Unimpaired trace classical eyeblink conditioning in Purkinje cell degeneration (pcd) mutant mice

Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Volumn 93, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 303-311

  Brown, Kevin L ^a   Agelan, Alexis ^a   Woodruff Pak, Diana S ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebellum; Eyeblink conditioning; Interpositus nucleus; Learning; Memory; Mutant mouse; Purkinje cell; Trace conditioning

Indexed keywords

ADULT ANIMAL; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL DEGENERATION; CEREBELLUM CORTEX; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYELID REFLEX; FOREBRAIN; HISTOLOGY; HOMOZYGOSITY; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MOUSE; MUTANT; NEUROANATOMY; NONHUMAN; PURKINJE CELL; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ANIMALS; BLINKING; CEREBELLUM; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; GENOTYPE; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, MUTANT STRAINS; NERVE DEGENERATION; PURKINJE CELLS;

EID: 77950690623     PISSN: 10747427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2009.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Aiba A., Kano M., Chen C., Stanton M.E., Fox G.D., Herrup K., et al. Deficient cerebellar long-term depression and impaired motor learning in mGluR1 mutant mice. Cell 1994, 79:377-388.
2. Bao S., Chen L., Qiao X., Knusel B., Thompson R.F. Impaired eye-blink conditioning in waggler, a mutant mouse with cerebellar BDNF deficiency. Learning and Memory 1998, 5:355-364.
3. Bao S., Chen L., Thompson R.F. Classical eyeblink conditioning in two strains of mice: Conditioned responses, sensitization, and spontaneous eyeblinks. Behavioral Neuroscience 1998, 112:714-718.
4. Buchanan S.L., Thompson R.H., Maxwell B.L., Powell D.A. Efferent connections of the medial prefrontal cortex in the rabbit. Experimental Brain Research 1994, 100:469-483.
5. Chen L., Bao S., Lockard J.M., Kim J.J., Thompson R.F. Impaired classical eyeblink conditioning in cerebellar-lesioned and Purkinje cell degeneration (pcd) mutant mice. The Journal of Neuroscience 1996, 16:2829-2838.
6. Chen L., Bao S., Thompson R.F. Bilateral lesions of the interpositus nucleus completely prevent eyeblink conditioning in Purkinje cell-degeneration mutant mice. Behavioral Neuroscience 1999, 113:204-210.
7. Chen G., Steinmetz J.E. A general-purpose computer system for behavioral conditioning and neural recording experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1998, 30:384-391.
8. Christian K.M., Thompson R.F. Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: Acquisition and retention. Learning and Memory 2003, 11:427-455.
9. Endo S., Shuto F., Le Dinh T., Okamoto T., Ikeda T., Suzuki M., et al. Dual involvement of G-substrate in motor learning revealed by gene deletion. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences USA 2009, 106:3525-3530.
10. Ewers M., Morgan D.G., Gordon M.N., Woodruff-Pak D.S. Associative and motor learning in 12month-old transgenic APP+PS1 mice. Neurobiology of Aging 2006, 27:1118-1128.
11. Gerwig M., Eβer A.C., Guberina H., Frings M., Kolb F.P., Forsting M., et al. Trace eyeblink conditioning in patients with cerebellar degeneration: Comparison of short and long trace intervals. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 187:85-96.
12. Gould T.J., Sears L.L., Steinmetz J.E. Possible CS and US pathways for rabbit classical eyelid conditioning: Electrophysiological evidence for projections from the pontine nuclei and inferior olive to cerebellar cortex and nuclei. Behavioral and Neural Biology 1993, 60:172-185.
13. Hansel C., Linden D.J., D'Angelo E. Beyond parallel fiber LTD: The diversity of synaptic and non-synaptic plasticity in the cerebellum. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:467-475.
14. 2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type IV/Gr-deficient mice. The Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 20:6459-6472.
15. Ivkovich D., Thompson R.F. Motor cortex lesions do not affect learning or performance of the eyeblink response in rabbits. Behavioral Neuroscience 1997, 111:727-738.
16. Kakegawa W., Miyazaki T., Emi K., Matsuda K., Kohda K., Motohashi J., et al. Differential regulation of synaptic plasticity and cerebellar motor learning by the C-terminal PDZ-binding motif of GluRδ2. The Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:1460-1468.
17. Kalmbach B.E., Ohyama T., Kreider J.C., Riusech F., Mauk M.D. Interactions between prefrontal cortex and cerebellum revealed by trace eyelid conditioning. Learning and Memory 2009, 16:86-95.
18. Kato Y., Takatsuki K., Kawahara S., Fukunaga S., Mori H., Mishina M., et al. N-Methyl-d-aspartate receptors play important roles in acquisition and expression of the eyeblink conditioned response in glutamate receptor subunit δ2 mutant mice. Neuroscience 2005, 135:1017-1023.
19. Kim J.J., Clark R.E., Thompson R.F. Hippocampectomy impairs the memory of recently, but not remotely, acquired trace eyeblink conditioned responses. Behavioral Neuroscience 1995, 109:195-203.
20. Kina S.-I., Tezuka T., Kusakawa S., Kishimoto Y., Kakizawa S., Hashimoto K., et al. Involvement of protein-tyrosine phosphatase PTPMEG in motor learning and cerebellar long-term depression. European Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 26:2269-2278.
21. Kishimoto Y., Fujimichi R., Araishi K., Kawahara S., Kano M., Aiba A., et al. MGluR1 in cerebellar Purkinje cells is required for normal association of temporally contiguous stimuli in classical conditioning. European Journal of Neuroscience 2002, 16:2416-2424.
22. Kishimoto Y., Hirono M., Sugiyama T., Kawahara S., Nakao K., Kishio M., et al. Impaired delay but normal trace eyeblink conditioning in PLCβ4 mutant mice. Neuroreport 2001, 12:2919-2922.
23. Kishimoto Y., Kano M. Endogenous cannabinoid signaling through the CB1 receptor is essential for cerebellum-dependent discrete motor learning. The Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:8829-8837.
24. Kishimoto Y., Kawahara S., Fujimichi R., Mori H., Mishina M., Kirino Y. Impairment of eyeblink conditioning in GluRδ2-mutant mice depends on the temporal overlap between conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. European Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 14:1515-1521.
25. Kishimoto Y., Kawahara S., Kirino Y., Kadotani H., Nakamura Y., Ikeda M., et al. Conditioned eyeblink response is impaired in mutant mice lacking NMDA receptor subunit NR2A. Neuroreport 1997, 8:3717-3721.
26. Kishimoto Y., Kawahara S., Suzuki M., Mori H., Mishinia M., Kirino Y. Classical conditioning in glutamate receptor subunit δ2 mutant mice is impaired in the delay paradigm but not in the trace paradigm. European Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 13:1249-1253.
27. Kishimoto Y., Nakazawa K., Tonegawa S., Kirino Y., Kano M. Hippocampal CA3 NMDA receptors are crucial for adaptive timing of trace eyeblink conditioned response. The Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:1562-1570.
28. Kleim J.A., Freeman J.H., Bruneau R., Nolan B.C., Cooper N.R., Zook A., et al. Synapse formation is associated with memory storage in the cerebellum. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences USA 2002, 99:13228-13231.
29. Kronforst-Collins M.A., Disterhoft J.F. Lesions of the caudal area of rabbit medial prefrontal cortex impair trace eyeblink conditioning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 1998, 69:147-162.
30. Lavond D.G., Steinmetz J.E. Acquisition of classical conditioning without cerebellar cortex. Behavioural Brain Research 1989, 33:113-164.
31. Lavond D.G., Steinmetz J.E., Yokaitis M.H., Thompson R.F. Reacquisition of classical conditioning after removal of cerebellar cortex. Experimental Brain Research 1987, 67:569-593.
32. Lee K.H., Chatila T.A., Ram R.A., Thompson R.F. Impaired memory of eyeblink conditioning in CaMKIZ KO mice. Behavioral Neuroscience 2009, 123:438-442.
33. Linden D.J., Connor J.A. Long-term synaptic depression. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1995, 18:319-357.
34. Mauk M.D., Steinmetz J.E., Thompson R.F. Classical conditioning using stimulation of the inferior olive as the unconditioned stimulus. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences USA 1986, 83:5349-5353.
35. McLaughlin J., Skaggs H., Churchwell J., Powell D.A. Medial prefrontal cortex and pavlovian conditioning: Trace versus delay conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience 2002, 116:37-47.
36. Moyer J.R., Deyo R.A., Disterhoft J.F. Hippocampectomy disrupts trace eye-blink conditioning in rabbits. Behavioral Neuroscience 1990, 104:243-252.
37. Mullen R.J., Eicher E.M., Sidman R.L. Purkinje cell degeneration, a new neurological mutation in the mouse. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences USA 1976, 73:208-212.
38. Nores W.L., Medina J.F., Steele P.M., Mauk M.D. Relative contributions of the cerebellar cortex and cerebellar nucleus to eyelid conditioning. Animal models 2000, Vol. 2:205-229. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. D.S. Woodruff-Pak, J.E. Steinmetz (Eds.).
39. Oakley D.A., Russell I.S. Neocortical lesions and Pavlovian conditioning. Physiology and Behavior 1972, 8:915-926.
40. Ohno M., Tseng W., Silva A.J., Disterhoft J.F. Trace eyeblink conditioning requires the hippocampus but not autophosphorylation of alphaCaMKII in mice. Learning and Memory 2005, 12:211-215.
41. Ohyama T., Nores W.L., Medina J.F., Riusech F.A., Mauk M.D. Learning-induced plasticity in deep cerebellar nucleus. The Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:12656-12663.
42. Oswald B., Knuckley B., Mahan K., Snaders C., Powell D.A. Prefrontal control of trace versus delay eyeblink conditioning: Role of the unconditioned stimulus in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Behavioral Neuroscience 2006, 120:1033-1042.
43. Pakaprot N., Kim S., Thompson R.F. The role of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus in short and long term memory for trace eyeblink conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience 2009, 123:54-61.
44. Perrett S.P., Mauk M.D. Extinction of conditioned eyelid responses requires the anterior lobe of cerebellar cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 1995, 15:2074-2080.
45. Perrett S.P., Ruiz B.P., Mauk M.D. Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses. The Journal of Neuroscience 1993, 13:1708-1718.
46. Plakke B., Freeman J.H., Poremba A. Metabolic mapping of the rat cerebellum during delay and trace eyeblink conditioning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 2007, 88:11-18.
47. Pugh J.R., Raman I.M. Potentiation of mossy fiber EPSCs in the cerebellar nuclei by NMDA receptor activation followed by postinhibitory rebound current. Neuron 2006, 51:113-123.
48. Raman I.M., Sprunger L.K., Meisler M.H., Bean B.P. Altered subthreshold sodium currents and disrupted firing patterns in Purkinje neurons of Scn8a mutant mice. Neuron 1997, 19:881-891.
49. Schmaltz L.W., Theios J. Acquisition and extinction of a classically conditioned response in hippocampectomized rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1972, 79:328-333.
50. Shibuki K., Gomi H., Chen L., Bao S., Kim J.J., Wakatsuki H., et al. Deficient long-term depression, impaired eyeblink conditioning, and normal motor coordination in GFAP mutant mice. Neuron 1996, 16:587-599.
51. Solomon P.R., Solomon S.D., Vander Schaff E., Perry H.E. Altered activity in the hippocampus is more detrimental to classical conditioning than removing the structure. Science 1983, 220:329-331.
52. Solomon P.R., Vander Schaaf E.R., Thompson R.F., Weisz D.J. Hippocampus and trace conditioning of the rabbit's classically conditioned nictitating membrane response. Behavioral Neuroscience 1986, 100:729-744.
53. Steinmetz J.E., Lavond D.G., Thompson R.F. Classical conditioning in rabbits using pontine nucleus stimulation as a conditioned stimulus and inferior olive stimulation as an unconditioned stimulus. Synapse 1989, 3:225-233.
54. Steinmetz J.E., Logan C.G., Rosen D.J., Thompson J.K., Lavond D.G., Thompson R.F. Initial localization of the acoustic conditioned stimulus projection system to the cerebellum essential for classical eyelid conditioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences USA 1987, 84:3531-3535.
55. Steinmetz J.E., Rosen D.J., Chapman P.F., Lavond D.G., Thompson R.F. Classical conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response with a mossy-fiber stimulation CS: I pontine nuclei and middle cerebellar peduncle stimulation. Behavioral Neuroscience 1986, 100:878-887.
56. Steinmetz J.E., Sengelaub D.R. Possible conditioned stimulus pathway for classical eyelid conditioning in rabbits. Behavioral and Neural Biology 1992, 57:103-115.
57. Tanaka M., Yamaguchi K., Tatsukawa T., Nishioka C., Nishiyama H., Theis M., et al. Lack of connexin43-mediated Bergmann glial gap junctional coupling does not affect cerebellar long-term depression, motor coordination, or eyeblink conditioning. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 2008, 2:1-14.
58. Thompson R.F. The neurobiology of learning and memory. Science 1986, 233:941-947.
59. Tracy J.A., Thompson J.K., Krupa D.J., Thompson R.F. Evidence of plasticity in the pontocerebellar conditioned stimulus pathway during classical conditioning of the eyeblink response in the rabbit. Behavioral Neuroscience 1998, 112:267-285.
60. Tseng W., Guan R., Disterhoft J.F., Weiss C. Trace eyeblink conditioning is hippocampally dependent in mice. Hippocampus 2004, 14:58-65.
61. Vogel R.W., Ewers M., Ross C., Gould T.J., Woodruff-Pak D.S. Age-related impairment in the 250-millisecond delay eyeblink classical conditioning procedure in C57BL/6 mice. Learning and Memory 2002, 9:321-336.
62. Weible A.P., McEchron M.D., Disterhoft J.F. Cortical involvement in acquisition and extinction of trace eyeblink conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience 2000, 114:1058-1067.
63. Weible A.P., Weiss C., Disterhoft J.F. Activity profiles of single neurons in caudal anterior cingulate cortex during trace eyeblink conditioning in the rabbit. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 90:599-612.
64. Weible A.P., Weiss C., Disterhoft J.F. Connections of the caudal anterior cingulate cortex in rabbit: Neural circuitry participating in the acquisition of trace eyeblink conditioning. Neuroscience 2007, 145:288-302.
65. Weiss C., Sametsky E., Sasse A., Spiess J., Disterhoft J.F. Acute stress facilitates trace eyeblink conditioning in C57BL/6 mice and increases the excitability of their CA1 pyramidal neurons. Learning and Memory 2005, 12:138-143.
66. Weisz D.J., McInerney J. An associative process maintains reflex facilitation of the unconditioned nictitating membrane response during the early stages of training. Behavioral Neuroscience 1990, 104:21-27.
67. Woodruff-Pak D.S., Disterhoft J. Where is the trace in trace conditioning?. Trends in Neurosciences 2008, 31:105-112.
68. Woodruff-Pak D.S., Green J.T., Levin S.I., Meisler M.H. Inactivation of sodium channel Scn8A (Nav1.6) in Purkinje neurons impairs learning in Morris water maze and delay but not trace eyeblink classical conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience 2006, 120:229-240.
69. Woodruff-Pak D.S., Lavond D.G., Thompson R.F. Trace conditioning: Abolished by cerebellar nuclear lesions but not lateral cerebellar cortex aspirations. Brain Research 1985, 348:249-260.
70. Yeo C.H., Hardimann M.J., Glickstein M. Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit II. Lesions of the cerebellar cortex. Experimental Brain Research 1985, 60:99-113.