From thought control to traffic control: CCTV politics of expansion and resistance in post-olympics Greece

Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance

Volumn 10, Issue , 2008, Pages 345-369

  Samatas, Minas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950693357     PISSN: 15216136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1521-6136(07)00216-3     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Abe, K. (2004). Everyday policing in Japan: Surveillance, media, Government and public opinion. International Sociology, 19(2), 215-231.
2. Alivizatos, N. (2004). Gimmicks for the cameras. Ta Nea, September 27, p. 6.
3. Ball, K., &Webster, Fr. (Eds)). (2003). The intensification of surveillance. London: Pluto.
4. Bunyan, T. (2005). While Europe sleeps. Spectrezine, December 5, 2005. Available at http://www.spectrezine.org
5. Coaffee, J. (2003). Terrorism, risk and the city: The making of a contemporary urban landscape. Aldershot: Ashgate.
6. Coleman, R. (2004). Reclaiming the streets: CCTV, neoliberalism and the mystification of social division in Liverpool, UK. Surveillance &Society, 2(2/3), 293-309. Available athttp://www.surveillance-and-society.org
7. Dubbeld, L. (2005). Protecting personal data in camera surveillance practices. Surveillance &Society, 2(4), 546-563. Available athttp://www.surveillance-and-society.org
8. Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and Privacy International (PI). (2006). Leading surveillance societies in the EU and the World, February 11 Available at http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml
9. European Commission for Democracy through Law or the ''Venice Commission'' Press release-496. (2007). Available at http://www.coe.int/t/dc/ press/
10. European Parliament. (2007). STOA report for Radio Frequency Identification Systems (RFID). Available at . pdf
11. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of prison. New York: Vintage.
12. Gallagher, C. (2004). CCTV and human rights. Surveillance &Society, 2(2/3), 270-292. http://www.surveillance-and-society.org
13. Garfinkel, S. (2000). Database nation: The death of privacy in the 21st century. New York: O'Reilly.
14. Gras, M. (2004). The legal regulation of CCTV in Europe. Surveillance &Society, 2(2/3), 216-229. Available at http://www.surveillance-and-society. org
15. Gray, M. (2003). Urban surveillance and panopticism: Will we recognize the facial recognition society? Surveillance &Society, 1(3), 314-330. http://www.surveillance-andsociety
16. Haggerty, K., &Ericson, R. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605-622.
17. Hellenic Data Protection Authority (DPA). (2000). Directive on CCTV systems, 1122- September 26. Available at http://www.dpa.gr/Documents/Eng/DIR. CCTV1122- 26.09.2000.doc
18. Hellenic Data Protection Authority (DPA) (2004). Opinion 4/May 3, and Decision 63/2004 on CCTV cameras on the Attica road network. http://www.dpa.gr/Documents/Eng/ CCTV%20cameras%20on%20the%20Atttica%20road%20network.Doc
19. Hellenic Data Protection Authority (DPA). (2005). CCTV Decisions: 58/2005, Aug. 12, 2005; No 3/2007, Jan. 12. 2007; No 31/2007 April 4, 2007; No 51/2007 June 20 http://www.dpa.gr/decision-eng.htm
20. Home Office Research Study. (2005). Assessing the impact of CCTV. Written by Gill M. &Spriggs A. No 292, February.
21. IOS reporters. (2007). Why cameras are burnt? The new constitutional article 1-1-4. Sunday Eleftherotypia, January 7.
22. Kim, K. J. (2004). Surveillance technology, privacy and social control. With reference to the case of electronic National Identification Card in South Korea. International Sociology, 19(2), 193-213.
23. Lianos, M. (2003). Social control after Foucault. Surveillance &Society, 1(3), 412-430. Available athttp://www.surveillance-and-society.org
24. Lyon, D. (2001). Surveillance society: Monitoring everyday life. London: Open University Press.
25. Lyon, D. (Ed.) 2003a). Surveillance as social sorting. London: Routledge.
26. Lyon, D. (2003b). Surveillance after September 11. London: Polity.
27. Maas, W. (2005). Freedom of movement inside 'fortress Europe'. In: E. Zureik &M. Salter (Eds)), Global surveillance and policing. Devon: Willan Publish.
28. Marx, G. (2002). What's new about the 'new surveillance'? Classifying for Change and Continuity. Surveillance &Society, 1(1), 9-29. Available at . Orghttp://www.surveillance-andsociety.Org
29. McCahill, M. (2002). The Surveillance web. Devon: Willan Publishing.
30. Monahan, T. (Ed.)). (2006). Surveillance and security. London: Routledge.
31. New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU). (1998). New York City: A surveillance camera town. NYCLU Special report, New York. December 13.
32. Norris, C., &Armstrong, G. (1999). The maximum surveillance society: The rise of CCTV. Oxford: Berg.
33. Papaioannou, K. (2007). Cameras and the arsonists of legality. Ta Nea, June 4, p. 6.
34. Privacy International. (2004). Condemnation of E.U. data sharing with US http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd[347]= x-347-72181 (February 1). Available at
35. Samatas, M. (1986). Greek McCarthyism: A comparative assessment of Greek post-civil war repressive anticommunism and the US Truman-McCarthy era. Journal of the Hellenic Diaspora, 13(3 &4), 5-75.
36. Samatas, M. (2003). Greece in 'Schengenland': Blessing or anathema for citizens and foreigners' rights? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29(1), 141-156.
37. Samatas, M. (2004). Surveillance in Greece: From anticommunist to the consumer surveillance. New York: Pella.
38. Samatas, M. (2005). Studying surveillance in Greece: Methodological and other problems related to an authoritarian surveillance culture. Surveillance &Society, 3(2/3), 181-197. Available athttp://www.surveillance-and-society. org
39. Samatas, M. (2006). From thought-control to the traffic-control: A comparison of traditional and new surveillance in Greece. Paper presented at the Crime, Justice and Surveillance Conference. Sheffield, April 5-6.
40. Samatas, M. (2007a). Security and surveillance in the Athens 2004 Olympics: Some lessons from a troubled story. International Criminal Justice Review, 17(3), 220-238.
41. Samatas, M. (2007b). Cameras for every illnessy Eleftherotypia, April 20, 2007, p. 10.
42. Samatas, M. (2008). A'Securitization' Policies of European Union and the Southern 'Fortress- Europe. In: T. Selwyn &M. Kousis (Eds)), Mediterranean contention, London: Pinter.
43. Schulhofer, St. J. (2002). The enemy within: Intelligence gathering, law enforcement, and civil liberties in the wake of September 1. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
44. Sidel, M. (2004). More secure, less free? Antiterrorist policy &liberties after September 11. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
45. Simon, B. (2005). The return of panopticism: Supervision, subjection and the new surveillance. Surveillance &Society, 3(1), 1-20. Available at
46. Statewatch News Online. (2004). EU-U.S.: The Passenger Name Record (PNR) Deal. April 2004. Available at http://www.statewatch.org/news/archive2004.htm
47. Sutton, A., &Wilson, D. (2004). Open-Street CCTV in Australia: The politics of Resistance and Expansion. Surveillance &Society, 2(2/3), 310-322. Available at http://www.surveillanceand-society.org
48. Walby, K. (2006). Little England? The rise of open-street CCTV surveillance in Canada. Surveillance &Society, 4(1/2), 29-51. Available at http://www.surveillance-and-society.org
49. Warren, R. (2004). City Streets: The war zones of globalization: democracy and military operation on urban terrain in the early 21st century. In: S. Graham (Ed.)), Cities, War and Terrorism. London: Blackwell.