström and R. J. Sampson (eds) The explanation of crime. Context, mechanisms and development, pp. 153-94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Markus, M.T., Lindhout, I.E., Boer, F., Hoogendijk, T.H.G. and Arrindell, W.A. (2003). Factors of perceived parental rearing styles: The EMBU-C examined in a sample of Dutch primary school children. Personality and Individual Differences 34, 503-19.
21. Nijboer, J.A. (1997). Delinquentie en dwang. Ontwikkeling van delinquent gedrag bij leerlingen van het voortgezet onderwijs [Delinquency and coercion. Development of delinquent behaviour among students in secondary education]. Groningen: Strafrecht en Criminologie, RU Groningen.
22. Osgood, D.W., Wilson, J.K., O'Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G. and Johnston, L.D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review 61, 635-55.
23. Osgood, D.W. and Anderson, A.L. (2004). Unstructured socializing and rates of delinquency. Criminology 42, 519-49.
24. Pauwels, L. (2007). Buurtinvloeden en jeugddelinquentie. Een toets van de sociale desorganisatietheorie [Neighbourhood influences and juvenile delinquency. Testing the social disorganization theory]. The Hague: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
25. Pollard, J.A., Hawkins, J.D. and Arthur, M.W. (1999). Risk and protection: Are both necessary to understand diverse behavioral outcomes in adolescence? Social Work Research 23, 145-59.
26. Rutter, M., Giller, H. and Hagell, A. (1998). Antisocial behavior by young people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Stattin, H. and Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development 71, 1072-85.
28. Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., Farrington, D.P., Zhang, Q., Van Kammen, W.B. and Maguin, E. (1993). The double edge of protective and risk factors for delinquency: Interrelations and developmental patterns. Development and Psychopathology 5, 683-701.
29. Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., Wei, E.H., Farrington, D.P. and Wikström, P.-O.H. (2002). Risk and promotive effects in the explanation of persistent serious delinquency in boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 70, 111-23.
30. Van der Laan, A.M. and Blom, M. (2006). Jeugddelinquentie: Risico's en bescherming. Bevindingen uit de WODC Monitor Zelfgerapporteerde Jeugdcriminaliteit 2005 [Juvenile delinquency: Risks and protective measures. Findings of the 2005 WODC Youth Delinquency Survey]. The Hague: WODC [Research and Documentation Centre].
31. Van Widenfelt, B., Goedhart, A., Treffers, P.D.A. and Goodman, R. (2003). Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 12, 281-9.
32. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A.J., De Winter, A.F. and Ormel, J. (2006). Temperament, environment, and antisocial behavior in a population sample of preadolescent boys and girls. International Journal of Behavioral Development 30, 422-32.
33. Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Weerman, F.C., Smeenk, W., Slotboom, A., Harland, P., Den Dijker, L., Bijleveld, C. et al. (2003). De survey van het NSCR-schoolproject. Documentatie en tabellenboek van de eerste onderzoeksronde [Survey from the NISCALE school project. Documentation and book of tables from the first study round] (Rep. No. 2003-6). Leiden: NSCR [Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement].
35. Wikström, P.-O.H. (2005) The social origins of pathways in crime: Towards a developmental ecological action theory of crime involvement and its changes. In D. P. Farrington (ed.) Integrated developmental and life-course theories of offending, pp. 211-46. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
36. Wikström, P.-O.H. and Butterworth, D.A. (2006). Adolescent crime. Individual differences and lifestyles. Devon: Willan Publishing.
37. Wikström, P.-O.H. and Sampson, R.J. (2003). Social mechanisms of community influences on crime and pathways in criminality. In B. B. Lahey, T. E. Moffitt and A. Caspi (eds) Causes of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency, pp. 118-48. New York: Guilford Press.