Bidirectional pedestrian stream model with oblique intersecting angle

Journal of Transportation Engineering

Volumn 136, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 234-242

  Wong, S C ^a   Leung, W L ^a   Chan, S H ^a   Lam, William H K ^b   Yung, Nelson H C ^a   Liu, C Y ^a   Zhang, Peng ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^c SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Experimentation; Measurement; Pedestrians; Two dimensional flow

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATED MODEL; CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; INTERSECTING ANGLE; MACROSCOPIC QUANTITIES; MODEL-BASED; PEDESTRIAN FLOW; STREAM MODELS; TRAFFIC FLOW; TWO-DIMENSIONAL FLOW;

TRAFFIC SURVEYS; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

EXPERIMENTS;

MODELING; PEDESTRIAN; TWO-DIMENSIONAL FLOW; WALKING;

EID: 77950645133     PISSN: 0733947X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000086     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Al-Masaeid HR, Al-Suleiman TI, Nelson DC. Pedestrian speed-flow relationship for central business district areas in developing countries. Transp. Res. Rec. 1993, 1396:69-74. TRREDM, 0361-1981.
2. Ando K, Ota H, Oki T. Forecasting the flow of people. Railway Research Rev. 1988, 45(8):8-14. (in Japanese).
3. Banister D. Sustainable transport: Challenges and opportunities. Transportmetrica 2007, 3(2):91-106. ZZZZZZ, 1812-8602, 10.1080/18128600708685668.
4. Cheung CY, Lam WH K. Pedestrian route choices between escalator and stairway in MTR stations. J. Transp. Eng. 1998, 124(3):277-285. JTPEDI, 0733-947X, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:3(277).
5. Christoudias C, Georgescu B, Meer P. Synergism in low-level vision. Proc., 16th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition 2002, 4:150-155. R. Kasturi, D. Laurendeau, C. Suen, eds., IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C.
6. Daamen W, Hoogendoorn SP. Experimental research of pedestrian walking behavior. Proc., Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board 2003, (CD-ROM), National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
7. Daly PN, McGrath F, Annesley TJ. Pedestrian speed/flow relationships for underground stations. Traffic Eng. Control 1991, 32(2):75-78. TENCA4, 0041-0683.
8. Drake JS, Schofer JL, May AD. A statistical analysis of speed density hypotheses. Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on Theory of Traffic Flow 1967, Elsevier, New York.
9. Harris NG. Modelling walk link congestion and the prioritisation of congestion relief. Traffic Eng. Control 1991, 32(2):78-80. TENCA4, 0041-0683.
10. He XC, Yung NH C. New method for overcoming ill-conditioning in vanishing-point-based camera calibration. Opt. Eng. 2007, 46(3):037202. OPEGAR, 0091-3286, 10.1117/1.2714991.
11. Helbing D, Buzna L, Johansson A, Werner T. Self-organized pedestrian crowd dynamics: Experiments, simulations, and design solutions. Transp. Sci. 2005, 39(1):1-24. TRSCBJ, 0041-1655, 10.1287/trsc.1040.0108.
12. Hoogendoorn SP, Daamen W. Pedestrian behavior at bottlenecks. Transp. Sci. 2005, 39(2):147-159. TRSCBJ, 0041-1655, 10.1287/trsc.1040.0102.
13. Huang L, Wong SC, Zhang M, Shu CW, Lam WH K. Revisiting Hughes' dynamic continuum model for pedestrian flow and the development of an efficient solution algorithm. Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol. 2009a, 43:127-141. TRBMDY, 0191-2615, 10.1016/j.trb.2008.06.003.
14. Huang L, Xia Y, Wong SC, Shu CW, Zhang M, Lam WH K. Dynamic continuum model for bi-directional pedestrian flows. Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers, Engineering and Computational Mechanics 2009b, 162:67-75.
15. Hughes RL. A continuum theory for the flow of pedestrians. Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol. 2002, 36(6):507-535. TRBMDY, 0191-2615, 10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00015-7.
16. Hughes RL. The flow of human crowds. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2003, 35:169-182. ARVFA3, 0066-4189, 10.1146/annurev.fluid.35.101101.161136.
17. Koushki PA, Ali SY. Pedestrian characteristics and the promotion of walking in Kuwait City center. Transp. Res. Rec. 1993, 1396:30-33. TRREDM, 0361-1981.
18. Kretz T, Grünebohm A, Kaufman M, Mazur F, Schreckenberg M. Experimental study of pedestrian counterflow in a corridor. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2006a, 2006:P10001. 10.1088/1742-5468/2006/10/P10001, 1742-5468.
19. Kretz T, Grünebohm A, Schreckenberg M. Experimental study of pedestrian flow through a bottleneck. J. Stat. Mech. 2006b, 2006:P10014. 10.1088/1742-5468/2006/10/P10014, 1742-5468.
20. Lam WH K, Cheung CY. A study of the bi-directional pedestrian flow characteristics in Hong Kong Mass Transit Railway stations. J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 1997, 2:1607-1620. 1341-8521.
21. Lam WH K, Cheung CY. Pedestrian speed/flow relationships for walking facilities in Hong Kong. J. Transp. Eng. 2000, 126(4):343-349. JTPEDI, 0733-947X, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:4(343).
22. Lam WH K, Cheung CY, Lam CF. A study of crowding effects at the Hong Kong light rail transit stations. Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract. 1999, 33(5):401-415. TRPPEC, 0965-8564, 10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00050-0.
23. Lam WH K, Lee JY S, Cheung CY. A study of the bi-directional pedestrian flow characteristics at Hong Kong signalized crosswalk facilities. Transportation 2002, 29(2):169-192. TRPOB6, 0049-4488, 10.1023/A:1014226416702.
24. Lam WH K, Lee JY S, Lee KS, Goh PK. A generalised function for modeling bi-directional flow effects on indoor walkways in Hong Kong. Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract. 2003, 37(9):789-810. TRPPEC, 0965-8564, 10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00058-2.
25. Lam WH K, Morrall JF, Ho H. Pedestrian flow characteristics in Hong Kong. Transp. Res. Rec. 1995, 1487:56-62. TRREDM, 0361-1981.
26. Lee JY S, Goh PK, Lam WH K. New level-of-service standard for signalized crosswalks with bi-directional pedestrian flows. J. Transp. Eng. 2005, 131(12):957-960. JTPEDI, 0733-947X, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:12(957).
27. Morrall JF, Ratnayake LL, Seneviratne PN. Comparison of central business district pedestrian characteristics in Canada and Sri Lanka. Transp. Res. Rec. 1991, 1294:57-61. TRREDM, 0361-1981.
28. Older SJ. Pedestrians. 1964, Rep. No.LN275/SJO, Dept. of Scientific and Industrial Research, Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, U.K.
29. Polus A, Schofer JL, Ushpiz A. Pedestrian flow and level of service. J. Transp. Eng. 1983, 109(1):46-56. JTPEDI, 0733-947X, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1983)109:1(46).
30. Rasband WS. ImageJ. 2007, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md., (Nov. 3, 2007), http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/.
31. Satoh K, Lan LW. Development and deployment of sustainable transportation. Int. J. Sustainable Transportation 2007, 1(2):69-71. 10.1080/15568310601091957.
32. Seyfried A, Steffen B, Klingsch W, Boltes M. The fundamental diagram of pedestrian movement revisited. J. Stat. Mech. 2005, 2005:P10002. 10.1088/1742-5468/2005/10/P10002, 1742-5468.
33. Smith RA. Volume flow rates of densely packed crowds. Engineering for crowd safety 1993, 313-319. R. A. Smith, J. F. Dickie, eds., Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
34. Smith RA. Density, velocity and flow relationships for closely packed crowds. Safety Sci. 1995, 18:321-327. ZZZZZZ, 0925-7535, 10.1016/0925-7535(94)00051-4.
35. Tanaboriboon Y, Guyano JA. Analysis of pedestrian movements in Bangkok. Transp. Res. Rec. 1991, 1294:52-56. TRREDM, 0361-1981.
36. Toshiyuki A. Prediction system of passenger flow. Engineering for crowd safety 1993, 249-258. R. A. Smith, J. F. Dickie, eds., Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
37. Turner FS P. Preliminary planning for a new tube railway across London. Proc., Inst. Civ. Eng. 1959, 12:19-38. 10.1680/iicep.1959.12144, 0020-3262.
38. Virkler MR, Elayadath S. Pedestrian speed-flow-density relationships. Transp. Res. Rec. 1994, 1438:51-58. TRREDM, 0361-1981.
39. Xia Y, Wong SC, Shu CW. Dynamic continuum pedestrian flow model with memory effect. Phys. Rev. E 2009, 79:066113. PLEEE8, 1063-651X, 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.066113.
40. Xia Y, Wong SC, Zhang M, Shu CW, Lam WH K. An efficient discontinuous Galerkin method on triangular meshes for a pedestrian flow model. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2008, 76:337-350. IJNMBH, 0029-5981, 10.1002/nme.2329.