Developments in the debate on nanoethics: Traditional approaches and the need for new kinds of analysis

NanoEthics

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 27-52

  Ferrari, Arianna ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ethical aspects of nanotechnology; Metaphysical research program; Nanoethics; Responsible development of nanotechnology

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950689495     PISSN: 18714757     EISSN: 18714765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11569-009-0081-z     Document Type: Article

References (173)

1. Allhoff F (2007) On the autonomy and justification of nanoethics. In: Nanoethics 1(3): 185-210
2. Allhoff F, Lin P (2006) What's so special about nanotechnology and nanoethics? Introductory paper to nanoethics symposium published in. Int J Appl Philos 20 (2):179-190
3. Allhoff F, Lin P (2008) Nanotechnology and society. Current and emerging ethical issues. Springer, Dordrecht 4.
4. Bachmann G (1998) Innovationsschub aus dem Nano-kosmos. Technologieanalyse. VDI- Technologiezentrum, Düsseldorf
5. Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (2004) Discovering the nanoscale. IOS, Amsterdam
6. Ball P (2003) Nanoethics and the purpose of new technologies. Talk delivered at "Material Choices" Symposium, Royal Society For Arts, London, March 2003
7. Barnett J, Carr A, Clift R (2006) Going public: risk, trust and public understanding of nanotechnologies. In: Hunt G, Mehta M (eds) Nanotechnology, risk and law. Earth-scan, UK and USA, pp 196-212
8. Bensaude-Vincent B (2004) Two cultures of nanotechnology? In: HYLE 10, 2: 65-82
9. Bensaude-Vincent B (2006) Self-assembly, self-organization: A philosophical perspective on converging technologies. Paper prepared for France/Stanford Meeting in Avignon, December 2006, Draft. http://www.u-paris10.fr/servlet/com.univ.collaboratif.utils.LectureFichiergw
10. Bensaude-Vincent B (2009) Les vertiges de la technoscience. Editions La Découverte, Paris
11. Berne RW (2005) Nanoethics. In: Mitcham C (ed) Encyclopedia of science, technology and ethics, vol. 3. Thomson-Gale, Detroit, pp 1259-1262
12. Berube D (2009) Public perception of nano-a summary of findings, 20 october 2009, http://nanohype.blogspot.com/
13. BIAC Expert Group on Nanotechnologies (2009) Responsible development of nanotechnology: turning vision into reality, BIAC expert group on nanotechnologies vision paper, http://www.biac.org/statements/nanotech/FIN09-01_Nanotechnology_Vision_Paper.pdf
14. Bond P (2004) Vision for converging technologies and future society. In: Roco M, Montemagno C (eds) The coevolution of human potential and converging technologies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1013: 17-24
15. Bostrom N (2007) Technological revolutions: ethics and policy in the dark. In: Cameron NM, Mitchell EM (eds) Nanoscale: issues and perspectives for the nano century. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 129-152
16. Bostrom N, Ord T (2006) The reversal test: eliminating status quo bias in applied ethics. In: Ethics 116: 656-679
17. Braithwaite V, Levi M (eds) (1998) Trust and governance. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
18. Brown N, Rip A, van Lente H (2003) Expectation In and About Science and Technology: a background paper for the expectations workshop 13-14 June 2003, http://209.85.129.132/search?q=cache:o2RgVoVarFcJ:www.york.ac.uk/res/satsu/expectations/Utrecht%25202003/Background%2520paper%2520version%252014May03.pdf+nanotechnology+ideograph+rip&cd=3&hl=it&ct=clnk&gl=it
19. Browne W R, Feringa WL (2006) Making molecular nano-machines work. In: Nature Nanotechnology 1(I1): 25-35
20. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (2004a) Nanotechnologie. Innovationen für die Welt von morgen. Bonifatius GmbH, Bonn
21. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (2004b) Nanotechnologie erobert Märkte. Deutsche Zukunftsoffensive für Nanotechnologie. Bonifatius GmbH, Bonn
22. Cameron NM (2007) Toward nanoethics? In: Cameron NM, Mitchell EM (eds) Nanoscale: issues and perspectives fort he nano century. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 281-294
23. Campbell P (2003) Nanotech, uncertainty and the publics, Talk at a symposium on nanotechnology at ZKM, the Art and Media Museum, Karlsruhe, Germany, June 13, 2003, http://www.euroscience.net/article1.html
24. Cobb MD, Macoubrie J (2004) Public perceptions about nanotechnology. Risks, benefits, & trust. J Nano Res 6:395- 405
25. Coenen C (2005) NanoEthics conference at the University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA, March 2-5, 2005. Conference Report. In: Technikfolgenabschätzung. Theorie und Praxis 2(14):116-120, http://www.itas.fzk.de/tatup/052/coen05a.htm
26. Coenen C, Fleischer T, Rader M (2004) Of visions, dreams, and nightmares: the debate on converging technologies. Report on the Conference "Converging Technologies for a Diverse Europe", Brussels September 14-15, 2004. In: Technikfolgenabschätzung-Theorie und Praxis, Nr. 3(13): 118-125; http://www.itas.fzk.de/tatup/043/coua04a.htm
27. COMEST (2005) The precautionary principle. Report of the expert group on the precautionary principle commission on the ethics of scientific knowledge and technology. Geneva, Unesco
28. Comité Consultatif National d'Ethique pour la Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé (CCNE) (2007) AVIS N°96-Questions éthiques posées par les nanosciences, les nanotechnologies et la santé, http://www.ccne-ethique.fr/francais/start.htm
29. Commission de l'éthique la Science et de la technologie (2006) Éthique et Nanotechnologies: se donner les moyens d'agir, Québec-Nov. 2006, http://www.ethique.gouv.qc.ca/fr/ftp/Nano_Web_BD.pdf
30. Commission de l'Éthique de la Science et de la Technologie (2008) Ethics, risk, and nanotechnology: responsible approaches to dealing with risk. In: Allhoff F, Lin P (eds) Nanotechnology and society. Current and emerging ethical issues. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 75-89
31. Corley EA et al (2009) Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology. In: Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 17 June 2009, http://www.springerlink.com/content/627323076677745q/fulltext.html
32. Crandall BC (ed) (1996) Nanotechnology: molecular speculations on global abundance. MIT, Cambridge
33. Davies S et al (2009) Reconfiguring responsiility: lessons for public policy (Part 1 of the report on deepening the debate on nanotechnology). Duhram University, Duhram
34. Drexler E (1986) Engines of creation the coming era of nanotechnology. Anchor Books, USA
35. Dupont, Environmental Defense (2007) Nano risk framework. June 2007, http://www.edf.org/documents/6496_Nano%20Risk%20Framework.pdf
36. Dupuy J-P (2000) The mechanization of mind: on the origins of cognitive science. Princeton University Press, Princeton
37. Dupuy J-P (2002) Pour une catastrophisme eclairé. Editions du Seuil, France
38. Dupuy J-P (2004a) Complexity and uncertainty: a prudential approach to nanotechnology. In: Sanco, European Commission (Community Health and Consumer Protection) (2004) Nanotechnologies: A Preliminary Risk Analysis on the Basis of a Workshop, Brussels, 1-2 March 2004: 71-93, (www.europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/documents/ev_20040301_en.pdf)
39. Dupuy J-P (2004b) Do we shape technologies or do they shape us?, Proceedings of the Conference "Converging technologies for a diverse Europe", September 2004, European Commission, Brussels. ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/foresight/docs/ntw_22_dupuy_text.pdf
40. Dupuy J-P (2007) Some pitfalls in the philosophical foundations of nanoethics. In: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32(3): 237-261
41. Dupuy J-P (2009) "Preface to the new edition": the mechanization of mind: on the origins of cognitive science. Princeton, Princeton University Press
42. Dupuy J-P, Grinbaum A (2004) Living with uncertainty: toward the ongoing normative. Assessment of Nanotechnology. In: Techné 8: 4-25
43. Ebbesen M, Andersen S, Besenbacher F (2006) Ethics in nanotechnology: starting from scratch? In Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 26: 451-462
44. EGE (2006) Nanomedicine. Nanotechnology for health. European technology platform, stretegy research agenda for nanomedicine, November 2006, Belgium: European Commission
45. ETC Group (2003a) The big down: technologies converging at the nano-scale, www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/54/02/com8788specialpnanomar-jun05eng.pdf
46. ETC (2003b) Size matters. The call for a global moratorium, http://www.etcgroup.org/en/materials/publications.html?pub_id=165
47. ETC Group (2004) Down on the farm. The impact of nano-scale technologies on food and agriculture, http://www.tcgroup.org/en/materials/publications.html?pub_id=80
48. ETC Group (2005) Nanotech's "Second Nature" patents: implications for the global south, http://www.etcgroup.org/en/materials/publications.html?pub_id=53
49. ETC Group (2007) Broad international coalition issues urgent call for strong oversight of nanotechnology. press release, http://www.etcgroup.org/en/issues/nanotechnology.html
50. European Commission (2004) Towards a European strategy for nanotechnology, communication from the Commission. Brussels, European Communities, Report. European Commission, Brussels, ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/nano_com_en.pdf
51. European Commission (2008) A code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research, A Commission Recommendation of 07/02/2008; http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/index_en.html (last accessed 05/28/09)
52. Felt U et al (2007) Taking European knowledge society seriously, Directorate General for Research, European Commission. http://cps.fns.uniba.sk/veda/files/european-knowledge-society_en.pdf
53. Ferrari A (2008) Is it all about human nature? The ethical challenges of converging technologies beyond a polarized debate. In: Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research 1(21): 1-24
54. Ferrari A (2009a) Controlling the ethics of nanorisks. In: Arnaldi S, Lorenzet A, Russo F (eds) Managing the uncertainty of nanotechnology: ethics, policy and public engagement. IOS, Amsterdam
55. Ferrari A (2009b) The Nano-control freak: multi-faceted strategies for taming nature. In: Kjolberg K, Wickson F (eds) Nano goes Macro-Social Perspectives on Nano-scaled Sciences & Technologies, Pan Stanford (in press)
56. Ferrari A (2010) Visions of a better world in nanotechnologies. In: Ferrari A, Gammel S (eds) Visionen der nanotechnologie. AKA Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 203-227
57. Ferrari A, Nordmann A (2009) Reconfiguring responsibility: lessons for nanoethics (Part 2 of the report on deepening the debate on nanotechnology). Duhram University, Duhram
58. Foladori G, Invernizzi N (2005) Nanotechnology in its socio-economic context. In: Science Studies 18, 2: 67-73
59. Foladori G, Invernizzi N (2006) Nanotecnologías disruptivas. Implicaciones sociales de las nanotecnologías. Miguel Ángel Porrúa and Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas
60. Foladori G, Invernizzi N (2008) The workers' push to democratize nanotechnology. In: Fisher E et al (eds) The yearbook of nanotechnology in society 1: 23-36 (originally posted at http://www.estudiosdeldesarrollo.net/relans/documentos/UITA-English-1.pdf
61. Friends of the Earth (2007) Nanotechnology policy statement. http://nano.foe.org.au/filestore2/download/94/FoEA%20Nanotechnology%20Policy%20May%202006.pdf
62. Fukuyama F (2002) Our posthuman future. The consequences of the biotechnology revolution. Profile Books, Chicago
63. Gavelin K, Wilson R, Doubleday R (2007) Democratic technologies? Final report of the Nanotechnology Engagement Group (NEG), Involve, London, http://www.involve.org.uk/assets/Publications/Democratic-Technologies.pdf
64. Goodsell DS (2004) Bionanotechnology: lessons from nature. Wiley-Liss Inc, Hoboken
65. Gordijn B (2006) Nanoethik-eine Neufassung der Debatte. In: Nordmann A, Schummer J, Schwarz A (eds) Nanotechnologien im Kontext. Philosophische, ethische und gesellschaftliche Perspektiven. Akademische Verlagsgesell-schaft, Berlin, pp 311-323
66. Gordon R (2007) Reasoning about the future of nanotechnology. In: Cameron NM, Ellen MM (eds) Nanoscale. Issues and perspectives for the nanocentury. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 97-114
67. Gould KA (2005) Small, not beautiful: nanotechnology and the treadmill of production. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Marriott Hotel, Loews Philadelphia Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 12, 2005, http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p18495_index.html
68. Gould KA, Pellow DN, Schnaiberg A (2003) Interrogating the treadmill of production: everything you wanted to know about the treadmill, but were afraid to ask. Revised paper from Madison Symposium on the Treadmill of Production, http://www.northwestern.edu/ipr/publications/papers/2004/schnaiberg/21_InterrogatingTreadmill.pdf
69. Greenpeace (2007) Nanotechnology policy and position paper, http://www.greenpeace.org/denmark/press/rapporter-og-dokumenter/nanotechnology-policy-positi
70. Grunwald A (2004a) Vision assessment as a new element of technology future analysis tool-box. In: Proceedings of the EU-US Scientific Seminar: New Technology foresight, forecasting & assessment methods, Seville, May 13-14 2004
71. Grunwald A (2004b) Ethische Aspekte der Nanotechnologie. Eine Felderkundung, In: Technikfolgenabschätzung 2(13): 71-78
72. Grunwald A (2005) Nanotechnology-a new field of ethical enquiry? In: Science and Engineering Ethics 11, 2: 187-201
73. Grunwald A (2006) Nanotechnologie als Chiffre der Zukunft. In: Nordmann A, Schummer J, Schwarz A (eds) Nanotechnologien im Kontext. Philosophische, ethische und gesellschaftliche Perspektiven. Akademische Verlagsgesell-schaft, Berlin, pp 49-80
74. Grunwald A (2008) Auf dem Weg in eine nanotechnolo-gische Zukunft. Philosophisch-ethische Fragen. Freiburg I.B.: Karl Alber
75. Harremoës P et al (2002) The precautionary principle in the 20th century: late lessons from early warnings. Earthscan, London
76. Harris J (2007) Enhancing evolution? The ethical case for making better people. Princeton University Press, Princeton
77. Harris J, Chan S (2006) Cognitive regeneration or enhancement: the ethical issues. In: Regenerative Medicine 1(3): 361-366
78. HLEG (2004) Converging technologies-shaping the future of European societies, a report to the European Commission Rappeurteur: Alfred Nordmann
79. Holm S, Harris J (1999) Precautionary principle stifles discovery. In: Nature 400: 398
80. Hull G (2007) Normative aspects of a "Substantive" precautionary principle. In: Social Science and Research Network (SSRN) available at: http://www.SSRN_ID1013357_code861170.pdf
81. Hullmann V (2008) Europeanactivities in thefield of ethical, legal and social aspects (ELSA) and governance of nanotechnology, ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/elsa_governance_nano.pdf
82. Hunt G (2006) Nanotechnoscience and complex systems: the case for nanology. In: Hunt G, Mehta M (eds) Nanotechnology. Risks, ethics and law. Earthscan, UK and USA, pp 43-58
83. Invernizzi N, Foladori G, Maclurcan D (2008) Nanotechnology's controversial role for the south. In: Science Technology Society 13: 123-148
84. IUF (IUF (International Union of Food, Agricultural Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers' Association) (2007) Resolution on nanotechnologies at the IUF Congress meeting in Geneva. March 19-22, 2007, http://www.iuf.org
85. James HS, Marks LA (2008) Trust and distrust in biotechnology risk managers: Insights from the United Kingdom, 1996-2002. In: AgBioForum 11(2): 93-105, http://www.agbioforum.org/v11n2/v11n2a03-james.htm
86. Janich P (2006) Wissenschaftstheorie der Nanotechnologie. In: Nordmann A, Schummer J, Schwarz A (eds) Nanotechnologien im Kontext. Philosophische, ethische und gesellschaftliche Perspektiven. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin, pp 1-32
87. Kaiser M (2009) Visionen der Öffentlichkeit als Elemente nanotechnologischer Identitätsarbeit In: Ferrari A, Gammel S. Visionen der
88. Kearnes M (2009) Nanotechnology and the constitution of the social. In: Ferrari A, Gammel S. Visionen der Nanotechnologie. Heidelberg Aka Verlag: 187-201
89. Kearnes M, Rip A (2009) The emerging governance landscape of nanotechnology. In: Gammel S, Lösch A, Nordmann A (eds) Jenseits von Regulierung: Zum politischen Umgang mit der Nanotechnologie. Aka Verlag, Heidelberg
90. Kearnes M et al (2006) Governing at the nanoscale: people, policies and emerging technologies. Demos, London
91. Keiper A (2007) Nanoethics as a discipline? In: The new Atlantis. A Journal of Technology & Science: 55-67, http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/nanoethics-as-a-discipline
92. Khushf G (2004) The ethics of nanotechnology. Vision and Values for a New Generation of Science and Engineering. In: National Academy of Engineering (ed.) Emerging Technologies and Ethical Issues in Engineering. Papers from a Workshop, October 14-15, 2003E. The National Academies Press; http://books.nap.edu/books/030909271X/html/29.html#pagetop
93. Kjolberg K, Wickson F (2007) Social and ethical interactions with nano: mapping the early literature. In: Nanoethics 1: 89-104
94. Kurzweil R (2003) Testimony to the US house of representatives committee on science, full science, hearing on thesocietal implications of nanotechnology, April 9,2003 http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/science/hearings/full03/apr09/kurzweil.pdf
95. Lee R, Jose D (2008) Self-interest, self-restraint and corporate responsibility for nanotechnologies: emerging dilemmas for modern managers. Technol Anal Strat Manag 20(1):113-125
96. Macoubrie J (2005) Informed public perception of nano and trust in government. Chigago: Woodrow Wilson Center www.wilsoncenter.org/news/docs/macoubriereport.pdf
97. Macoubrie J (2006) Nanotechnology: public concerns, reasoning, and trust in government. Public Underst Sci 15 (2):221-241
98. Meyerson E, Sipfle MA, Sipfle D (1991) Explanation in the sciences. Springer, Boston
99. Miller G (2008) Nanotechnology and the public interest: Repeating the mistakes of GM foods? In: International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation 7 (2-3): 274-280
100. Mnyusiwalla A, Daar AS, Singer PA (2003) Mind the gap. Science and ethics in nanotechnology. In: Nanotechnology 14: R9-R13
101. Moor J, Weckert J (2004) Nanoethics: assessing the nanoscale from an ethical point of view. In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (eds) Discovering the nano-scale. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 301-310
102. NanoAction (2007) Principles for the oversight of nanotechnologies and nanomaterials, http://www.nanoaction.org/nanoaction/index.cfm
103. NanoFraming (2009) FramingNano mapping study on regulation and governance of nanotechnologies, www.framingnano.eu
104. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine (1995) The national academy press on being a scientist: responsible conduct in research, Second Edition
105. National Research Council (2006) A matter of size. Triennial review of the national nanotechnology initiative
106. National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) (1999) Shaping the world atom by atom, http://itri.loyola.edu/nano/IWGN.Public.Brochure
107. National Science and Technology Council (NSCT) (2000) National nanotechnology initiative: The initiative and its implementation plan. Washington, DC
108. National Science Foundation (NSF) (2006) Nanotechnology definition. National Science Foundation, Varlington VA, http://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/nano/reports/omb_nifty50.jsp
109. Nordmann A (2004) Collapse of distance. Epistemic strategies of science and technoscience, http://www.unibielefeld.de/ZIF/FG/2006Application/PDF/Nordmann_essay2.pdf
110. Nordmann A (2005) Noumenal technology: reflections on the incredible tininess of nano. In: Techné 8: 1-20
111. Nordmann A (2007a) No future for nanotechnology? Historical development vs. global expansion. In: Jotterand F (ed) Nanotechnology and nanoethics: framing the field. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 43-63
112. Nordmann A (2007b) Design choices in the nanoworld: a space odyssey. In: Deblonde M, Goorden L et al.: Nano researchers facing choices. In: Timmerman C, Segaert B (eds) The Dialogue Series, Universitair Centrum Sint-Ignatius Antwerpen 10: 13-30
113. Nordmann A (2007c) If and then: a critique of speculative NanoEthics. In Nanoethics 1.1: 31-46
114. Nordmann A, Schwarz AE (2009) The lure of the "yes": The seductive power of technoscience. In: Kaiser M, Kurath M, Maasen S, Rehmannn-Sutter C (eds) Assessment Regimes of Technology. Regulation, Deliberation & Identity Politics of Nanotechnology. Dordrecht, NL: Springer
115. Nordmann A, Rip A (2009) Mind the gap revisited. In: Nature nanotechnology, 4: 273-274
116. PEN (The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies) (2008) Europe spends nearly twice as much as U.S. on Nanotech risk research. In: PEN News, 19 April 2008, http://www.nanotechproject.org/news/archive/ehs-update/
117. Pereira AG, Schomberg R, Funtowicz S (2007) Foresight knowledge assessment. In: International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy (IJFIP) 3(1): 53-75
118. Petersen A, Anderson A (2007) A question of balance or blind faith?: Scientists' and science policymakers' representations of the benefits and risks of nanotechnologies. In: NanoEthics 1: 243-256
119. Peterson M (2007) The precautionary principle should not be used as a basis for decision-making. In: EMBO Reports 8,4: 305-308
120. Phoenix C, Treder M (2003) Applying the precautionary principle to nanotechnology. The Centre for Responsible Nanotechnology, January, 2003, http://www.crnano.org/precautionary.htm
121. Pidgeon N et al (2008) Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United states and United Kingdom, Nature Nanotechnology. Published Online, 7(December)
122. Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF (2003) Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. In: Risk Analysis 23 (5): 961-972
123. Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF (2005) Trust in risk regulation: cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food? In: Risk Analysis 25, 1: 199-209
124. Popper K (1992) Quantum theory and the schism in physics. From the postscript to the logic of scientific discovery. Routledge, London
125. Powell MC (2007) New risk or old risk, high risk or no risk? How scientists' standpoints shape their nanotechnology risk frames. In: Health Risk Soc 9(2):173-190
126. President's Council of Bioethics (2003) Beyond therapy. Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. Washington DC. Available at http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/beyondtherapy/index.html
127. Putnam H (1994) Ethics without ontology. Harvard University Press, Harvard
128. Rip A (2001) Contributions from social studies of science and constructive technology assessment. In: Stirling A (ed) On Science and Precaution in the Management of Technological Risk. Volume II. Case Studies. Sevilla: institute for prospective technology studies (European Commission Joint Research Centre), November 2001: 94-122
129. Rip A (2002) Challenges for technology foresight/assessment and governance, final report of the STRATA consolidating wokshop. Brussel: European Commission, ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/improving/docs/sstp_strata_workshop_session2_final.pdf
130. Rip A (2005) Technology assessment as part of the co-evolution of nanotechnology and society: the thrust of the TA Program in NanoNed, Conference on "Nanotechnology in Science, Economy and Society", Marburg, 13-15 January, http://www.nanoandsociety.com/ourlibrary/documents/NanNed.pdf
131. Rip A (2006) The tension between fiction and precaution in nanotechnology. In: Fisher E, Jones J, Schomberg R (eds) Implementing the precautionary principle. Perspectives and prospects. Edwar Elgar, Cheltentham
132. Rip A (2008a) A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance- and its ironies. In: Voss JP, Kemp R (eds) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar Publishing
133. Rip A (2008b) Discourse and practice of responsible nanotechnology development, http://www.mbs.ac.uk/research/innovation/documents/ManchesterSept08ArieRip.ppt
134. Rip A, Shelley-Egan C (2010) Positions and responsibilities in the 'real' world of nanotechnology. In: von Schomberg R, Davies S (eds) Understanding public debate on nanotechnologies: options for framing public policies: Aworking document by the services of the European Commission. European Commission, Brussels
135. Roco M, Bainbridge W (eds) (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance: nanotechnology. Biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. National Science Foundation, Arlington
136. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (2008) Novel materials in the environment: the case of nanotechnology. HMSO, London
137. Royal Society (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. London: Royal Society. http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm
138. Sandler R (2009) Nanotechnology: the social and ethical issues. PEN 16. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center, Project on Emerging Technologies
139. Sandler R, Cafaro P (2005) Environmental virtue ethics. Rowman & Littlefield, New York
140. Sarewitz D et al (2004) Science policy in its social context. In: Philosophy Today, Supplement: 67-83
141. Schmid G et al (2003) Small dimensions and material properties. A definition of Nanotechnology. Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler: Europäische Akademie, Graue Reihe, Nr. 35, available at: http://www.ea-aw.de/susanis/presse/pressemeldung.php_id=2.html
142. Schomberg R (2007) From the ethics of technology to the ethics of knowledge assessment. In: Goujon P et al (eds) The information society: innovation, legitimacy, ethics and democracy. Springer, Boston, pp 39-55
143. Schummer J (2004) Societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology: meanings, interest groups, and social dynamics. In: Techné-Research in Philosophy and Technology, 8, 2 (2004): 56-87 (reprinted in: J. Schummer, Baird D. (eds.): Nanotechnology Challenges: Implications for Philosophy, Ethics and Society, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2006: 413-449)
144. Schummer J (2006) Cultural diversity in nanotechnology ethics. In: Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 31: 217-230
145. Schummer J (2007a) Identifying ethical issues of nanotechnologies. In: ten Have HAMJ (ed) Nanotechnologies, ethics and politics. UNESCO, Paris, pp 79-98
146. Schummer J (2007) The impact of nanotechnologies on developing countries. In: Allhoff F, Lin P, Moor J, Weckert J (eds) Nanoethics: examining the social impact of nanotechnology. Wiley, Hoboken
147. Schummer J (2008) Cultural diversity in nanotechnology ethics. In: Allhoff F, Lin P (eds) Nanotechnology and society. Current and emerging ethical issues. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 265-280
148. Schummer J (2009) Nanotechnologie: Spiele mit Grenzen. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
149. Schwarz A (2004) Shrinking the ecological footprint with NanoTechnoScience? In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (eds) Discovering the nanoscale. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 203-208
150. Shrader-Frechette K (2007) Nanotoxicology and ethical conditions for informed consent. In: Nanoethics 1: 47-56
151. Siegrist M et al (2007) Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust. In: Appetite 49(2): 459-466
152. Spagnolo A, Daloiso V (2009) Outlining ethical issues in nanotechnologies. In: Bioethics 23(7): 394-402
153. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2007) Virtue ethics, Stanford University, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/
154. Stirling A (2007) Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy. In: EMBO Reports 8(4): 309-315
155. Strand (2001) ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/nanostag-elsa.pdf
156. Sunstein CR (2005) Laws of fear: beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
157. Susanne C, Casado M, Buxo MJ (2005) What challenges offers nanotechnology to bioethics? In: Law and the human genome review 22: 27-45
158. Swiestra T, Rip A (2007) Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology. In: Nanoethics 1(1): 3-20
159. SWISS RE (2004) Small matters. Many unknowns. Available at http://www.swissre.com/pws/research%20publications/risk%20and%20expertise/risk%20perception/nanotechnology%20-%20small%20matter%20many%20unknowns%20pdf%20page.html
160. Tickner J (1999) A map toward precautionary decision-making. In: Raffensperger C, Tickner J (eds) Protecting public health and the environment: implementing the precautionary principle. Island, Washington
161. UNESCO (2006) The ethics and politics of nanotechnology. UNESCO, Geneva
162. Van Lente H (2000) Forceful futures: from promise to requirement. In: Brown N, Rappert B, Webster A (eds) Contested futures: a sociology of prospective techno-science. Aldershot, Ashgate, pp 43-63
163. Van Lente H, Rip A (1998) Expectations in technological developments: an example of prospective structures to be filled in by agency. In: Disco C, van der Meulen BJR (eds) Getting new technologies together. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 195-220
164. Walker RL, Ivanhoe PJ (eds) (2007) Working virtue. Oxford University Press, Oxford
165. What Do You Care What Other People Think?: Further Adventures of a Curious Character by Richard Feynman (1988)
166. Wickson F (2008) Narratives of nature and nanotechnology. In: Nature Nanotechnology 3: 313-315
167. Wilsdon J, Willis R (2004) See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. Demos, London
168. Woods S, Jones R, Geldart A (2003) The social and economic challenges of nanotechnology. UK: Report to the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). ESRC, London
169. Wullweber J (2006) Der mythos nanotechnologie. Die Entstehung einer neuen Inwertsetzungstechnologie. In: Peripherie-Zeitschrift für Politik und Ökonomie, 101/102: 99-118
170. Wullweber J (2008) Nanotechnology-an empty signifier à venir? A delineation of a techno-socio-economical Innovation Strategy. Iin: Science, Technology and Innovation Studies 4 (1): 27-45
171. Wynne B (2001) Creating public alienation: expert discourse of risk and ethics on GMOs. In: Science as Culture 10(1): 1-40
172. Wynne B (2006) What could the Foundations of Nano-BioInfoethics be? Some lateral thoughts. Paper presented at the the Avignon-Stanford Meeting, 17-18th December 2006, available at: http://ica.stanford.edu/france/conferences/workingpapersseries/ethics
173. Ziman JM (1994) Prometheus bound: science in a dynamic steady state. University of Chicago Press, Chicago